To me, it is not bad at all, but not as good as the original.
Oh... I see. One has to look several times to notice, that the basic design of both renders is more or less the same, only with reductions to the top. It's an optical illusion: on the old render it looks as if the fins would overhang towards the viewer, and on the new one you can easily presume that the tallest slab would be vertical when seen from the right side. In fact the top bends sidewards (resp. backwards) on both renders!You have right. It is just another angle.
It is a shorter version, but design is the same (IMO), just another angle.Oh... I see. One has to look several times to notice, that the basic design of both renders is more or less the same, only with reductions to the top. It's an optical illusion: on the old render it looks as if the fins would overhang towards the viewer, and on the new one you can easily presume that the tallest slab would be vertical when seen from the right side. In fact the top bends sidewards (resp. backwards) on both renders!
Btw. the design of the lower and middle floors is more differentiated now, especially with that bulge around lv 14.
Hell, I'd have a huge wild party if a skyscraper like that came to Baltimore. As it is, our next tallest building project is on hold, much like everything else on this side of the sea.To me, it is not bad at all, but not as good as the original.
To me its like 350 or 375 meters in the last version.It is a shorter version, but design is the same (IMO), just another angle.
![]()
:lol:if its still 400+ meter, then life is good
Agreed. Shorter or not, it's still better than having nothing at all on that plot!Still a great skyscraper design with nice height !
The CTBUH page for DAMAC Heights has been updated to reflect the latest figures from Aedas. Sorry for the delay. We will try to get more information on the project in the near future.maybe CTBUH...?
height: 426.08 meter / 1397.90 feet
floors: 100
http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/index.php?do=building&building_id=185