SkyscraperCity Forum banner

London Skyscrapers - Proposed But Never Built

3756 Views 9 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  cnapan
A great video of some of the proposed skyscrapers that were never built in London.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18204250
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
The Westminster one should be built now.

It's a shame we won't ever get large monuments built again, as they provide no value to investors.
That is depressing...I can't even imagine how much more incredible London would be if they were built, especially the westminster and the crystal palace one
That is depressing...I can't even imagine how much more incredible London would be if they were built, especially the westminster and the crystal palace one
The imperial tower was by far the most interesting never built towers. The cost I would suspect be very high but what an asset to London if it ever were to be built....we can but dream...sigh.
See less See more
This thread is similar to an earlier one http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=410017 its a great read and covers many of these proposals
That is depressing...I can't even imagine how much more incredible London would be if they were built, especially the westminster and the crystal palace one
Though you wonder how much they would have been targets during WWII
The one on the embankment is my favourite...they should build it now
I wonder what stance English Heritage would have on a highrise building built now that, had it been built at the time of being proposed, would probably now be a cherished historical building
Not a fan of the 1950's plan for the South Bank, but my concern would have for the Westminster Tower.....I suspect part of the reason it didn't go ahead was that it would, looking at the video a little closer, have meant the partial demolition of Westminster Abbey most notably the Lady Chapel and Shrine of Edward the Confessor as well as the Chapter House. Something I think would horrify even the most niave planner these days.....
See less See more
It's great to see ideas for tall buildings that don't conform to the lazy assumptions of what a tall building must look like.

It reminds me a little of the amazing pictures of New York in the first decades of the 20th century, where the tallest buildings weren't afraid of showing a bit of attention to detail and design flair.

Today, such 'fripperies' are firmly ejected as some sort of architectural heresy. We must lap up our bland floor-to-ceiling glass cladding and lump it, even though it's hardly 'modern' any more as they've been buildings like this for decades now.
See less See more
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top