SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Havukoski, Vantaa, Finland

20382 Views 22 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  akietta
Hey!
Here's some pics from a suburb called Havukoski in my hometown Vantaa, Finland. Havukoski was planned to be a very dense and urban area and it has received a lot of attention for the urban planning which is very different from the typical Finnish forest-commiblock suburbs. Havukoski was built in the 70's and was supposed to become the commercial centre of the town. That never happened as it was never finished they way it was planned to be. Today it's one of the suburbs with the worst reputation here with social problems and cheap rental apartments. The area also has lots of student apartments. Hopefully the problems will change for the better as I think this is one of the most interestig suburbs we have and now finally after several years new development including a shopping centre and new apartments are being planned.

General plan from 1969:


Last summer:




This winter:

Here you see how unfinished the place is:


And now to the small area which was finished:




















The text says "Back to Life"


































































I hope you enjoyed!
See less See more
47
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
yep...vantaa is nothing but suburbs, but it´s concidered a city! It´s unbeliveable, Vantaa is more like a suburb of Helsinki...
I was very surprised how GREEN Vantaa is in spite of all the commieblocks it has and as one of the biggest cities in the country... but that goes for a lot of Helsinki suburbs as Espoo or Kerava etc.
immigrants mostly live there? was this planned by communists or something like that?
sorry to ask its just i dont know much about Finland's history
^^
The number of Immigrants there is pretty high compared to many other suburbs here, but it's mostly still Finns who live there. The problems come from the large amount of public housing. Finland was never under communist rule, but during the 60's and 70's there was a huge need for thousands of new apartments in the cities which led to a large amount of commieblocks being built. We have also unfortunately had mostly socialist and left-wing politicians running the city of Vantaa.

Kuesel said:
I was very surprised how GREEN Vantaa is in spite of all the commieblocks it has and as one of the biggest cities in the country...
That's true, Vantaa is very green. Most of the major residental areas here were built in the middle of forests and where no roads or houses was built forest was left untouched. Looking at this picture of Havukoski suburb shows pretty well how the houses are standing in the middle of the forest:


SuomiPoika said:
yep...vantaa is nothing but suburbs, but it´s concidered a city! It´s unbeliveable, Vantaa is more like a suburb of Helsinki...
It's true that a large part of the city is suburbs, but... uhh... :sleepy: It's officially a city even if it's just a bordertown of Helsinki, it's the fourth largest in Finland, has a job self-sufficiency of over 100%, the largest airport in Finland and the largest retail areas, it's the logistic center of the nation and has the fastest growing business area in Finland. Keep in mind how young Vantaa is, it's grown from 15 000 inhabitants in 1950's to 190 000 today. It's far more unbelievable that some small villages on the countryside have decleared themselves as towns. Sorry, I'm very biased when it comes to Vantaa ;)
See less See more
From the above pic, Vantaa is more like the poorest-planned city in Finland. Despite the presence of vegetation, the blocks are not maintained well and filled with mostly lower-middle class Finns and immigrants.
^^ I could show you similar pics of suburbs in Helsinki, Espoo, Tampere, Turku or any other big Finnish city. That pics shows one suburb in the east part of Vantaa and doesnt represent the whole city. The pic above shows how poorly any suburb in any Finnish city is planned. Besides these areas are very young (around 30 years), it takes a long time and several years of new development for these places to actually start looking like something and as I mentioned, this particular suburb was never finished, it's still only half-done. :sleepy:

Here's other pics of Vantaa:
new area under construction:


Tikkurila (a local center along the main railroad)


The airport also covers a huge part of the city.


as you can see, one suburb doesn't represent the whole city. Vantaa is far from poorly planned, it's not beautiful, but it's just very young and hasn't had the time to develop a good city structure.
See less See more
3
PC said:
new area under construction:


The airport also covers a huge part of the city.


as you can see, one suburb doesn't represent the whole city. Vantaa is far from poorly planned, it's not beautiful, but it's just very young and hasn't had the time to develop a good city structure.
The new area of Vantaa looks like some upper middle-class suburb--- it's much better than Havukoski. And it looks like another sort of newer type of commieblocks with German/Swiss influence.
Xäntårx said:
From the above pic, Vantaa is more like the poorest-planned city in Finland. Despite the presence of vegetation, the blocks are not maintained well and filled with mostly lower-middle class Finns and immigrants.
Are you saying those buildings are in a bad condition? Aside from their ugly looks and a few graffiti sketches, those buildings seem to be in excellent condition.

Vantaa is more like the poorest-planned city in Finland.
With this I agree. It's basically like a huge suburb with no city center. But one must understand that it became a city (population wise) in the 60' and the 70's and I don't know any european country that had a good city planning in those days. Google Earth reveals this quite handsomely.
You also have to keep in mind that Vantaa is a satellite-city of Helsinki. It's a part of the Helsinki metropolitan area and that way the only real traditional city center you are expected to find in this area is that of Helsinki. The only city you can compare Vantaa to is Espoo as they are the only cities of this kind in Finland. Now if you look at how it's planned as a satellite city there's nothing poor in it. In this comparison Vantaa is very well planned with it's residental areas centered along the railroads and with respect to how well it has preserved it's historical areas makes it serve it's purpose more that well. It has also become completely self-reluctant with a job self-sufficiency of over 100%. The economical problems it's been facing are not because the city wouldn't be able to survive alone, but due to the constant need of building services to a city whose population has practically been exploding and the fact that it's ranked among the most self-reluctant areas in Finland and has to pay a huge amount of money from it's tax-incomes to sustain the dying countryside of Finland. IMO coparing Vantaa with other Finnish cities and saying it's poorly planned because it doesn't have a city center or because it's just a suburb living on Helsinki and bla bla bla is just ignorant - it's like comparing apples with oranges.

Vantaa is just ugly due to the fact of how in-the-middle-of-development it still is, it has nothing to do with how the city itself has been planned.
See less See more
That's only partly true... while Espoo and Vantaa are real basic full-planned Garden Cities most of the post-war reurbanization in Finnland ended up in a common style of architecture and city plannning... see below.

The sad thing: On one of my visits I met an old German couple complaining about the boring modern Finnish cities and that there is no Old Towns remaining... omg, that's sad - they were old enough to know the historical background. And at least there is still Rauma ;)

Rovaniemi


Jyväskylä


Mikkeli


Tampere (although - one of my fav Suomi cities)
See less See more
4
Kuesel said:
The sad thing: On one of my visits I met an old German couple complaining about the boring modern Finnish cities and that there is no Old Towns remaining... omg, that's sad - they were old enough to know the historical background. And at least there is still Rauma ;)

Rovaniemi
I don't think that's sad, but I think American sprawls usually "looks more comfortable" than European commieblocks in the suburb. Yet Commieblock itself, it's a different type of architecture, and it's beautiful, if it's well-maintained and well-designed. In smaller Finnish cities with commieblocks, generally the social status of commieblock districts are a bit better than Helsinki or Tampere. And in Oulu the commieblock neighbourhood are rather nice. Tampere is one of the better Finnish city, when compared with Greater Helsinki (Not the core of Helsinki!), and it's very industrial. Rovaniemi? I've never been there but it looks like some sort of modern-planned city up Lappland. (Is that called Lappland architecture? I don't know anything about Lappland, though I personally fond of it)

Here in Bismarck, North Dakota, I couldn't find any pics of commieblocks. But I would start a thread with a commieblock-like project in Quebec, not Canada.
See less See more
Ahh..first time I've ever seen a Finnish ghetto.
aplz said:
Ahh..first time I've ever seen a Finnish ghetto.
What do you mean? There are probably more SSC members than foreigners in Finnland ;) There are probably no Ethnic Ghettos in this country. And if you mean "slum" I have to disappoint you - The finnish cities are very clean and even sterile even in the outskirts. But the architecture is indeed a bit boring - apart from some unique structures (I love Alvar Aalto for example ;)).
Kuesel said:
What do you mean? There are probably more SSC members than foreigners in Finnland ;) There are probably no Ethnic Ghettos in this country. And if you mean "slum" I have to disappoint you - The finnish cities are very clean and even sterile even in the outskirts. But the architecture is indeed a bit boring - apart from some unique structures (I love Alvar Aalto for example ;)).
There are some parts of Espoo, Vantaa, Helsinki or Tampere has serious graffiti and crime problems--- but Ethnic Ghettos is rare --- even from its neighbouring Russia or Estonia--- they simply live together in the city, not separating each other, very much like the situation in Switzerland or some cities in Canada. And, generally Finnish cities are very safe when compared to Russian or American cities.

Alvar Aalto is for sure a great architect, but unique residential structure in Finland is quite rare (Apart from the elite mansions).
i think that these building are no commies, that is a quite usual residential architecture in any city european city

Yeah, but what is one supposed to expect. We got rich after the war, and people wanted better living conditions instead of living in flammable wooden houses with no water and no electricity. Central european counties had more older and historically important cities and were more proud of them. The key is, that they made their houses from bricks or stone, which made them more expensive to bulldoze. The stone/brick buildings in Finland didn't suffers nearly as much as did the wooden ones. Finns though the wooden cities had no historical value (wood was cheap material unlike stone or brick), and were pretty satisfied to get rid of them. Of cource we, the younger generation, really don't understand that sort of mentality, where our built history is destroyed by 97%.

Workers' homes in Tampere.


Street scene from Helsinki.


A Rare Kalevala (Karelian) influenced building in Oulu that once worked as a library. Nice display of woodcraft btw.


Survivor...
See less See more
5
I wouldn't consider Havukoski much of a "ghetto". There are just 4 "towers" (the pictures here manage to fool one quite easily) and then some other low-rises (very typical in Finland). ;)
The word "ghetto" can't really be used anywhere in Finland. These commieblocks seem to be in an excellent condition to me.
628.8m♣TV mast;8723521 said:
I don't think that's sad, but I think American sprawls usually "looks more comfortable" than European commieblocks in the suburb. Yet Commieblock itself, it's a different type of architecture, and it's beautiful, if it's well-maintained and well-designed. In smaller Finnish cities with commieblocks, generally the social status of commieblock districts are a bit better than Helsinki or Tampere. And in Oulu the commieblock neighbourhood are rather nice. Tampere is one of the better Finnish city, when compared with Greater Helsinki (Not the core of Helsinki!), and it's very industrial. Rovaniemi? I've never been there but it looks like some sort of modern-planned city up Lappland. (Is that called Lappland architecture? I don't know anything about Lappland, though I personally fond of it)
The story about Rovaniemi (and the rest of the Finnish Lapland) is that the German army burnt and razed northern Finland after the Finnish-Soviet peace in late 1944. Wehrmacht did however let the civilian population escape to Sweden, the German motive was just a way to inflict as much material damage to their former allied as possible. The Finns were also hemmed by the fact that they couldn´t send their own army to Lapland because of a disarmament clause in the treaty with Soviet so they had to send new younger recruits to the front, which meant it took a very long time for the Finns to pursuit the Germans across the border to Norway.


After the war Rovaniemi was rebuilt after a plan Alvaro Aalto had laid out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapland_war
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top