SkyscraperCity Forum banner

DOWNTOWN LA | Lifan Tower | 107m | 350ft | 29 fl | Pro

3294 Views 9 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  croyboy
New Look for City West's Lifan Tower





A new design has emerged for American Lifan's proposal to construct a mixed-use high-rise development at 1247 W. 7th Street in City West, thanks to a presentation to the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council's Planning and Land Use Committee.
The project, which would rise from a now-vacant one-acre lot at 7th and Witmer Streets, calls for the construction of a 29-story tower featuring 306 studio, one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments - including 34 units of very low-income housing - above 5,700 square feet of ground-floor retail space and parking for 379 vehicles.
Architecture firm MVE + Partners has redesigned the proposed development, taking over from earlier work by Pasadena-based American General Design. It is now portrayed as a contemporary 350-foot-tall building, featuring amenity decks at the roof levels and above a rear parking garage.
The design includes vertical fins, intended to articulate the tower's glass exterior, with large balconies at the corners. Residential units line floors three through five along 7th and Witmer Streets, masking above-grade parking levels from view.
Construction of the Lifan Tower is contingent on the approval of several density bonus incentives by the City of Los Angeles.
See less See more
2
  • Like
Reactions: 4
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
I would go even further: it should be more tallest.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I think the height is perfect for Westlake. That area, like Echo Park, will change soon.


Moving off subject. I wonder if those rather drab and dingy beaux arts buildings like this one next to Lifan can be made a bit more vibrant looking? They are clearly worth saving but could use a touch-up or two.
See less See more
Best that can be done with those structures is a paint job if the owner wants to keep the same architecture. Recladding projects like that in LA have proven to take longer than building newer structures from the ground up. There's kind of a bias in the rendering tho, since the proposed project is clearly highlighted. That structure up close is quite nice. Would be great to see more developers move away from the modern glass/thin framed structures toward more of the vast variety of other architectural types out there.
See less See more
Best that can be done with those structures is a paint job if the owner wants to keep the same architecture. Recladding projects like that in LA have proven to take longer than building newer structures from the ground up. There's kind of a bias in the rendering tho, since the proposed project is clearly highlighted. That structure up close is quite nice. Would be great to see more developers move away from the modern glass/thin framed structures toward more of the vast variety of other architectural types out there.
Totally agree. Glass is clean and bright but also cold and distant. Good to mix it up wit metals, stone, etc.

Also agree that the old beaux arts mid-rises are hard to jazz up. But maybe some work on the first level or two can make a difference at street level.
See less See more
Sadly, structures like these might have to go eventually. Wouldn't be surprised if some of these buildings were constructed with plenty of sidewalk space, but now many streets have been widened to 3 or more lanes with the sidewalks shrunk to low capacity foot traffic that runs right by the lobby doors. A hurried opening can knock someone right into the street. Wilshire Royale and Bryson Apartments on Wilshire/Rampart force Rampart from a 5 lane boulevard to a 2 lane street in just one intersection before having to connect with our busiest traffic artery, Wilshire Blvd..

That Beaux Arts building in the rendering for the proposed Lifan Tower is the Mayfair Hotel. It has an okay amount of sidewalk space up to Wilshire and has an obvious foyer entrance, but is definitely in need of a touchup on the walls facing the same direction. No storefronts, covered windows, and just a blank beige leave much to be desired here. The surrounding streets are much worse. The structure's west face (besides being very blank) is right up to the sidewalk, which is only wide enough for one person. There's no passing without someone having to jump the curb into the street, which is barely two lanes and with no room for street parking and is only marked closeby the intersection. The east face of the building isn't much better. There is street parking (tho the entire street is unmarked for parking or for a center dividing line) and the sidewalk is slightly wider, but it faces the familiar problems we have on many of our streets like large old tree roots popping out of the cement tiles.
See less See more
Of course, it can't all last forever. But when it's time for these buildings to go, it wouldn't hurt for some street realignments before putting up some major developments expected to last the next several decades. Kinda sucks when a project like Lifan Tower goes up, it has to take up a T-intersection where one street dead-ends right into a 'right turn only' option without a crosswalk for pedestrians.
See less See more
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top