^^ ከግራኝ ዘመን በፊት በጣም የዳበረ የ መማርና የመመራመር ፍላጎት ያለው ህብረተሰብ ነበርን፣ ምናልባት ለብዙ ትውልዶች የተላለፈው ሰልምና እርጋታ ውጤት ይሆናል፣ ከግራኝ ዘመን በሗላ ግን፣ ጠጅና አረቄ ከመጠጣትና ጥሬ ስጋ ከመብላት ውጪ ምንም አማያጓጓው ህብረተሰብ የሆንን ይመስለኛል።
Where do I come from? Had I lived before the creator of the world, I would have known the beginning of my life and of the consciousness [of myself] that created me? Was I created by my own hands? But I didn’t exist before I was created. If I say that my father and my mother created me, then I must search for the creator of my parents and of the parents of my parents until they arrive at the first who were not created as we [are] but who came into this world in some other way without being generated. For if they themselves have been created, I know nothing of their origin unless I say, ‘he who created them from nothing must be an uncreated essence who is and will be for all centuries [to come] the lord and master of all things, without beginning or end, immutable, whose years cannot be numbered.’ And I said: ‘Therefore, there is a creator; else there would have been no creation. This creator who endowed us with the gifts of intelligence and reason, cannot he himself be without them? For he created us as intelligent beings from the abundance of this intelligence and the same one being
comprehends all, creates all, is almighty.’ And I used to say: ‘my creator will hear me if I pray to him,’ and because of this thought I felt very happy.” (Sumner, 1985, P.233).
Reading a book by Dawit worku Kidane. title the ethics of Zere Yaeqob.
Just wow. I have heard about Zere yaqob the philosopher but i though he was one of thous religious fanatics just like thous various ABBAs and such who lived in medieval ethiopia , , but Man I was wrong , Who knew we Ethiopians had our own Rene Descartes. His philopshy is just mind blowing especially when you look at his way of reasoning and the question he dared to ask in thous time and age. imagine he and his student wrote the book "Hatata" in 16century and he was already asking the authenticity of organized religion. the women role in the society , sexuality and attacking various belief systems.
Look at the way he tries to prove the existence of god. He does not site the scripture or any other teachings , Pure independent thought and methodological Rationalist.
Ironically Zare Yoqob was born in the beginning of Gonder dynasty after the gragen muhamed. in the brief reign of king yacob but lived through king Susenyos I and fassiledes of Gonder. perhaps the last golden ages of Ethiopia. He was not a king , Zere Yocob was a son of farmer born in axum who become religious teacher later in his years. he was probably involved in fierce debates between the catholics and the Orthodox teachings in the church, later on his refusal to convert into catholicism in reign of king Susenyos made him flee axum to a smaller villige in gonder enfranz.^^ ከግራኝ ዘመን በፊት በጣም የዳበረ የ መማርና የመመራመር ፍላጎት ያለው ህብረተሰብ ነበርን፣ ምናልባት ለብዙ ትውልዶች የተላለፈው ሰልምና እርጋታ ውጤት ይሆናል፣ ከግራኝ ዘመን በሗላ ግን፣ ጠጅና አረቄ ከመጠጣትና ጥሬ ስጋ ከመብላት ውጪ ምንም አማያጓጓው ህብረተሰብ የሆንን ይመስለኛል።
is there a description of how he looked like ?
interesting: Zere Yaeqob built his capital Debre Birhan (Mountain of light) after he witnessed halley's comet shoting across the sky while he was camping around the area. Hence its named Debre Birhan.
THe most famous of Ethiopian Philosophers in the recent past are Zere Yakob and Walda Heewo (17th c)t. In history, the Ethiopian monasteries were endowed with Gult lands (benefit right to taxation) by kings. Monasteries were the only educational centers until modern time, and they financed scholars who could instruct courses on reading, writing, sacred music of the church, poetry, grammar, Qene, history and religious paintings. The Ethiopian monasteries vied among themselves to attract the best specialist in each of the fields mentioned. The educational program was very rigorous taking from four to seven years. Graduate of these schools could often start their own community, and some even ended up as philosophers. One of the philosopher was known by the name Zera Yaqob. Zera Yaqob, the philosopher, wrote a philosophical work in 1667 titled in Geez as Hatata, which meant "to question bit by bit, piece-meal; to search into or through, to investigate accurately". Professor Sumner, commented that "it is an absolutely original work, the fruit of his own personal reflection". Sumner compares Zere Yaqob, with his contemporary western philosopher, Rene Descartes, author of Discourse on Method (1637). "In both philosophers one finds a method,the occasion for a critical inquiry, the necessity for such an inquiry, a criterion which leads to the establishment of a basic principle that is applied in both authors theodicy, ethics and psychology (and in Descartes to cosmology). In both also the method of inquiry is revolutionary, although its roots are deeply theological..."
The Contribution of Native Ethiopian Philosophers, Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot, to Ethiopian Philosophy
By: Tassew Asfaw Department of Philosophy May, 2004
The Contribution of Native Ethiopian Philosophers,
Zara Yacob and Wold Hiwot, (16- 17th c) to Ethiopian Philosophy
Zara Yacob was born from poor farmers in Aksum. He studied the
books of the psalms of David and the interpretation of the Holy Scriptures.
This experience helped him to begin his philosophy during his two years
time in the cave near the Tekeze River to escape from the accusation of king
Susenyos for his position of being the enemy of Catholic faith. Wolde Hiwot
was tutored by Zara Yacob in grammar, quine, and interpretation of the Holy Scriptures, and he also became Zara Yacob’s confidant. This helped him to write his philosophy following the philosophical system of his teacher. The original works of these two Ethiopian philosophers was translated and introduced to the philosophical world by Claude Sumner, an Indian professor who was teaching at Addis Ababa University.
Here, I would like to introduce the contribution of these native
Ethiopian philosophers, Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot, through referring to
different branches of philosophy. Thus, I will explain the contribution of
these philosophers to metaphysics, epistemology, Ethics, Aesthetics, and
logic. In addition to this, their contribution to gender issues will also be
1. The Contribution of Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot to Metaphysics
Metaphysics can be defined as the study of reality in broad sense. It
can be also defined as the study of transcendental reality, which lies beyond
the physical world and cannot be grasped by means of empirical
observations. Super naturalists understand Meta physics in its broader sense
because they raise questions of reality like ‘what is reality?’ What is real/, is it one or many? And so on. They also understand metaphysics in its
narrower sense because they believe in supernatural or transcendent reality,
say God. Zora Yacob and Wolde Hiwot raised those and similar questions
because of this they can be categorized as super naturalist philosophers. Let
us first look at the method of Zara Yacob, which was used to prove the
existence of God. He raised metaphysical questions like, “How does God
know; or is there any one in heaven who knows? Or if there is one who
knows, why does He remain silent on men’s depravity while they corrupt
His name act with iniquity in His holy name?” (Sumner, 1985, P.232). Zera
Yacob raised these questions because he observed that the followers of everyreligion argued as if their faith was true and the other’s faith was false. They were defending their own faith while rejecting other faiths. Moreover, he was praying that his God would make him intelligent and reasonable in order to be able to know the hidden wisdom of God. He tried to prove whether there is God or not using his own metaphysical theory as follows: One day I said to my self in my own thought ‘whom am I praying to or is there a God who listens to me?’ At this thought I was invaded by
dead full sadness and I said: ‘In vain have I kept my own heart pure
(as David says). Later on I thought of the words of the same David, ‘Is
the inventor of the ear unable to hear?’ and I said: ‘who is it that
provided me with an ear to hear, who created me as a rational [being] and how have I come into this world? Where do I come from? Had I lived before the creator of the world, I would have known the beginning of my life and of the consciousness [of myself] that created me? Was I created by my own hands? But I didn’t exist before I was created. If I say that my father and my mother created me, then I must search for the creator of my parents and of the parents of my parents until they arrive at the first who were not created as we [are] but who came into this world in some other way without being generated. For if they themselves have been created, I know nothing of their origin unless I say, ‘he who created them from nothing most be an uncreated
essence who is and will be for all centuries [to come] the lord and
master of all things, without beginning or end, immutable, whose
years cannot be numbered.’ And I said: ‘Therefore, there is a creator;
else there would have been no creation. This creator who endowed us
with the gifts of intelligence and reason, cannot he himself be without
them? For he created us as intelligent beings from the abundance of
this intelligence and the same one being comprehends all, creates all,
is almighty.’ And I used to say: ‘my creator will hear me if I pray to
him,’ and because of this thought I felt very happy. (Sumner, 1985,
P.233). The long paragraph above shows the method of doubting used by Zara Yacob to prove the existence of God. And it also shows that Zara Yacob didn’t accept God as unquestionable entity because of this it may be possible
to say that Zara Yacob’s God wasn’t the same as that of the Christian’s God, which is unquestionable and blindly accepted through faith.
After proving the existence of God, Zara Yacob questioned whether
every thing that is written in the Holy Scripture is true or not. He wanted to
consult scholars and thinkers but he realized that these individuals would tell him only what they were supposing as true or they would tell him only the rightness of their own faith. Because of this they can’t be taken as neutral judges. He also examined the written documents of other religion and concluded that, there are true as well as false concepts so that we have to distinguish falsity from truth through rationalization of these concepts. This shows that Zara Yacob didn’t accept the Christianity and the Holy scripture as they are. He rejected some of the points, which don’t have any
rational basis. Because of this, Zara Yacob’s religious ideology as well as his God was to some extent different from Christians, and other religious ideologies.Therefore, he has his own Meta physical foundation for the existence of God.
Wholde Hiwot also raised Metaphysical questions on the existence of
God. He used empirical method to prove the existence of God. According to
him, all things we see in this world, including ourselves, are transitory and
created. But how can they be created without a creator? Because each
creature is finite and weak; it has no power to be created from nothing.
Therefore, there needs be one essence, that existed before all creatures,
without beginning or end, that created from nothing all that is dense and
thin, visible and invisible- i.e. God. For him the perfection of God can also
be understood from his creatures. All that has created is very good in the
way He created it. Some people may classify things as useful and useless
because they are unable to understand in the way God created them. Hence,some things, which were considered as useless in the past, become useful in the present. This shows that human mind is less perfect than God. Because
of this, people can’t understand every thing in the way they are created.
Therefore, for Wolde Hiwot, God is created out of nothing and every
creature of his has purposes. But since human mind unable to understand the whole works of God, people may consider some of the creatures as useless. Descartes also used this method of proving the existence of God by
negating the finite. According to Descartes, more reality is found in the
infinite substance than in the finite. Moreover, the idea of God existed
before the idea of human being. Doubting and desires in human being
implies lack of something. This recognition of detects for man himself
resulted from some idea of a more perfect being. (Maynard, 1952, P.86).
2. The Contribution of Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot to Epistemology
Epistemology can be defined as the theory of knowledge. It attempts
to answer questions like where does knowledge come from? What is the
basis of knowledge? And so on. For rationalist philosophers the source of
knowledge is reason while for empiricist philosophers the source of
knowledge is experience. Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot can be considered
as rationalist philosophers in loosen sense because rationalism, in the loosen sense, is the belief that at least some knowledge about reality can
be acquired through reason independent of sense experience. And Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot believed God as the source of knowledge and this
knowledge, to some extent, is found through reasoning.
For Zara Yacob, reason and faith are inseparable because God is
embodied in absolute reasonableness and the only everlasting thing in this
world is the knowledge of God. Like Descartes, for Zara Yacob, faith could
be superior to reason if it is first examined and pass through reasoning other wise it is inferior to reason. According to him, it is possible to arrive at truth through critical inquiry. He said, “To the person who seeks it, truth is immediately revealed. Indeed he who investigates with the pure intelligence set by the creator in the heart of each man and scrutinizes the order and laws of creation will discover the truth”. (Sumner, 1985, P.236). Even though human being are created with less perfection than God, they have the capacity to strive perfection. Therefore, they can practice their own
investigation using their intellect for reasoning.
Like his master, Wolde Hiwot also gave priority for reasoning than
faith. Faith must be based on a rational and critical analysis. According to
him, faith without inquiry is not demanded by God and doesn’t be fit the
nature of a rational creature. Hence, it is not fitting that we believe in the
faith of our fathers before we enquire and come to know that their faith is
true (Sumner, 1985 P.259). For him, knowledge is an endless phenomenon,
one wouldn’t be exhausted in having the knowledge of every fields of study.
He said, “don’t become disheartened with having to go on learning and don’t
give it up during all your life. Even if you learn the teachings of all men,
there are many things you don’t know. (Sumner, 1985, P.261). He took the
analogy of the bee to explain the need of hard working to human being in
order to have knowledge of every sorts of thinking. The bee collects the raw
materials from all flowers and from different fields to produce honey and
wax. The honey used for food while the wax used for light. Likewise human
beings have to learn different kinds of knowledge from different fields of
study in order to be intellectual for them or to get mental satisfaction, and to
serve as light for illiterates. They have responsibilities to educate the
illiterates and to avoid ignorance through having knowledge of different
fields of study.
He also argued the advantages of reason over emotion. Many scholars
from the west argued that African preferred emotion to reason. But Wolde
Hiwot’s work can be taken as evidence to say that African preferred reason
to emotion. Wolde Hiwot said, “one who is patient has more value than one
who is powerful and a Wiseman is preferable to an angry man. In all
difficulties make use of patience, because although patience is bitter when it is exercised, it turns out later to be more pleasant than honey and sugar.”
(Sumner, 1985, P. 283.)
Therefore, he gave priority for reason than faith and emotion. Form
this, one can say hat Ethiopian philosophers were rationalist thinkers and
they contribute critical analysis and the method of inquiry to the
philosophical world. They contributed this without influenced by the view of
the traditional society. They also weren’t influenced by any foreign
philosophical concepts rather they provided their own original philosophical
speculation. In line with this, Workineh Kelbessa, an Ethiopian philosopher,
also stated as follows:
The 17th century Ethiopian thinkers Zara Yacob and Wolde
Hiwot however, were not influenced by foreign culture. As we
have stated earlier Zara Yacob reveals his ability and
inclination to apply his own independent critical objection to
the beliefs of his people. He was a critical independent thinker
who guided his thoughts and judgments by the power of reason.
The implication is that Ethiopians without foreign influence are
not innocent of logical and critical inquiry. Of course; religious
outlook exercised a profound influence on Zara Yacob’s
thought. That is why we label him as a rationalist philosopher
in the religious Sense (1994, P. 449).
This is also true for Wolde Hiwot because he applied his own
independent critical objection to the beliefs of the society and he also wasn’t
‘influenced by any foreign culture.
3. The Contribution of Zara Yacob and Wold Hiwot to Value Theory
Value theory includes the theory of ethics, which studies moral
values, and Aesthetics, which studies aesthetical values. Zara Yacob and
Wolde Hiwot contributed a lot to these value theories.
A. The Contribution of Zarayacob and Wolde Hiwot to Ethical Values
Like Kant, Zara Yacob considered God as a moral lawgiver. For Zara
Yacob, human beings have the free will to do right or wrong. Of course,
God can guide us in the way He likes but he doesn’t want to deprive our
freedom of using our mind. Thus, individuals interpret the laws of Christians
and Muslims and the laws of God corrupted by these individuals. They use
their intellect and free will to decide what is true and what is false. But the
followers of these individuals are unable to use such opportunities rather
they accept what their religious readers told to them. He said, “God indeed
has illuminated the heart of man with understanding by which he can see the
good and evil, recognize the licit and illicit, distinguish truth from error, and
by your light we see the light, oh Lord! If we use this light of our heart
properly, it cannot deceive us, the purpose of this light, which our creator
gave us, is to be saved by it, and not to be ruined [by it]. Every thing that the
light of our intelligence shows us comes from the sources truth”. (Sumner,
1985, P.237). This shows that we have the right to choose between good and
bad even though the criterion to be right or wrong is set by supernatural
power (God). And we choose the right or wrong action by calculating the
consequence of our action. According to him, people hastily accept what
they have heard from their fathers with out any critical examination. But
God created man to be the master of his own actions; so that he will be what
he wills to be, good or bad, if he chooses to be wicked he can continue for
his wickedness (Sumner, 1985, P. 235). This is related to modern
teleological theory of morality, which stresses on the consequences of
actions, and even makes the consequences of actions the criterion, or test of
In line with this, Wolde Hiwot argued that since God is a perfect
essence, He doesn’t punish us on account of his becoming angry but it is we
who bring punishment upon ourselves when we violate the laws that the
Creator set up for all his creation (summer, 1985, 262). Thus, God doesn’t
enforce us to do well and not to do badly. We can practice evil actions if we
want but such actions will have punishment as its consequences. Or God
doesn’t oblige us to accept his orders or laws, we have free will not to accept
it if we have reason that those laws written in books are not given from God.
And even if we accept these laws and if we don’t want to practice them, God
doesn’t feel angry but we may not get the rewards from Him.
Wold Hiwot also attempted to give ethical advice for the people to
avoid weakness and to work hard. If there are individuals who are poor due
to other factors rather than their laziness, it is advisable to help them. He
said, “don’t be harsh towards your fellow man; if your possessions are
greater give out much; if you have only a little, share it with those who are
needy and who are poorer than you, and God’s blessing will dwell upon you:
he has created together the rich and poor, strong and weak, so that we may
help one another and strengthen ourselves with mutual charity” (Sumner,
1985, P.274.). He distinguished to whom help is needed. Helping those lazy
individuals, who are able to work, is meaning less according to him.
He also explained the method of bringing up children. According to
him, parents have moral as well as religious obligation to bring up their
children in such a way that they will become knowledgeable, responsible
and good citizen. To do this, ethical and religious education is the most
important and when parents teach their children, they have to be taking care
of giving good examples. If children listen bad examples from their parents
or from their teachers, they will be initiated in doing evil so that the kind of
examples, which are proposed by parents or teachers, have impacts on the
future character of children since they are premature to critical examination
of a given example.
The Contribution of Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot to Aesthetics.
It is the value involved in art and our experience of beauty. According
to Zara Yacob, all things in the universe are great and admirable. They are
created with great wisdom; they needed especial artist to be made orderly
and beautifully. He said, “with these words was I praying day and night: I
was admiring the beauty of God creatures according to their orders, the
[domestic] animals and the wild beasts. They are drawn by the nature of
their creation towards the preservation of their life and propagation of their
species” (Summer, 1985 P. 246). Like any artist Zara Yacob admired the
beauty of nature, or the beauty of power of the sumperem artist i.e..God.
Every thing in the universe is put purposely and orderly. The living things as
well as the non-living things are respecting their order and this makes them
attractive to human being. Wolde Hiwot also attempted to correct the
misconception of art in Ethiopia. In the history of Ethiopia, there was a
tradition, which discouraged the handicraft or arts. The people of Ethiopia
were considering the potters and the black smiths as the evil eyes or as
individual who affects others by staring at them. This tradition is still existed
in some parts of Ethiopia. But the works of potters and blacksmiths are
necessary for traditional society of Ethiopia. Because of this, Wolde Hiwot
tried to appreciate handicrafts in his philosophy. He said, “love to work with
your hands as much as your life allows, and be expert in this work that you
may gain a profit from it; don’t be ashamed to work with your hands,
because it is God’s precept; without working of their hands all human
creatures perish and their whole life is destroyed”. And he added, “ He who
lives on the works of anther man while he has himself the capacity to work
is a thief and a plundered” (Sumner, 1985, P.271.). This shows that Wolde
Hiwot argued on the advantages of the handicraft, which are designed by
good Artist. It is an art, which is used to gain profit and to make life possible
for peasants because local artists produce most of the tools of peasants.
Another contribution of Wolde Hiwot to aesthetics is his view of love.
According to him love is the basis of every beautiful things because of this it
makes all things beautiful. In line with this Plato also explained the
relationship between love and beauty. According him, one can ascend from
these earthy things under the influence of true love. And begins to perceive
that beauty which is ever lasting. For Wolde Hiwot, love is more valuable
than great riches and all the honors of this world. It is perfect and real and
perfect love is not restricted to words and lips. It must be practicable
(Sumner, 1985, P.268).
But unlike Plato, for Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot it is not necessary
to go beyond this world to find beauty because they were admiring God’s
creatures in the universe. More over, love is not ideal for them rather it is
some thing practicable.
4. The Contribution of Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot to Gender Issue
In Ethiopia until recent time, monastic life was preferred to marriage
for religious values. The justification for this may be the beliefs of the
society women as impure. And if a man who is considered as pure
concluded marriage with woman, who is considered as impure, he would
lose his purity and become impure. Because of this most Christians preferred
monastic life to marriage. But on the contrary to this, Wolde Hiwot and Zara
Yacab raised an important gender issue. Zara Yacob believed in the equality
of men and women. According to him the teachings of Christians
appreciated mastic life and indicated the impurity of marriage wrongly. He
said, “the law of Christians which propounds the superiority of monastic life
over marriage is false and can’t come from God.” (Sumner, 1985 P. 236). He
criticized monastic life and advocated the equality of husband and wife at
marriage. When Zara Yacob asked, his master, Habtu, for his willingness of
Hirut for marriage, Habtu replied, “Here after she is not my maid servant,
but yours.” But Zara Yacob didn’t agree on the idea of the relationship of
husband and wife as master-servant relationship because of this he replied to
Habtu, “I don’t wish her to be my maid servant, but my wife, husband and
wife are equal in marriage; we shouldn’t call them master and maidservant;
for they are one flesh and one life” (Sumner, 1985, P.248). This shows that
Zara Yacob was released from his hermeneutic background, the beliefs
before cross examination, and became sensitive to gender issue.
According to Belai Giday, an Ethiopian historian, Zara Yacob was
struggling for the rights of women. He said, “Zara Yacob believed in the
necessity of a matrimonial relationship between man and woman for the
continuity of the human species and he didn’t approve of the monastic way
of life. He also spoke against the domination of women by men.” (1991,
Wolde Hiwot also raised an important gender issue. He advocated the
necessity and superiority of marriage over monastic life. He said, “If you
lack a wife, look for one, and if you lack a husband, marry one: such is the
precept of the creator, who created man and women with the desire for
marriage. Don’t be like those fools who declare that marriage is impure.”
(Sumner 1985, P.275) According to him, monastic life destroys the order of
the creator and opposes the creation of our nature. According him, marriage
is the most beautiful and the greatest of all the mysteries of nature. And men
and women are equal after marriage, they become one and the same.
Moreover Wolde Hiwot can be taken as an extremely feminist because he
argued the need of mutual satisfaction even during conjugal acts. The man
has to keep the interest of his wife and the woman has to also keep the
interest of her husband. If there is no such mutual satisfaction, there will be
adultery so that greater care has to be taken for mutual satisfaction of
conjugal. He said, “Draw near your wife marveling at and praising your
creator, and when you sleep with her, don’t seek the pleasure of the conjugal
act for you alone, but render it also pleasant for your wife and don’t deprive
her of the portion of pleasure that God gave her: therefore, don’t be hasty,
but act, so that her pleasure will not remain less than yours or be weakened.”
(Sumner, 1985, P.278.). This shows that Wolde Hiwot attempted to solve the
problems of women in detail.
Ethiopia has its own unique and indigenous culture, language and
philosophy. Zara Yacob and Wold Hiwot were the two independent thinkers
of Ethiopian in the seventeenth century. They contributed their own
philosophical inquiry to the philosophy of their native country. They can be
considered as all rounded philosophers because they contributed their own
philosophical inquiry to each branches of philosophy-to metaphysics,
epistemology, ethics, aesthetics and logic. Like-Descartes, these
philosophers used methodological doubting and raised metaphysical
questions to prove the existence of God. They were not influenced by the
existed traditional faith of Christians or Muslims because for these
traditional religions God (Allah) is unquestionable transcendental reality
moreover; faith is the way to believe the existence of God (Allah) for these
religions. But Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot didn’t accept such blindly
acceptance of supernatural power. They doubted the existence of God as
well as the Holy Scriptures and other religious documents. Because of this it
is possible to say that these philosophers have their own Meta physical
foundation to prove the existence of one transcendental reality (God). They
also believed in the superiority of reason over faith. For them, faith could
become superiority to reason if and only if it fulfills the criterion of rational
reasoning and passes the test of critical examination. According to them,
reason and God are inseparable because God is embodied in absolute
reasonableness. And philosophical knowledge is endless phenomenon. Since
human being is not completely perfect, we have to strive for knowledge
continuously. Thus Zara Yacob and Wold Hiwot can be categorized under
rationalist philosophers in loosen sense, because they believed God as the
source of knowledge and this knowledge is acquired to some extent through
reasoning independent of sense experience.
Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot also contributed their own
philosophical inquiry to ethics and aesthetics. Almost all ethical principles
are included in the works of these philosophers. They agreed on the
necessity of altruism, which is the belief that every one ought as much as
possible to seek the good of others, to explain their guiding principles of
good personality. According to them, God doesn’t punish us on the account
of his becoming angry rather we punish because of our own violation of the
laws of God. Even though God is considered as religious as well as moral
lawgiver, He doesn’t deprive off our free will to calculate the consequence
of our action. Thus, we have the right to do good or bad, but if we do well
we will get our reward from God while we will punish after death for our
wrong dong if we do bad. In this sense, Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot can be
considered as utilitarian philosophers. They also admired the beauty of nature,
which is done orderly and purposely. Every thing in the universe is shaped
and ordered beautifully by their creator. For Wolde Hiwot, love is the basis
for every beautiful thing. It is perfect and real because of this it is more
valuable than any honorable things in this world, and it is also practicable.
He also criticized the traditional misconception of Artists (potters and
blacksmiths), as evil eye individuals. He appreciated these professions
because they are necessary for the survival of peasants in Ethiopia since most
of the tools used by these peasants are product of traditional artists. And
handicrafts can be also used as income generating activities. Zara Yacob and
Wolde Hiwot also used logic to reason out their thought throughout their
works. Logical reasoning is the central part of their philosophy. But they
didn’t formulate logical calculation of western system rather they used logic
to formulate their philosophical inquiry. In this sense, it is possible to say
that they used logical reasoning practically.
In addition to their contribution to different branches of philosophy,
Zara Yacob and Wolde Hiwot also contributed their philosophical inquiry to
gender issue. They tried to avoid the traditional view of women as the
servant of men. They also criticized the existed monastic life and
appreciated marriage as the order of God for the continuity of species. Thus,
men and women are equal because they are created with intelligence and
with other structures equally without any discrimination. Even though
gender issue seems more of sociological inquiry, it has philosophical
foundation and application. Moreover, some scholars from the west
criticized African philosophers since these philosophers didn’t raise any
gender issue in their philosophy. However, the works of Zara Yacob and
Wolde Hiwot can be taken as evidence to overcome such problems of
African philosophy in addition to solve the traditional views of gender
Belai Giday, 1991, Ethiopian Civilization, Addis Ababa, B.S.P.E., PP. 61-
Kraut, Richard (ed.). 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Chicago,
Cambridge University Press.
Maynard, Robert (ed.). 1952, Great Books of the Western World, Vol-31,
Descartes and Spinoza, Chicago, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.
Miller, Ed.L., 1884, Questions that Matter: an Invitation to philosophy. New
York, MCGRAW-Hill Book Company.
Sumner, Claude, 1985, Classical Ethiopian Philosophy, Addis Ababa,
Commercial Printing press.
Sumner, Claude, 1982, A Classical Ethiopian Naturalist; Interline, The
magazine of Ethiopian Airlines (last Quarter 1982), PP. 21-27.
Sumner, Claude, 1973, “A Thought Pattern of Ethiopian Philosophy,” XIV
world Congress of Philosophy, Verna, Bulgaria, Vol-5, PP.
Teodros Kiros (ed.), 2001, Explorations in African Thought. New York,
Workineh Kelbessa, 1994,
“Foreign Influence and its Impact on Ethiopian philosophy.” In
New Trends in Ethiopian Studies: Papers of the 12th
International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, Michigan State
University, 5-10 September 1994. Harold G. Marcus (edit.).
Vol-1: Humanities and Human Resources, Lawrence Ville, The
Red sea press, Inc. PP. 440-449.
Workineh Kelbessa, 1993, The African Source of Greek Philosophy:
(Journal of African Religion and Philosophy Vol. 2 No-2).
Your classical philosophical views are outdated. If you really want to upgrade, start of with the double-slit experiment:What does it mean to have a moral and ethical responsibility if we now understand that free will is just an Illusion ?
Quantum physics is not philosophy, but science. It is a hypothesis that has been experimentally verified.^^When did quantum physics become philosophy?
Things such as Existance, truth, God, the mind, the self consciousness, the collective consciousness, etc,,, can never be materially quantified and scientifically studied. In science , if something does not fit in the three dimension of space time and matter, it does not exist.Quantum physics is not philosophy, but science. It is a hypothesis that has been experimentally verified.
Philosophy does not require experimental verification, but its premises are based on well established facts. i.e. science.
So you really can't come up with a new philosophy if you don't use the latest in science. That is why I told daily he needs to update himself with Quantum Mechanics. Especially, if he is dealing with concepts such as free will.
ድንቅ ነገር ላልዬ። ከልቤ ነው የወደድኩት።The African Enlightenment | The highest ideals of Locke, Hume and Kant were first proposed more than a century earlier by an Ethiopian in a cave
posted on r/philosophy on reddit a week ago
Quantum Mechanics tells you that nothing is pre-determined in this World. If you freeze the state of the Universe, and then recreate it a couple of times from that frozen state, each recreation is not identical. That is not the case with classical physics. If you know the state of the universe at any given point, you know what the state of the Universe will be at any time in the future.Kibret.
I have no idea what morality and responsibility got do with Qunatum Physics. But My question was based on scientific understanding that we human make decisions and take actions without being conscious, meaning that we were predetermined to act in certain way by influences that are out of our control , it can be genetical, reasons , it can be social reasons(collective memory ) or other factors that we really dont have a say in influencing -we are conscious only after we have acted out any given actions and not before --ergo that Question what does it say about free will --is it not an illusion ?
Actually, Quantum Mechanics has a lot to say about consciousness. When not observed, an object can be in multiple mutually exclusive states at the same time. For example, if you don't see a light bulb, it is both off and on at the same time. Only when you make an observation does it chose to be either in the on or the off state. The observer in this case is the conscious entity.Things such as Existance, truth, God, the mind, the self consciousness, the collective consciousness, etc,,, can never be materially quantified and scientifically studied.
Existence is a very classical concept. In Quantum Mechanics, something can exist without you never being able to know where in the Universe it is. For example, if you know the speed of an object to an infinite precision, the object can be anywhere in the universe with equal probability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle).In science , if something does not fit in the three dimension of space time and matter, it does not exist.
What about what existence itself is ? not how something can exist, but what existence itself is? can science explain that? The universe or the multiverse itself exist within existence, that can be observed, so it can be quantified, in distance, in size and in time, but what does contain it all and observe it? Whatever that have a beginning must have an end too, if space, matter and time have beginning and endings, can they be the true essence of existence?Actually, Quantum Mechanics has a lot to say about consciousness. When not observed, an object can be in multiple mutually exclusive states at the same time. For example, if you don't see a light bulb, it is both off and on at the same time. Only when you make an observation does it chose to be either in the on or the off state. The observer in this case is the conscious entity.
Existence is a very classical concept. In Quantum Mechanics, something can exist without you never being able to know where in the Universe it is. For example, if you know the speed of an object to an infinite precision, the object can be anywhere in the universe with equal probability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle).
You are thinking about existence in classical (non-quantum) terms, where observation is equal to state. In quantum mechanics, observation is not equal to state. For example, you only observe a light bulb as either on or off, however, until you observe the light bulb, it is both on and off at the same. The chance with which you observe the bulb being on is determined by probability.What about what existence itself is ? not how something can exist, but what existence itself is? can science explain that? The universe or the multiverse itself exist within existence, that can be observed, so it can be quantified, in distance, in size and in time, but what does contain it all and observe it? Whatever that have a beginning must have an end too, if space, matter and time have beginning and endings, can they be the true essence of existence?
Yes, that is not science, because there is no experiment out there to prove it. It is simply philosophy.kibret.
I hope you are not one of thous who are into Quantum mysticism -You know thous who relate consciousness, intelligence and spirituality or mystical world view to the ideas of Quantum mechanics.I am sorry but that is not science.
At the end of the day, human behavior is completely described with what happens in the physical world. And the physical world is at the fundamental level described by Quantum Mechanics. The chemical reactions in your brain that make you behave a certain way are Quantum Mechanical at the particle level.In a real World though.
There is no way to proof or suggest that Quantum indeterminacy have effect on human behavior.
There is no predetermination. This is an experimentally proven fact (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem).Even if we go by Quantum Theories - lets say parallel universes or Multiverse-- The choices you make in ur version of reality (universe ) were predetermined, by many factors.
You are thinking in very classical terms. You can't use words like exist. In quantum mechanics, you can never observe all the fundamental properties an object has with infinite precision (maximum accuracy) at the same time! So you don't even know it really exists at a specific time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle).There might be another version of reality (universe ) where another version of you has made a slightly different choice then Ur current reality but still the alternative reality , does not apply to you--- YOu are not the alternative version of your self. And you live in totally different universe and governed by different factors of life . your alternative self,- made thous choices due to differnt factors in his own reality and he was predetermined to take thous actions ,--- so much so he lives in entire different Universe then you.
Yes, it is an illusion. In reality, everything happens by chance. I only brought Quantum Mechanics into this discussion, because the concept of free will, if you want to be philosophical about it, does not exist in reality.As to free will..
Think about it without involving the neuroscientists or psychologists.which all of them will say and agree that free will is just an illusion...
If I reverse time to when you were a year old, and replay it, it is theoretically possible you will get different results. What counts at the end of the day is what you observe. This is totally determined by chance.Now
Did you decide whom ur parents are ? or which gene to inherent from them ? .
Did you decide ur looks ?
Did you decide which country,society class to be born into ?
could you effect ur Upbringing as a child --love of ur parents ? , traumas as a child ? --
Did you have in anyway influencing ur own personality growing up as a child ?
My friend ur entire thoughts and actions are determined entirely by ur genetic and social conditioning. It might seem at first blush, that many of the decisions you made later—during late childhood or adolescenc-----were based on free will, but that is not the case. The decisions you made during late childhood and adolescence were based on the tastes, opinions, and attitudes you had developed in your early childhood, and on those to which you were exposed through your family, friends, media, or the natural environment. And so on, which means that the decision you now make are based on the tastes, opinions and attitudes you have developed over the years or on those to which you are now exposed through contact with the external factors.