Skyscraper City Forum banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Penguin fancier
Joined
·
4,073 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
So, to start with, who would you say has done the best job of leading this city in the past 20 years?

Sir Peter Soulsby (1995 - 99, 2011 - present)
Ross Wilmott (1999 - 2003, 2004 - 05 and 2007 - 10)
Roger Blackmore (2003 - 04, 2005 - 07)
Vijay Patel (2010 - 11)
 

·
LCC what is it good for?
Joined
·
225 Posts
So, to start with, who would you say has done the best job of leading this city in the past 20 years?

Sir Peter Soulsby (1995 - 99, 2011 - present)
Ross Wilmott (1999 - 2003, 2004 - 05 and 2007 - 10)
Roger Blackmore (2003 - 04, 2005 - 07)
Vijay Patel (2010 - 11)
Peter Soulsby in my opinion. Whilst Ross Wilmott oversaw Highcross and Curve, which are brilliant don't get me wrong, I think alot more could have been done during his time in office. The Science Park stood still for a decade and Historical Leicester pretty much fell to pieces under him. Soulsby has fast tracked alot of projects under financial difficulty that needed to happen, like the Market and the Haymarket Bus station. Under him Leicester is finally making more of its heritage which was always needed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,426 Posts
So, to start with, who would you say has done the best job of leading this city in the past 20 years?

Sir Peter Soulsby (1995 - 99, 2011 - present)
Ross Wilmott (1999 - 2003, 2004 - 05 and 2007 - 10)
Roger Blackmore (2003 - 04, 2005 - 07)
Vijay Patel (2010 - 11)
Sir Peter Soulsby by a long way. He is pushing the change that has been needed for a while.
 

·
Dilly ding! Dilly dong!
Joined
·
3,194 Posts
I'm inclined to agree with those who would say Sir Peter. He's by no means faultless, but has showed on many occasions that he shares many of our hopes and opinions here at SSC and that can't be a bad thing :D

When his time in office comes to an end he will at least have left Leicester a better City.
 

·
Leicester - why not?
LE5
Joined
·
14,529 Posts
Sir Peter definitely has helped the city. However I'm not sure about the all the pedestrianisation schemes, though around the Old Town it looks so much better. I hope he has plans for replacing the broken slabs near the Clock Tower, as they look very bad.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
10,813 Posts
SPS all the way.

I want to know who allowed Victoria Halls to be built? SPS said it wouldn't have been allowed on his watch. Who is guilty?
 

·
Leicester - why not?
LE5
Joined
·
14,529 Posts
The worst aspect of the Victoria Halls was the 'tower' part which was placed in a totally unapporpriate part of the scheme and one of the few places from which St Mary's Spire could be seen in the city centre.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
10,813 Posts
So Willmott is guilty then!

In fact a poster on another thread said that Victoria Hall was refused by planners and Willmott stepped in to push it through.

Page 7 on the above link, shows that Willmott challenged the original refusal.

His written objection to refusal, is on page 23.

GUILTY!!!
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
10,813 Posts
One of the joint applicants was DMU, so they are also to blame for the monstrosity.

SPS is in danger of repeating history on the other side of Southgates though...
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
10,813 Posts
Perhaps a few of the students have a drink or bite to eat in town? But that isn't regeneration really is it.

All Victoria Hall has offered is an out of character, cheaply built, ugly building - right in the middle of Leicester's historic core. With an unused ground floor and it also blocks views between the two parts of the Old Town.

It is as bad, if not worse than the Holiday inn. At least the hotel brings in business income to the city centre and is a recognised brand.

Leicester learned ziltch from the 1960s and 1970s and Willmott is to blame. SPS must carry the can if the other Southgates fiasco gets the thumbs up.
 

·
Leicester - why not?
LE5
Joined
·
14,529 Posts
Regeneration is meant to mean something which enhances an area for the local community. Most students will not become permanent city residents. Student accommodation has never and will never enhance anything for the city as a whole, though it could look ok, its impact will hardly be felt by your average Leicesterian. Again it comes back to building schemes which are both visually attractive and beneficial to city residents/visitors like better leisure facilities, etc.

I hope SPS gets the New Walk Centre scheme right or else it will not do his ratings any good!
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top