SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Fresno's Skyline?

  • 10

    Votes: 7 4.4%
  • 9.5

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8.5

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 8

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • 7.5

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • 7

    Votes: 7 4.4%
  • 6.5

    Votes: 5 3.1%
  • 6

    Votes: 9 5.7%
  • 5.5

    Votes: 19 11.9%
  • 5

    Votes: 22 13.8%
  • 4.5

    Votes: 11 6.9%
  • 4

    Votes: 26 16.4%
  • 3.5

    Votes: 10 6.3%
  • 3 or less

    Votes: 38 23.9%

Fresno - USA

17960 Views 117 Replies 100 Participants Last post by  Leonardo M. Gaz
Fresno, California, USA.

City Population: 464,000
Metro: 800,000


1 - 20 of 118 Posts
A bit small, but some nice looking older buildings there. 6.5/10
thats is a crappy skyline, < 3/10
It's skyline is weak for 464,000, It looks more like a city of 70,000. I give Fresno a 4.5
Unimpressive. 4.
464 000 people? I think it looks provincial... This skyline would be good for a city of 100 000.
5/10
7/10

Yeah, Fresno is almost hits over 500,000 soon.
Semi-average skyline. I give it a 6/10.
5/10

normal skyline
Haha. I've driven through fresno. It's crap. Even worse than it's skyline. 4.
6/10. Looks bad compared to other cities with the same population.
There's cities smaller than Fresno, "in city" population that has better looking skylines, for example:

Des Moines, IA (Pop. 198,682)
Dayton, OH (Pop. 166,179)
Akron, OH (Pop. 217,074)
Fort Lauderdale, FL (Pop. 152,397)
Bellevue, WA (Pop. 109,569)
Winston-Salem, NC (Pop. 185,776)

Population Source: U.S. Census Bureau
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/



I don't dislike Fresno's skyline, overall it is unique to itself. It has so much potential to be better for a city with that many inhabitants.
cfx68 said:
It's skyline is weak for 464,000, It looks more like a city of 70,000. I give Fresno a 4.5
My thoughts exactly...
4/10
small, unimpressive.

4.5/10
1 - 20 of 118 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top