SkyscraperCity Forum banner
1 - 20 of 49 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
National Express takes over GNER train operations
Filed 10/12/07



http://www.transportbriefing.co.uk/story.php?id=4579


New Look East Coast Trains with the New National Express Logo.

Britain's second largest transport company has taken over the operation of trains on one of the UK highest profile rail routes.

National Express East Coast succeeded GNER yesterday (9 December), gaining responsibility for running trains between London King's Cross and Aberdeen, Durham, Edinburgh, Leeds, Newcastle, Peterborough and York.

The new franchise, which is due to continue until 31 March 2015 with the last 17 months dependent on performance targets, will see National Express spend nearly £44m in an attempt to grow the business in order to pay £1.4bn back to the Department for Transport during the next eight years. The franchise is expected to generate total annual revenue of £600m in its first full year. Group chief executive Richard Bowker said: "We are privileged to be taking over inter-city East Coast, Britain's premier railway, which is known for the quality of its service by its many loyal customers. Our combined strengths of industry-leading operational performance, excellent customer service, innovation and sheer hard work give us confidence that we can make National Express East Coast a truly world class railway."

Immediate changes to the service will see WiFi internet access provided free in standard as well as first class carriages and a 100-day joint improvement plan, agreed with Network Rail, designed to significantly improve the punctuality of services. Within months of launch, on-board catering will feature a more contemporary range of dishes and snacks, complementing the option of restaurant dining, with hot food served at seat in standard class.

National Express plans innovations in ticketing and information to make it easier for customers to buy tickets and plan journeys more effectively. Proposals include real-time running information accessible by mobile phone; print at home tickets; a website which will enable total journey booking including parking and onward connection in a single visit, and smartcard ticketing. On Sunday (9 December) the GNER website, which has become familiar to customers during the past 11 years, was displaying an error message rather than forwarding visitors to the new National Express site.

From 2010, with the addition of five more trains to the East Coast fleet, there will be a further 25 services providing 14,000 extra seats each weekday. London-Leeds journeys will fall to two hours and London-York 1 hour 45 minutes, while the London-Edinburgh services journey time will be reduced to less than 4 hours 20 minutes on key services. At stations more than £10m will be spent to improve waiting rooms and information provision, increase CCTV cover, add more cycle spaces and increase car parking by 33%.

The company says it is aiming to make East Coast Britain's greenest railway. A predicted 17% reduction in fuel consumption will be targeted across the entire service and a number of stations will gain water conservation measures and wind turbines.

The business will be run by a management team based in York and led by managing director David Franks, who also retains his role as head of National Express Trains Division.

The launch of the new franchise marks the end of an era on the East Coast Main Line. GNER operated East Coast services since 1996 and became widely regarded as one of the most successful train operators created by Britain's newly-privatised rail industry. However, despite successfully winning a closely-fought new franchise term in 2005, financial problems at parent company Sea Containers and crippling subsidy payments forced it to hand back control of operations to the government, which has allowed it to run trains under a management contract until the handover to National Express.

National Express Group has also completed the purchase of Sea Containers Rail Services (SCRS) Ltd call centre at Newcastle. Under the terms of the deal more than 200 employees at the centre, in Baron House, and the assets will transfer to a new company, National Express Services Ltd, which will be a subsidiary of the National Express Group.






:)
 
G

·
It looks cheap and nasty, why couldn't they have just kept the classy dark blue livery and put their logo on it?

Would have saved them time and money.

I hope if BR is ever reborn they take the GNER livery, best colour scheme ever!
 

· Tax avoider
Joined
·
29,271 Posts
I saw a NEEC train pulling out of Wakefield Westgate yesterday - it was still in the dark blue and red livery, but with a white stripe with "national express east coast" obscuring the GNER logos...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
I saw a NEEC train pulling out of Wakefield Westgate yesterday - it was still in the dark blue and red livery, but with a white stripe with "national express east coast" obscuring the GNER logos...
That was just the quick fix removal of the GNER Red Stripe replacing it with a white NXEC logo. In the near future all the East Coast Trains will have the same liver (that pictured above).
 

· Registered
Joined
·
285 Posts
After a decade of running different rail companies under various names (some understandable like Midland Mainline and Anglia, others not so like C2C and 'one') the company has decided to brand all operations under the National Express brand. It's a strong, well-known (albeit) coach brand which they think can transfer well to rail. The logo for the whole group is new, the last one only lasted a few years, unlike the previous diagnonal stylised N and E which was pretty famous.

The CEO of NatEx recently made a good point that at Stansted Airport he has sales staff for NatEx coaches and sales staff for Stansted Express (run by NatEx trains) stood in neighbouring booths but unable to offer any information about the other. He wants to get rid of this separation, although considering that Stansted Express will retain its blue/orange livery when the rest of 'one' (which operates the Stansted Express) change to the new corporate livery, this might defeat the point.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 · (Edited)
GNER's livery was more classy.

Grand Centrals Livery -



I don't think NXEC's livery is that bad, it's just not as classy as GNER's. NXEC livery does look more modern, and the carriages have a similar livery to that
of National Express Coaches.



 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 · (Edited)
Its not a very exciting upgrade for the next 8 years though is it. New coloured stripes, wireless internet and 5 additional trains .... and this is supposed to be one of the most profitable routes
There is the prospect of a new generation of high-speed trains in 2012 - 2014 to replace the HST's

There are actually four new Driving Van Trailer or DVT's planned and Four Class 90's from EWS, this would increase capacity by over 15%.

It was never going to be exciting, it was a forced change of franchise due to problems with GNER's parent company sea containers.










:)
 

· Moderator
Joined
·
72,126 Posts
Its not a very exciting upgrade for the next 8 years though is it. New coloured stripes, wireless internet and 5 additional trains .... and this is supposed to be one of the most profitable routes
which is why they arent doing anything. if they did then theyd have no profits! what people dont realise is those of us using the ECML are actually paying a substantial amount of money to the govt in the ticket price - the govt makes money from commuters by the services running. there is no subsidisation of it, it is used purely as a revenue raiser for the govt. the sad thing is the line makes so much money the profits could have been reinvested and the upgrade would be paid for by now. the dept of transport will receive 1.4 billion quid from commuters over the period of the franchise! every time i take the train to london its nice to know im subsidising some fucker elsewhere because.... well just because. given the cost benefit of the ECML is greater than any other train line in the country surely it should be the other way around but then we'd have to build more capacity and oh yeah, those damn pesky profits would vanish again.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,540 Posts
which is why they arent doing anything. if they did then theyd have no profits! what people dont realise is those of us using the ECML are actually paying a substantial amount of money to the govt in the ticket price - the govt makes money from commuters by the services running. there is no subsidisation of it, it is used purely as a revenue raiser for the govt. the sad thing is the line makes so much money the profits could have been reinvested and the upgrade would be paid for by now. the dept of transport will receive 1.4 billion quid from commuters over the period of the franchise! every time i take the train to london its nice to know im subsidising some fucker elsewhere because.... well just because. given the cost benefit of the ECML is greater than any other train line in the country surely it should be the other way around but then we'd have to build more capacity and oh yeah, those damn pesky profits would vanish again.
Source?
 

· Moderator
Joined
·
72,126 Posts
they've promised a london to lincoln route some time in the next few years, so that is some good news for you goth.
source? try google. its been reported everywhere... NEG will make net payments to the govt £1.4 billion. cost benefits of the lines come from atkins and the house of commons public affairs committee. amusing report to read of them asking the network rail guy why the most profitable and successful line is neglected for the "black hole" of the wcml. its probably because the markets of edinburgh and leeds are much more valuable and important than the likes of birmingham and manchester, edinburgh in particular.

they've promised a london to lincoln route some time in the next few years, so that is some good news for you goth.
except the route theyve promised will be SLOWER than the current lincoln > newark > wait at newark > london! probably because the lines here are such utter shit. it is often quicker to cycle to other places in lincolnshire than take the train. the fastest trip will be 9 minutes slower than the current fastest one which requires a connection!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,912 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 · (Edited)
Here's a good recent article backing up gothicform's claims.

A train journey to London? It's cheaper to fly 4,000 miles away to Caribbean
ANDREW MCWHIRTER

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1921932007

UNIONS and passenger groups yesterday hit out at a new rail-franchise deal and highlighted the fact that it is cheaper to fly to the Caribbean than take a return trip by train between Scotland and London.

The National Express Group, which is today due to take over the running of the East Coast main line, has come under fire for the franchise contract which will see its fares rise by 2.1 per cent above the rate of inflation in each of the next eight years.

All of Scotland's rail operators have announced inflation-busting fare increases in recent months, but a standard open return train ticket from Edinburgh to London could cost £339 by 2015 under the new franchise, which will also see the familiar name of GNER replaced by National Express East Coast.

National Express took over the route from GNER, whose financial troubles meant it could not afford to pay the government £1.3 billion a year for the right to run the service.

The Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) union last night said it would resist any attempt to make its members "pay" for the National Express franchise deal with jobs, pay or conditions.

The general secretary, Bob Crow, said: "GNER's collapse under Sea Containers jeopardised jobs and services on one of our key spinal railways, but the government is refusing to learn the lesson that franchising won't deliver the railway we need.

"The environment is crying out for a rail network that is affordable and encourages people out of their cars and on to trains, but the new East Coast franchise will deliver the opposite.

"An open standard return to Inverness from King's Cross could already cost you £298, and you could fly out to Antigua for £2 less, even including fuel and passenger duty. Add eight years' worth of inflation-busting increases on to that, and the Caribbean will be even cheaper by comparison."

National Express last night said its passengers will see an improvement in services for the fare increase and highlighted that only 30 per cent of all tickets sold are open returns.

But James King, who represents Scotland on the board of official watchdog Passenger Focus, said passengers do not feel they are getting value for money from their train fares.

He said: "The National Express deal is one of many above-inflation fare increases that passengers will struggle to digest.

"Our last national survey showed that half of GNER passengers do not feel they get value for money and it will be interesting to see what people make of it next time round.

"For passengers who can afford to be flexible when they travel then there is still value to be had, but the majority of passengers will not be able to escape the above-inflation increases in fares."

The UK network has been Europe's fastest-growing railway over the past ten years, carrying nearly a billion passengers in that time. A new 2008 winter timetable that gets underway today will see a record 20,000 passenger services running on Britain's railways every weekday, according to the Association of Train Operating Companies.









:(
 
1 - 20 of 49 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top