SkyscraperCity Forum banner
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
If nothing else this pretty much guarantees the Raiders will sell out every game next season--bad team or not. 53,000 capacity and $25 season tickets...at least the place will looked packed for home games and create a better ambiance.
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
A lot of, if not most, necessary infrastructure is in the old part of the stadium, I believe--Press/radio/TV, locker rooms, training rooms, etc.. Even if you kept Mt Davis it would cost a lot to build a new opposite wing with all new stuff like that. Even the best reno plan won't come cheap--I'm guessing 75% of the cost of building from scratch. Doubtful that Davis finds that very palatable.
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
Another problem with a multi-use stadium is that, even if the shape and sight lines are decent, you're still going to have 30,000-40,000 empty seats for baseball. No MLB team is going to be happy with a stadium that's half empty or worse even on the best of nights.
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
Sapporo Dome:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q24--xddtM

For those of you discussing modern multi purpose stadium options.

Edit: 40,500 seats for baseball, 53,000 with temp seating for Soccer.


edit edit: its the home park of the Hokkaido Nippon Ham Fighters which just blows the "A's" out of the water....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapporo_Dome
I find it hard to believe that the Raiders or the NFL would approve a new stadium that wasn't expandable to at least 70,000 for Super Bowls.

Sapporo Dome is fine for what it is, but where are the 100+ luxury suites? Where are the 10,000 exclusive club seats? And the party decks?
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
After looking over the report, I am convinced more than ever that what Oakland needs is a modern multi-purpose stadium. I know all of the arguments against, but I can't imagine that there is any other way to keep both teams. They certainly won't be building two stadiums in Oakland. I'm not sure they can even manage one. With today's technology, I think it is possible to build one stadium to service both teams well.
The A's want a cozy venue that seats 32-35,000 fans max. I can't see them ever agreeing to play in a 60,000 seat stadium, even if it is "state-of-the-art".

Before that happens they'll move to a market more condusive to selling out a smaller venue--Portland, Montreal, Charlotte, Indianapolis...the clock is ticking on Oakland, although if the Raiders move to LA (about 50/50 chance if not better at this point), the A's will be in a better position to get their 35,000 seat ballpark in Oakland.
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
:lol: Well don't knock the Kiss until you've tried it.

For sure, I think the NFL would be nuts to reject the Rams, who had 2/3 of the popular vote. But I agree that the Raiders, who had over 30 percent and carry their own fans with them, are the second choice. I can easily see fans coming from the Bay Area, LV and SD to see them in Carson, or Inglewood for that matter.

But, as before, the difference maker is that neither Oakland or SD have shown any interest in contributing any money, and in such case, LA or even San Antonio could be a better choice.
What I don't get is why not simply play in Hollypark with the Rams? What chance do the Raiders or Chargers have building this Carson project if they're the sole tenant? Cause no way all three teams move to LA...do they?
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
Shot of the Coliseum from many, many moons ago. There is no way on Earth to figure out the exact date. The fair sized crowd and the empty advertising spot on the scoreboard are almost contradictory, but I think that this was when the team was bouncing back from the Charlie Finley days, maybe in 1980. And I believe that the player in the shot is Tony Armas. Tweeted by MLBcathedrals.

Edit: scratch that. Found some more pix, this was camera day in 1974. Still can't figure out why Finley could not sell advertising on the scoreboard.

Actually it was "cap day" 1974. I saw a shot of the LF scoreboard just now and there's no ad on it either. https://twitter.com/MLBcathedrals
Weird.
 

· Namasté
Joined
·
1,023 Posts
I wonder how that will work when football season arrives? While that area of the stadium is beyond the left field wall for baseball, those are pretty decent sideline corner seats for football. I'm curious how they will handle the transition.
Yeah standing areas can't be beloved in football right?
They'll probably just leave it as a standing area/party deck. Lots of NFL teams have those.
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Top