Yep, from my point of view you are absolutely right, Istanbul05.
The Clyde should not become a long line of private property and a yuppie mecca where only the well paid get anywhere near large chunks of the riverside.
Of course, every flat/house/skyscraper needs it's own private property for the residents to use exclusively (when you pay so much you at least deserve some private land to go with it), but these areas should be set back from the river front, so that both the public and the resident can enjoy views and space beside the water.
The best example I can think of where this is the case is in Vancouver. All around the bay (which surrounds downtown on 3 sides), there is a large public walkway for everyone to use, and then slightly set back from this are the 20-30 story condo's. These condos have their own gardens and spaces which are slightly raised from the pedestrian areas, giving them the same view of the water (if not better) and their own private space away from the public. It seems to be a pretty good way of working it - everyone gets what they want.
So if people start building properties right on the riverside here in Glasgow, there is no space to have two separate areas for both parties, and this is a terrible flaw. At the end of the day, money talks, and so the residents will end up privatizing the land if developers keep on building so close to the riverside.
This, as we have said before, is absolutely unacceptable.