SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Disconnected Wigan

15757 Views 73 Replies 28 Participants Last post by  paulw3726
Whilst reflecting on the consequences of the 32 bus no longer running (very limited level of remaining direct buses Tyldesley - Atherton - Hindley - Wigan - basically just the 132), I started to question why Wigan was included in Greater Manchester at all. Was it "added on" as an afterthought, because it didn't really belong anywhere else much? And, even as a borough, the two sides appear cobbled together like they don't maybe really belong.

Ok, so having got that rant off my chest, what do we do about it? Well, Atherton is much better connected to Bolton than to Wigan by bus, though - granted - the train service to Wigan is OK. And Tyldesley now enjoys 8 buses an hour on the Guided Busway - to Salford and Manchester, but good luck to anyone trying to get from Tyldesley to (central) Wigan.

And it's not much better in a car. Queues of traffic up the old A577, with 20mph speed limits (on an 'A' road) and not a lot of alternative ways to go. It's a LOT further on the East Lancs (A580) and overall may take just as long.

So, Wigan Council want to build a link road to Bolton in "under the radar" bits and pieces - a (very) "Poor Man's M58" but this may take years to build, if at all. Meanwhile, Athertonians are far more likely to shop in Bolton than in Wigan, and people from Tyldesley will go to Salford or Manchester (or possibly Leigh, which is "only sort of Wiganish", if at all).

Obvious answer - move Atherton under the wings of Bolton Council and move Tyldesley to - let's see - Salford, I guess.

Don't all bite at once! I did live in "parts of Wigan" (Atherton and Hindley) for nearly 3 of the last 8 years (the rest in Bolton) so I have seen these issues on the ground and have multiple pairs of worn out shoes to prove it.

Anyway, it's just a bit of a "spanner in the works" to encourage "lateral thinking" contributions regarding the solutions, if any, to Wigan's [Transport] dis-connectedness.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 20 of 74 Posts
You do seem to ignore its fairly good rail connections.
On the WCML; well connected to Liverpool and Manchester; on route of the Manchester Airport to Scotland trains.
Wigan borough has been two halves since 1974 local government saw creation of GMC.
Locally "pie eaters" and "pie haters" !

Other boroughs came together e.g. Trafford and Tameside rather than "Wigan and Leigh"
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Obvious answer - move Atherton under the wings of Bolton Council and move Tyldesley to - let's see - Salford, I guess.

.
Part of Atherton is already under Bolton Council. The Woodlands care home and the bottom of Newbrook Road almost up to the Park Gates that Peel are after redeveloping has a Manchester M46 address yet comes under Bolton council. And the bus service from Atherton to the city centre has always took less time than catching the bus from Atherton to Wigan. In fact I don't know if there is a service from Atherton - Wigan by bus now. Hasn't the 32 route from Wigan to the East Lancs park and ride been cancelled?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
You do seem to ignore its fairly good rail connections.
On the WCML; well connected to Liverpool and Manchester; on route of the Manchester Airport to Scotland trains.
Plus direct trains to Southport, Bolton, Barrow, Birmingham, Birmingham International (so that's two airports) and Blackpool ...
Whilst reflecting on the consequences of the 32 bus no longer running (very limited level of remaining direct buses Tyldesley - Atherton - Hindley - Wigan - basically just the 132), I started to question why Wigan was included in Greater Manchester at all. Was it "added on" as an afterthought, because it didn't really belong anywhere else much? And, even as a borough, the two sides appear cobbled together like they don't maybe really belong.

Ok, so having got that rant off my chest, what do we do about it? Well, Atherton is much better connected to Bolton than to Wigan by bus, though - granted - the train service to Wigan is OK. And Tyldesley now enjoys 8 buses an hour on the Guided Busway - to Salford and Manchester, but good luck to anyone trying to get from Tyldesley to (central) Wigan.

And it's not much better in a car. Queues of traffic up the old A577, with 20mph speed limits (on an 'A' road) and not a lot of alternative ways to go. It's a LOT further on the East Lancs (A580) and overall may take just as long.

So, Wigan Council want to build a link road to Bolton in "under the radar" bits and pieces - a (very) "Poor Man's M58" but this may take years to build, if at all. Meanwhile, Athertonians are far more likely to shop in Bolton than in Wigan, and people from Tyldesley will go to Salford or Manchester (or possibly Leigh, which is "only sort of Wiganish", if at all).

Obvious answer - move Atherton under the wings of Bolton Council and move Tyldesley to - let's see - Salford, I guess.

Don't all bite at once! I did live in "parts of Wigan" (Atherton and Hindley) for nearly 3 of the last 8 years (the rest in Bolton) so I have seen these issues on the ground and have multiple pairs of worn out shoes to prove it.

Anyway, it's just a bit of a "spanner in the works" to encourage "lateral thinking" contributions regarding the solutions, if any, to Wigan's [Transport] dis-connectedness.
Maybe if we had the same level of spending on transport infrastructure enjoyed by our London cousins we could afford better links, unfortunately schemes like the link from the M61 at Horwich to the M6 at Bryn are too costly so Wigan just remains clogged.
Completely fecked up country run by a shower of gobbins.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Whilst reflecting on the consequences of the 32 bus no longer running (very limited level of remaining direct buses Tyldesley - Atherton - Hindley - Wigan - basically just the 132), I started to question why Wigan was included in Greater Manchester at all. Was it "added on" as an afterthought, because it didn't really belong anywhere else much? And, even as a borough, the two sides appear cobbled together like they don't maybe really belong.

Anyway, it's just a bit of a "spanner in the works" to encourage "lateral thinking" contributions regarding the solutions, if any, to Wigan's [Transport] dis-connectedness.
My understanding is that Wigan was included in GM as an afterthought. Under the 1974 local government reorganisation GM was originally planned to include Wilmslow and Poynton but those areas did not want to be included. There was a late night debate in Parliament and Wilmslow and Poynton succeeded in persuading Ted Heath's Government to keep them in Cheshire. Wigan was then included at the last minute to make up for the loss of Wilmslow and Poynton.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I have seen maps of the proposals, dated c. 1973, in which GM not only included Wigan, but Warrington, as well (and Merseyside included both Halton and Chester).
Correction. I've done some checking and I was only partly correct. This is from Wikipedia:

"During the passage of the [Local Government 1972] bill, the towns of Whitworth, Wilmslow and Poynton successfully objected to their incorporation in the new county".

But Wigan wasn't added to GM at the last minute.
I spent three hours last Sunday with 3000 pie eaters and the words "disconnected" seems apt.

I suggest WMBC joins the highly successful Merseyside Council then.:lol:
I spent three hours last Sunday with 3000 pie eaters and the words "disconnected" seems apt.

I suggest WMBC joins the highly successful Merseyside Council then.:lol:
Ouch a fate worse than death.
Most of the egg chasers fans come from Bolton and Preston etc so I would imagine that there would only be a couple of hundred actual pie eaters present.
The original proposals for Greater Manchester included areas like Wilmslow on the logic that people living there tended to travel to Manchester to work.

However, the effect of the original proposals was to abolish Cheshire. This was (and largely is) a big Tory area and the Heath Government decided that Cheshire must be saved. Which is why, rather irrationally, Warrington and Halton were added to it. The leafy areas like Wilmslow and Poynton were similarly "saved" from any prospect of being ruled by the Bolshevik hordes of Manchester Town Hall.

It is an odd fact that, even today, people in the outlying areas of GM often have this ancestral horror of being "ruled" by "evil" Manchester, when quite clearly the numbers mean that the influence of Manchester is far out-weighed by the votes of the other boroughs. But I suppose it is an emotional rather than a logical response, and may perhaps be seen as a small version of the UK/EU debate.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Wasn't so much about the politicking but about the finance. Rural areas require more spending to achieve the same level of service as they are spread out. Bin lorrys have to travel further, offices more spread out, more roads to maintain etc... while at the same time they generate less tax revenue as fewer people live and work there. So it was recognised every county council needed at least one mid sized town to provide the tax base to make them a viable entity. So for example Warrington was added to Cheshire, Skelmersdale (originally would have been part of the Lancashire district of Southport before Southport town got added to Merseyside) added to West Lancashire so as to balance the books.
Just read the Redcliffe Maud proposals kids. If you erm want to?
I've never understood why Wallgate and North Western have never been integrated.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
If you ignore some rather unpleasant grade and curve issues, then you have the problem that all Southport and Kirkby trains would have to cross the west coast main line on the flat which would cause more issues than combining the stations would solve especially given the distance between them is less than that between platform 1 and 14 at Piccadilly.

To be honest I got the impression the OP was more concerned with the poor connections between Wigan and the rest of the borough rather than Wigan and everywhere else.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I've never understood why Wallgate and North Western have never been integrated.
Been three proposals for it over the last decade and a half from Virgin Rail, and the Council and doesn't require at grade crossings simply moving platforms. Money is the main obstacle Halcrow in 2011 estimated it would cost £30.36m and have a BCR of between 1.7 and 3.4. Its next on TfGMs list after Bolton Interchange as large station project to do when you have a wad of cash to spend.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
There may also be a need to spend money on the bridge under (the road) Wallgate, either repairs because it's cracking up. or alterations for electrification headroom at some future date, or both.
There may also be a need to spend money on the bridge under (the road) Wallgate, either repairs because it's cracking up. or alterations for electrification headroom at some future date, or both.




Would any honourable member care to suggest a viable civil/mechanical engineering solution to this problem? Are we talking about the demolition of some or all of the building above the tracks? Does the covered way roof need raising or the ground level lowering - if the latter what would be the implications of the climb out of Wallgate be? Would some kind of relining/re-profiling of the tunnel - something similar to Holme Tunnel suffice? Would some kind of rigid overhead conductor rail system - such as that produced by Furrer+Frey for the GWR line through the Severn Tunnel - be possible. Is a neutral section coupled with on train super capacitors feasible?
See less See more
3
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It is indeed a major issue, the props were only supposed to be temporary.

One way of doing it may be to take the floor up, put in some new supports below, pour a reinforced concrete slab then remove the old supports though you would lose some headroom inside. The row of shops you could probably demolish and rebuild but the Wallgate building is listed
1 - 20 of 74 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top