The council are currently welcoming public consultation on the Longbridge Area Action plan. In many ways it might have been better if Nanjing had abandoned the site and not reinvested in Longbridge because their retained facilities divide the site in two and therefore reduce the flexibility of the Action Plan. Specifically it means that the council have to chose between making an employment led (Regional Investment site) regeneration or a town centre mixed use led regeneration as there isn't enough land to do both.
That said the retention of Longbridge will be a good thing if they keep growing the work force there over time. This is what the area action plan says although frankly i doubt they will reach the expected 4,500 jobs by the end of the 15 year period that they believe Nanjing can support. That sounds like pie in the sky when you consider the 250 jobs being created there with the restart of production.
You can see and comment on the Preferred Option by following the link below:
http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/Genera...CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=12232&EXPAND=1636
That said the retention of Longbridge will be a good thing if they keep growing the work force there over time. This is what the area action plan says although frankly i doubt they will reach the expected 4,500 jobs by the end of the 15 year period that they believe Nanjing can support. That sounds like pie in the sky when you consider the 250 jobs being created there with the restart of production.
You can see and comment on the Preferred Option by following the link below:
http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/Genera...CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=12232&EXPAND=1636