Considering it will be no.4 or even no.3 in population by then, ranking in the top 15 for economic size is not impressive at all. It will be less than 1/3 as rich as Japan is today (per person).
Ratings agency Moody’s published a statement last week on Nigeria’s rebased GDP of $510 billion, which it estimates would surge to $4.5 trillion by 2050.
Moody’s which has a Ba3 stable rating on Nigeria said that the rebasing exercise was supportive of assessing the nations sovereign credit profile, although it does not change the government’s nominal stock of outstanding debt, nor its revenue generation capacity to service that debt.
“With a population of 170 million and oil reserves estimated at around 37.2 trillion barrels (or roughly 28 percent of total African reserves), Nigeria is likely to number among the world’s 15 largest economies by 2050 when GDP is projected to exceed $4.5 trillion in purchasing power parity terms,” said Aurelien Mali, VP-Senior Analyst, Moody’s.
“From a credit standpoint, the revised GDP estimates allow a better understanding of the Nigerian economy and its underlying resilience.”
The rebasing of Nigeria’s GDP follows similar rebasing exercises by more than a dozen other African countries over the past decade, resulting in a range of revisions of national output, from an 11 percent reduction in the case of Botswana (A2 stable) to a 66 percent increase in the case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (B3 stable).
Moody’s notes that in Nigeria’s case, the GDP revision is more spectacular as it means the country has now overtaken South Africa to become the largest economy in Africa, with its ranking among global economies jumping from 36th to 28th, with an economy almost as large as that of the Netherlands.
Furthermore, the rebasing sees an improvement in several key credit ratios, including debt to GDP, which has declined from 19 percent to 11 percent for 2012, and interest payments to GDP.
The revision mostly impacted the services sector, which is now estimated to be 240 percent larger than previously thought, compared with agriculture (20 percent increase on previous estimate) and industry (34 percent).
It also revealed that Nigeria’s economy is more diverse than originally accounted for.
New industries are now recognized, including: food, beverages and tobacco, chemicals, chemical products and pharmaceutical products, arts, and entertainment and recreation.
Consequently, agriculture’s share of GDP in 2013 shrank from 35 percent to 22 percent, and industry’s portion fell from 36 percent to 26 percent, while services expanded from 29 percent to 52 percent of GDP.
Within services, the share of telecommunications and information services increased tenfold, from 0.86 percent to 8.69 percent of GDP.
However, other key credit metrics are negatively affected.
Fiscal revenues relative to GDP for 2013 have decreased from an estimated 25 percent to 14 percent.
The rebasing also means foreign exchange reserves relative to GDP are now far smaller, compounding the credit-negative impact of the depletion of the Excess Crude Account (ECA) over the last 18 months due to below-budgeted oil production to the tune of 600,000 barrels per day, according to Moody’s.
that's still pretty good. could be better, of course. i personally think it's be better than that. and the population will not be as large as predictedConsidering it will be no.4 or even no.3 in population by then, ranking in the top 15 for economic size is not impressive at all. It will be less than 1/3 as rich as Japan is today (per person).
Please dont factor in the northern population of about 80 million, i dont think anyone expects anything to happen there at least not in the next 10 years.. any growth at all is mostly from the south..sad situationConsidering it will be no.4 or even no.3 in population by then, ranking in the top 15 for economic size is not impressive at all. It will be less than 1/3 as rich as Japan is today (per person).
Ah ok...so if we don't factor in half the country...and ekema says the population will not be as big as predicted...but the economy will be even better than predicted...and the muslim/christian thing is just a hiccup, and boko haram get bored and just stop...and Nigeria finds a way to earn foreign currency without oil, and the 100 million plus army of starving masses just keep putting up with it...and and andPlease dont factor in the northern population of about 80 million, i dont think anyone expects anything to happen there at least not in the next 10 years.. any growth at all is mostly from the south..sad situation
They seem to think growth rate will remain at 7 percent, however as most people i have talk to acknowledges the country has room for double digit growth that could at the very least last a decade, so i think the 4.5 trillion (which i don't think takes into account inflation) is bullshit. China went from a 309 billion dollar economy in 1984 to a 9 trillion dollar economy in just 30 years, yes Nigeria is not China (and i don't think anyone will approach the pace they set for development) however i don't see how Nigeria can only go from 510 billion dollar economy today to 4.5 trillion in 36 years. That just seems awfully pessimistic, at the very least Nigeria should be in the 6+ trillion mark by 2050 (with inflation maybe 8 or 9 trillion [pulling the inflation numbers out of my arse]). I see growth rate accelerating once power starts coming online, by 2020 there is no reason why Nigeria should not be growing at 8% or above annually.Considering it will be no.4 or even no.3 in population by then, ranking in the top 15 for economic size is not impressive at all. It will be less than 1/3 as rich as Japan is today (per person).
You're funny. He merely stated that the growth you see is mainly from the south. He didn't say don't factor in half the country. Where did you get that?. Where did you get all this BH stuff from. And what does non oil exports have to do with anything ? The 4.5tn is ppp anyway which is partly why I believe it's a low estimate.Ah ok...so if we don't factor in half the country...and ekema says the population will not be as big as predicted...but the economy will be even better than predicted...and the muslim/christian thing is just a hiccup, and boko haram get bored and just stop...and Nigeria finds a way to earn foreign currency without oil, and the 100 million plus army of starving masses just keep putting up with it...and and and
Cool stories, bro's :lol:
He...literally said don't factor in the north...that's where I got it from.You're funny. He merely stated that the growth you see is mainly from the south. He didn't say don't factor in half the country. Where did you get that?. Where did you get all this BH stuff from. And what does non oil exports have to do with anything ? The 4.5tn is ppp anyway which is partly why I believe it's a low estimate.
I happen to disagree with him. The north has contributed a lot in mining agriculture and even Nollywood
I agree. I don't know where digger found a slight against SA in the thread. But I agree those predictions that go into generations is too far ahead to be reliable. Egypt is not where it was predicted to be nor is indiaThis is gettinh tiresome. Nigeria vs SA thing
No way you can predict this, cant believe people get paid to write such rubbish. Nost African nations have a lot if bottlenecks which, once rectified, could lead to 10% growth. The economies are too immature to make predictions beyond a few years.
I detected no slight...I just said let us resume battle, as all this level headed talk is what I find to be tiresomeI agree. I don't know where digger found a slight against SA in the thread. But I agree those predictions that go into generations is too far ahead to be reliable. Egypt is not where it was predicted to be nor is india
Thats the key right there, Power, Power!! my aunt in vi-lagos, one of the most affluent neighbourhoods in lagos, pays 3000usd a month for diesel that doesn't even provide 24 hr coverage..Everyone knows that Nigeria has arguably the biggest bottleneck in the developing world. If the power ALONE is solved then you are guaranteed double digit growth. These stats suck.
a friend of my mother runs a chemical company and pays a ton of money, with no gaurantee of 24 hours. he says he would pay even more just to be guaranteed predictable power. it need not even be 24 hours, but if he can rely on a set amount of hours it would shoot up efficiency. power is the alpha and omega of any decent economyThats the key right there, Power, Power!! my aunt in vi-lagos, one of the most affluent neighbourhoods in lagos, pays 3000usd a month for diesel that doesn't even provide 24 hr coverage..
imagine how much of the country does the same? cutting this cost by 60% when power improves will free up spending money (this would make the country more attractive), collect more tax, ramp up infrastructure; and get to real planning.. Then we are in business, these little growth, fdi and gdp will be child's play..