I'm more used to the "with"
Empire State Building - With or Without ????
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
It doesn't look too bad either way. It could get away with both, but I think I like the second version slightly more.
With it just looks incomplete without.
WITH. Proportionally it is the natural conclusion of the spire.
Ditto.mankawabi said:Definitely WITH
It looks like an enormous canon without the spire!
I say with but it's sexy as hell both ways.
with. it's like, "let's go higher, sexier!!!"
-
-
With....
It doesn't look completed without
It doesn't look completed without
I can't imaging how Empire State Building would look without!
With - It looks very blunt and awkward without.
Oh dear... this is not Michael Jackson's nose we are talking about. It cannot
be bobbed every now and then for fashion's sake. That would not do... it must
be left the way it was intended.................
be bobbed every now and then for fashion's sake. That would not do... it must
be left the way it was intended.................
With...and that billboard scars the hell outa me.
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
SkyscraperCity Forum
A forum community dedicated to skyscrapers, towers, highrises, construction, and city planning enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about structures, styles, reviews, scale, transportation, skylines, architecture, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Top Contributors this Month
View All
Katarzyna DJ
6800 Replies
calatravavx
2781 Replies
kunming tiger
1373 Replies
Recommended Communities
