I think things are to be started with the basics. It is not as easy as it appears down here.
First remove the rogue driver from the roads.
Repair all 'shamba like' roads (minor arterial and collector roads) e.g. Parkroad which is so full of potholes:bash: , Ngara road, likoni road etc.
Mark all the roads and put proper road signs(remember now we don't have a rogue driver and also a rogue cop- a rogue cop goes down with a rogue driver)
Synchronize all working traffic lights and install new where they are necessary.
Remove all traffic police from the roundabouts/junction and place them as patrol cops on major roads. After all, a roundabout with traffic lights does not require a traffic police, it requires may be a traffic light maintenance crew and proper-thinking drivers.
Then this is where mega projects begins;- superhighways, tunnels, elevated roads, BRT systems, the commuter train service at every known estate etc
Here is what Gavin Bennett suggested at Christmas time:-
http://www.aakenya.co.ke/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=42&Itemid=73
Sorry to bother you today; I know you’re quite busy just now.
But I wonder if, while you are in the area, you could drop off just three little presents - one down the chimney of Traffic Police Headquarters, one to the Chief Engineer (Roads) and another to the Attorney General's Chambers. I promise you that if you could do just these three ever so small and ever so simple things, you will make 40 million (approx) people very happy.
This is what is needed, and this is the effect it will have:
To the AG's office, please take a copy of legislation governing the operation of "Clearways" - roads on which it is absolutely forbidden to stop, under any circumstances. Ideally, the text would make every road in Kenya a Clearway, and impose really big penalties (and I mean Big - like your tummy, or castration, or queuing in a government office) for any motorist who stops on the road at any time or any place - other than:
* at a Stop street
* in a designated parking place
* where it is dangerous not to stop (eg junctions)
* where, for whatever reason, all traffic has come to a halt.
The text should also allow the same penalties to be imposed on any vehicle which is not obstructed but which is moving at much less than the ambient speed of other traffic.
The logic here is that a vehicle moving at walking pace on a road where other vehicles are travelling at between 80 and 100 kph is as obstructive and dangerous as if it were standing still.
We already have laws which insist that vehicles must be roadworthy and not overloaded, and it is reasonable to presume that any vehicle that cannot progress at 60 kph or more on an open road MUST be either faulty or overloaded.
If an articulated truck can't do 60 kph, then either it is the wrong vehicle for the job it is being asked to do, or there is something the matter with it. If a car can't do 60 kph, then the driver has either lost his way or lost his mind.
Now, to make these systems practicable, we are going to need proper hard-stands/lay-bys for bus stops and for vehicles with a mechanical problem or any other reason for "stopping" along the way.
Many roads have a wide enough and hard enough shoulder for this purpose, but where the roadside is too narrow, or too boggy, or consists of a deep ditch, lay-bys would have to be built. For this the Chief Engineer will need a Christmas present of a few thousand tonnes of rocks (known as hard-core in the building trade).
To inform the motoring public of the new "Clearway" rules, a few signposts would also be helpful. For goodness' sake, Santa, not the normal "Clearway" signs of a red X on a blue circle. Those are much too difficult to recognise and remember.
What we need are huge white squares, with black writing that says: KEEP LEFT AND KEEP GOING OR GET OFF! (You may wish to substitute more approprite word for "Get").
To enforce this, the Traffic Police need a present that costs nothing. What they need is a mandate to devote any and all resources to enforcing the "Clearway" principle, before, above and even instead of any other rule of the Traffic Act/Highway Code.
The effect of this "Clearway" campaign would be dramatic.
* Immediately, traffic on all roads would start to move like a conveyor belt, with the great majority of vehicles traveling at the same speed.
* The need for overtaking (a prime cause of frustration, danger and accidents) would be very greatly reduced.
* Even at much lower ambient speeds, people would get to their
destinations faster. Cruising at 80 kph, steadily, is much faster than roaring at 110 and frequently stopping or crawling because of an obstruction. Steady speeds are also far more economical on fuel consumption and all other wear and tear.
In a short time, there would also be indirect benefits:
In well ordered traffic systems, motorists know that if they come across a slow-moving queue that there is a good reason for the blockage, and everybody is taking their turn to go through.
In Kenya, the reason for the blockage is often crass, unnecessary selfishness or incompetence which less patient drivers try to zoom past. When they do, others copy.
The upshot is an impatient, selfish and often incompetent motoring culture, which is translated - in dozens of different ways - into injury and death. Removal of obstructions would start to reverse this trend. The road safety implications are tremendous.
In summary, the "Clearway" principle would have greater beneficial effect on reducing congestion, reducing accidents, and improving general road conduct than any other single measure. Of course, buses full of passengers traveling at speeds way above either the vehicle's or the driver's ability are a deadly menace, but this should not disguise the oh-so obvious fact that, in general, slow and stationary vehicles are a far, far greater danger and cause of accidents than fast ones.
The need for really severe penalties on transgressors of the "Clearway" principle cannot be over-emphasised. The old axiom that the "punishment should fit the crime" is a load of bunkum. It presupposes a 100 per cent level of catch-prosecute-convict to balance the books.
In practice, "the punishment should be the reciprocal of the likelihood of being caught" to act as a deterrent. We will never be able to monitor all the roads all the time to prevent motorists stopping, selfishly, dangerously and needlessly, in the middle of the road.
If we covered 1 per cent of the problem we would be doing well. It follows that the punishment should be 100 times as severe as the crime.
That would be equitable. And, that would, verily, be Christmas!
So, Santa, a law, some rocks, some signs and some commitment. That's all we ask. Please.