I don't know, why our post went missing. What people forget is, that there is not enough uranium to run much more power plants. in the last decades much of the used up uranium was from old warheads of rockets luckily unused in cold war.^^ I just say that the "BAD" is changing. There's always something which is worse than the thing before. I don't say that anything is false.
Why do most Germans think that nuclear power is bad and power plants must be closed immediately but in many other countries, e.g. France, much more people think that it's not that bad or even good? For instance good to slow down the climate change?
You could weigh what's worse. Climate change or a nuclear disaster..
I read in the newspaper an old man saying: but i know we learned in school how much energy is in a single gram of uranium, so it is a good thing!
Except the risks, it is not about how much energy is in a single gram, but how much you need to dig to get that gram, and that you need to enrich it afterwards. the price for uranium rises as for all other fuels, because costly fuel are avoided which evens the field.
I think it makes no sense to destruct functioning power plants (not energetical and not ecological) no matter if it are nuclear plants oder coal plants... i would just not built new ones. It the same as with throwing away cars to built some who emit less CO2, because the construction of new cars emits much more...