SkyscraperCity banner

10981 - 11000 of 11658 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
5,283 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
MVP's road is more suited for NLEx - SLEx direct travel bypassing MM

RSA's road is more suited for in-city - MM travel [pero sana nagkaron to ng connection sa meh Aurora Blvd / SM Sta. Mesa area.]
Correct - although in most countries, in-city urban expressways are mostly free of charge (or use open toll systems such as RFID gantries). Toll plazas serve as traffic choke points and are actually redundant if RFID is to be pushed in the future.

A southbound offramp should've been constructed just before Aurora Blvd as well. And you can eliminate ROW problems by constructing the ramp in the middle of the viaduct (again, as in many other countries).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
May chance pa naman siguro lagyan ng exit pa-Aurora. Since napansin ko sa exits ng Skyway may toll plazas, pwedeng yung connection nito papuntang Connector ang lagyan ng toll plaza then magkakaroon ng 2 ways, a one lane ramp that leads to Aurora following the original alignment then magseseparate ulit sa V. Mapa banda yung isa papuntang Kalentong at yung isa papuntang Aurora. Instead of passing directly towards N. Domingo, na papuntang SM Santa Mesa, doon na lang nila padaanin sa V. Mapa. Since one lane ramp lang ito, I think hindi naman ganun kalaki ang problema sa Right of Way.

To summarize what I'm proposing, mas magiging makabuluhan yung connection nito sa Connector kung magkakaroon pa ng exits leading to roads I've mentioned. Para kasing imposible na lagyan sa San Juan River kasi sarado na siya ulit at gawa na ang Sevilla Bridge. The toll plaza I'm proposing will be built on the Pasig River Crossing area before the two expressways separate their ways. Hitting two birds in one stone.

attached pic for guide:
View attachment 635947
Exactly. The NLEX SLEx connector should make an off ramp for Sta Mesa area, to compensate for the lack thereof in the MMS3. That way, cars coming from NLex or SLex need not take the Skyway G Araneta route anymore, but just follow the Connector route.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,303 Posts
wow! They are planning a network of expressway for the NMIA.. thanks @jaredcadz for sharing! Now I know that the skyway will be extended to NMIA but different route (I thought that the extension will be just above the NLEX stretch until marilao).
the NMIA project includes rail link separate from the MALOLOS-TUTUBAN PNR Link
 

·
Registered Follower
Joined
·
890 Posts
Exactly. The NLEX SLEx connector should make an off ramp for Sta Mesa area, to compensate for the lack thereof in the MMS3. That way, cars coming from NLex or SLex need not take the Skyway G Araneta route anymore, but just follow the Connector route.
My thoughts as well. Might as say, hindi pa tapos at may plan naman "siguro" na gawaan nga naman ng ramp papuntang Aurora. Ang layo ng difference ng Nagtahan to Quezon Avenue. A ramp going to Aurora Boulevard will also decongest Magsaysay Boulevard. Pero sana may exit din sa may Shaw kaya ang ginawa ko sa drawing, doon as V.Mapa sila maghihiwalay, yung isa pakanan (To Shaw) yung pakaliwa, papuntang Aurora. Bitin kasi kung intersection na naman ang dulo ng ramp. Mas maganda iwasan yung stoplights kasi kapag stoplights dulo ng ramp, wala rin traffic din yan...

Kaya ang nasa isip ko, yung old render ni SMC sa Skyway 3 na may toll plaza near Pasig River and Connector Road interchange, pwedeng gamitin dito. Yung toll gate magsisilbing separator ng 2 systems. After paying toll, ikaw na bahala, Connector or Aurora/Shaw exit. Medyo imposible na rin kasi gawaan ng exit along San Juan River. Pansin ko sa exits ng Skyway may toll plaza and that factor is what I considered in drafting the said alignment.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
16,461 Posts
I think that will be solved by the proposed NLEX-CAVITEX Port Expressway. Trucks going from NLEX to SLEX will use NLEX Segment 10 all the way to CAVITEX Segment 2 & 3 (aka C5 Link Expressway) and then SLEX
But also how to implement that with destroying Roxas Boulevard.

Certainly an overhead highway over Roxas is a NIMBY.

Building it underground is better but Manila’s soil stability is questionable.
 

·
Beautiful User
Joined
·
2,153 Posts
^Manila could certainly adopt those infrastructure done in Japan, China or Taiwan which are prone to similar seismic activity like ours. Engineers has gone a long way in mitigating geographic areas prone to earthquake, liquefaction, land subsidence and rising sea-level/flooding. The main issue now is the cost.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,653 Posts
Yun abang na iyan ay under SMC para sa double deck viaduct with on/off ramp sa may dulo ng paco sta mesa road. Yun abang para sa Connector Road gagawin sa may PUP, sta mesa. unless nagchange ang plano, ito ay base sa nakita kong draft noong 2019.
 

·
Registered Follower
Joined
·
890 Posts
After Skyway Stage 3 is done (mainline) as in lahat lahat, start na rin kaya agad sila sa Connection papuntang Connector?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,962 Posts
Yun abang na iyan ay under SMC para sa double deck viaduct with on/off ramp sa may dulo ng paco sta mesa road. Yun abang para sa Connector Road gagawin sa may PUP, sta mesa. unless nagchange ang plano, ito ay base sa nakita kong draft noong 2019.
Iba na ngayon yung abang na yan..

Hanggang dyan na yung dulo ng connector based sa final plan. Kasi ang nangyari nag iba ng ruta ang skyway S3, si connector na yung lalapit sa Yamamura warehouse imbes na si SMC ang lalapit sa bandang sta.mesa
 
10981 - 11000 of 11658 Posts
Top