SkyscraperCity banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,024 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Very long article .... Amazing, Asthonishing, Interesting ....
As Indonesian ..... just envy how they successfully did this .....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7693580/site/newsweek/page/4/

Does the Future Belong to China?
< Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next >

Business center: Shanghai's financial center is eight times larger than London's Canary Wharf
Ilkka Uimonen / Magnum for Newsweek
Business center: Shanghai's financial center is eight times larger than London's Canary Wharf

A New Kind Of Challenge

For the first decade of its development (the 1980s), China did not have a foreign policy. Or rather, its grand strategy was a growth strategy. China quietly supported (or did not oppose) U.S. policies, largely because it saw good relations with America as the cornerstone of its development push. And this nonconfrontational approach—"to hide its brightness"—still lingers. With the exception of anything related to Taiwan, even now its major foreign-policy moves are largely outgrowths of economic imperatives. These days that means a ceaseless search for continued supplies of oil and other commodities.

advertisement
But things are changing. In a paper titled "The Beijing Consensus," drawing heavily on interviews with leading Chinese officials and academics, Joshua Cooper Ramo provides a fascinating picture of China's new foreign policy. "Rather than building a US-style power, bristling with arms and intolerant of others' world views," he writes, "China's emerging power is based on the example of their own model, the strength of their economic system, and their rigid defense of ... national sovereignty" (http://fpc.org. uk/publications/123).

China has followed a very different development strategy than Japan. Rather than focusing only on export-led growth to a few markets and keeping its internal market closed, China opened itself to foreign investment and trade. The result is that much of the world now relies on the China market. From the United States to Germany to Japan, exports to China are among the crucial factors propelling growth. For developing markets, China is the indispensable trading partner.

In November 2004, President George W. Bush and China's President Hu Jintao traveled through Asia. I was in the region a few weeks afterward and was struck by how almost everyone I spoke with rated Hu's visits as far more successful than Bush's. Karim Raslan, a Malaysian writer, explained: "Bush talked obsessively about terror. He sees all of us through that one prism. Yes, we worry about terror, but frankly that's not the sum of our lives. We have many other problems. We're retooling our economies, we're wondering how to deal with the rise of China, we're trying to address health, social and environmental problems. Hu talked about all this; he talked about our agenda, not just his agenda." From Indonesia to Brazil, China is winning new friends.

There are a group of Americans—chiefly neoconservatives and Pentagon officials—who have been sounding the alarms about the Chinese threat. And they speak of it largely in military terms, usually wildly exaggerating China's capabilities. But the facts simply do not support their case. China is certainly expanding its military, with a budget that rises 10 percent or more a year. But it is still spending a fraction of what America does, at most 10 percent of the Pentagon's annual bill.

The Chinese threat or challenge will not present itself in the familiar guise of another Soviet Union, straining to keep pace with America in military terms. It is more likely to be what Ramo describes as an "asymmetrical superpower." It will use its economic dominance and its political skills to achieve its objectives. China does not want to invade and occupy Taiwan; it is more likely to keep undermining the Taiwan independence movement, so that Beijing slowly accumulates advantage and wears out the opponent. "The goal for China is not conflict but the avoidance of conflict," Ramo writes. "True success in strategic issues involves manipulating a situation so effectively that the outcome is inevitably in favor of Chinese interests. This emerges from the oldest Chinese strategic thinker, Sun Zi, who argued that 'every battle is won or lost before it is ever fought'."

At least that's the plan. The trouble is that while maintaining this long-term strategy, China often lapses into short-term behavior that seems aggressive and hostile. Perhaps this is because the rational decision-making that guides its economic policy is not so easily applied in the realm of politics, where honor, history, pride and anger all play a large role. So with Taiwan, last week Beijing was playing out its long-term plan, "normalizing" relations with the island's main opposition party, and smothering it with conciliation. But last month it passed the anti-secession law, which angered most Taiwanese and alarmed Americans and Europeans.
 

·
Dangerous User
Joined
·
9,789 Posts
for me i don't know but i know that in a few years time china will be one of the most respectful and important country in the world!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,024 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
encon said:
for me i don't know but i know that in a few years time china will be one of the most respectful and important country in the world!
Yeach ...
Hope India #2 and Indonesia #3 ...cheers .... :cheers: :cheers: :cheers:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
259 Posts
i tried reading that article, but never finished it, too long. so i listened to the audio program instead. china will definitely play a major role in the future (it already does now) but who knows what the future holds for us. but here's the thing: even if its gdp takes over the US/EU, its gdp per capita will remain low. china's growing fast yes, but on whose money? the investors are from japan, europe, and US, right? when it becomes the world's largest economy and single market (we know it's when not if), will it be able to take over the cultural domination of the west? meaning: will people switch from english as a second language to chinese, watch chinese movies not hollywood, and go to chinese universities as opposed to european or US? will it be the outsourcer and instead of the outsourcee? will it be the one probing mars and jupiter, inventing new medicines, perfecting green technology? and more importantly, will it be the one setting the course for world peace, growth, stability, and democracy?

these questions remain to be answered.

in the mean time, i am hoping that china's rise will continue to be a peaceful one (well relatively peaceful, they did have tiananmen) and bring along with it countries that surround it, especially Indonesia. in that case, indonesia must prepare itself and do its part. start by eradicating corruption and stemming anti-chinese sentiment legacy of the new order regime.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,639 Posts
well the good thing is The US won't really be Arogant anymore.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,024 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Gile .. siapa yang naikin thread ini nich ? :)
thread jaman zeboot ....

Indonesia kebanyakan ngomong orang nya :)
kerja nya dikit.
dan mental nya tertanam mental materi.

Jadi kalo kita liat seorang dokter di Indonesia
dokter itu dibilang sukses kalo :
1. punya rumah besar
2. punya mobil mewah
3. punya villa
[ see arah nya ke materi semua ]
harusnya seorang dokter dibilang sukses itu kalo :
1. berhasil menyembuhkan banyak pasien
2. berhasil menemukan sesuatu yg berguna bagi ilmu kedokteran
3. dedikasi seorang dokter terhadap profesinya.

Misal lagi ... seorang dosen, seorang teknokrat, seorang birokrat ...
mereka2 dibilang sukses .... pasti kalo faktor2 materi itu di atas terpenuhi.

Nah ... karena orang kita melihat orang lain itu melalui "kaca mata" materi.
maka kita terbius bahwa pencapaian ( acknowlegment ) yg paling utama itu adalah materi.

bukan pencapaian dalam bidang prestasi
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top