It has.Another hypothetical thread. I'm sure this topic has probably been done to death
Well... this happenedbut Melbourne certainly looks and feels like an Olympic city
I was thinking this not long ago. Melbourne should have seized the opportunity to bid for EXPO 2020. I think anywhere along that Footscray Road corridor is perfect for that kind of event.Screw the Olympics, I'd prefer an Expo - longer lasting facilities and FAR longer exposure.
E-GATE: Expo site.
That is all.
If you're going to be a smart arse, keep it to yourself. Melbourne deserves another Olympic games. That the sporting capital of the world hasn't hosted it for that long is a disgrace.It has.
Well... this happened
![]()
It's these kinds of ridiculous sweet nothings that makes this kind of discussion with people of your mentality tiring.If you're going to be a smart arse, keep it to yourself. Melbourne deserves another Olympic games. That the sporting capital of the world hasn't hosted it for that long is a disgrace.
Where will the money come from? It's not like the IOC gives a multi-billion dollar grant? Aside from the Airport Link (even then...) none of the projects you have mentioned would aid Melbourne in any way at all staging the Olympics. Thats why Melbourne reigns supreme with the likes of London, Paris and NY for sporting prowess - we really do not need THAT much more infrastructure to pull it off. An Airport Link would happen anyway - with or without the Olympics.A good thing about hosting the Olympics is that it would force the building of infrastructure that Melbourne so desperately needs, i.e. underground rail, east-west tunnel, airport rail link, airport and train station upgrades etc.
It's not about the games IMO but about the building program and economic spin-offs that comes with hosting such an event.
Well we were sporting capital of the world. But as the post below you it says London have overtaken us. London just happen to be hosting the Olympics this year! What a coincidence...Alphaville said:It's these kinds of ridiculous sweet nothings that makes this kind of discussion with people of your mentality tiring.
Sporting capital of the world? Self appointed? What about London? Melbourne deserves what? Why? A disgrace? lol! If you're going to wax on with baseless sentimentality can you keep it to yourself?
Agree with the above. Seriously, the Olympic games will give you 1 million times the exposure EXPO will while also forcing the Government(s) into upgrading and constructing things. I could hold EXPO in my garage truth be told.Qantas743 said:A good thing about hosting the Olympics is that it would force the building of infrastructure that Melbourne so desperately needs, i.e. underground rail, east-west tunnel, airport rail link, airport and train station upgrades etc.
It's not about the games IMO but about the building program and economic spin-offs that comes with hosting such an event.
The cost of the Olympics is exactly why many cities will struggle to justify bidding in future years. The security costs and issues alone are enough to stop the idea in it's tracks.Agree with the above. Seriously, the Olympic games will give you 1 million times the exposure EXPO will while also forcing the Government(s) into upgrading and constructing things. I could hold EXPO in my garage truth be told.
You weren't referring to the Ultimate Sports City ranking initially though, you were regurgitating the tired old Melbourne idea that it's the World's Sporting Capital. It's a dumb idea, and its irrelevant. If anything you appear arrogant and expectant. The IOC owes Melbourne nothing. Zilch. Fact is Australia just hosted in 2000. For a nation of our size to have hosted twice in less than 50 years is a big slice of the cake.Well we were sporting capital of the world. But as the post below you it says London have overtaken us. London just happen to be hosting the Olympics this year! What a coincidence...
Well the fact that 2012 will be their third Olympics cannot be ignored; and I don't really believe you can rank cities this way, but so you can make up your own mind... have a lookWhat have London got that we don't anyway? Apart from the Olympics, serious question?
Can you cut the cringe worthy aggression? If you don't like the responses to the questions you are asking then why start a thread?As Ricky Bobby would say: "With all due respect.." mate, you seem like a massive flog.
But as I asked QF743 - where will the funding come from?Agree with the above. Seriously, the Olympic games will give you 1 million times the exposure EXPO will while also forcing the Government(s) into upgrading and constructing things. I could hold EXPO in my garage truth be told.
Yep - just look at the decline of cities even applying to officially bid for the Olympics since 2008 was decided early last decade:The cost of the Olympics is exactly why many cities will struggle to justify bidding in future years.
Simple reason its dropped so low since 2008, what happened in 08, the world went into financial meltdown. Even the British IOC said had they known the financial crisis was coming they wouldn't have even placed a bid knowing what it was going to cost. But it seems they'll get most of their money back from it.Yep - just look at the decline of cities even applying to officially bid for the Olympics since 2008 was decided early last decade:
2008 - 10 applicant cities
2012 - 9 applicant cities
2016 - 7 applicant cities
2020 - just FIVE applicant cities - might be narrowed down to just two or three tomorrow. This will be the lowest number of Candidate Cities for an Olympics since Seoul bid for 1988 with only Nagoya challenging them. The Olympics is still an immensely successful event, but in recent years many cities get last minute cold feet. It wouldn't suprise me if Australia mounted a bid in the next 10 years, but then dropped it do to the shit storm that would no doubt erupt when the cost became apparent. A lot has changed since the Sydney 2000 era.