inb4 the start of moaning. People will now completely forget about their own moaning about the meaninglessness of friendlies and will start moaning on the new thing, just because it's a new thing. :lol:
Im generally against UEFA and FIFA and every decision they make, but im neutral to this idea. I don't really care. But I think my moaning about euro 2020 or the WCC 2022 is justified. However the only thing I can think of with this is its basically a smaller version on Euro 2020. Surely Euro 2020 will be devalued if exactly the same thing will happen the year before and the year after?inb4 the start of moaning. People will now completely forget about their own moaning about the meaninglessness of friendlies and will start moaning on the new thing, just because it's a new thing. :lol:
I very much doubt that.Its fair to say that with the semi finals and final held in the same venue, Wembley, San Siro, Luzhniki, Allianz, and SdF will be some of the first hosts. For the stadiums it will be more lucrative than the CL final.
Really? You think 3 games played at Wembley possibly including Germany, Spain, France and (England) in the space of a week will be less lucrative to the FA than a Champions League final? The final itself will probably have a very similar ticketing structure to a CL final, not to mention the financial windfall of all 3 games taken into account.I very much doubt that.
Only the semi finals and final are played at a neutral venue - a grand total of three games. You will still play 3 games at home, 3 games away in your division's group.That, my dear UEFA, is just rubbish. The whole point of this nations league is have competetive home games against one's equals. With the proposed format, however, these games will yet again be played at neutral venues read the far end of the continent.
These 3 home matches will be against lesser teams though. Just as it is now. I don't want the likes of Sweden or Cratia, but Italy, Spain, France, England and the Netherlands.Only the semi finals and final are played at a neutral venue - a grand total of three games. You will still play 3 games at home, 3 games away in your division's group.
I see what you're saying, but it will still result in far more high profile matches than today.These 3 home matches will be against lesser teams though. Just as it is now. I don't want the likes of Sweden or Cratia, but Italy, Spain, France, England and the Netherlands.
This was also one of the first things that came into my mind too. Then I remembered that in the last international break my home country (Romania) played Argentina. It was such a non-event that at half-time I switched over to France - Netherlands. Last year (I think) was the same for Romania - Uruguay.I like the idea in principle as it will mean a 'meaning' to the friendly games but i hope space is also left in the calender for the odd friendly with South American nations.
If there's a "big 7" of European football (Spain, Germany, Italy, France, Netherlands, Portugal and England), then the chances for at least another heavyweight in England's group are very high. (One of these 7 would though be paired with someone like Greece or Switzerland though.) There are exciting teams in the next "tier" though, like Belgium, Turkey or Croatia, plus in the case of England there are also the home nations rivals. Anyway, the difference between playing the same countries in meaningless and boring friendlies versus playing them in a competitive context set up in groups as tight as those of summer tournaments (compared to qualifying groups) should be obvious, in terms of either excitement generated or quality of football.These 3 home matches will be against lesser teams though. Just as it is now. I don't want the likes of Sweden or Cratia, but Italy, Spain, France, England and the Netherlands.
This has been mooted for a year. And what is a third party going to say when all 54 associations have voted for it? :nuts:Nobody knew of this 48 hours ago, and now they have cowardly voted for this league behind closed doors before any third-party could give any sort of critical input about it.
I hope this league fails.
That's actually a very good point.The point of friendlies is to allow national teams to experiment with different players, different configurations, against different teams of different continents.
Well im pretty sure the FA would rather hold 1 champions league final than 3 fairly irrelevant games between neutral nations. The demand for CL final tickets was immense, fans were willing to pay over a grand for seats. You would never get that sort of demand for international friendlies which don't involve England.Really? You think 3 games played at Wembley possibly including Germany, Spain, France and (England) in the space of a week will be less lucrative to the FA than a Champions League final? The final itself will probably have a very similar ticketing structure to a CL final, not to mention the financial windfall of all 3 games taken into account.