I can't help thinking that too much emphasis is being put on the quality of paving and roads here.......you have to ask the question - how much does it really matter? Of course, it matters a great deal to a load of aesthetes, planners and SSC contributors, but in the general scheme of things, Manchester's surfaces ain't that bad.
Take Piccadilly for an example. Yesterday afternoon it was full of life and buzzing with the market, hoards of people and buskers, fountains working as planned and a lot more people sitting down and using the space that you ever saw in the old sunken gardens. It's become a real usable space and the quality of the road and pedestrian areas are fine, considering the constant hammering they're getting.
Compare and contrast with Leicester Sq. Now that it a disgusting rank public space.
Houston. I've always been under the impression that there are practically no pedestrians in downtown Houston or Dallas, partly because of the humidity and also because walking isn't the done thing in much of the US.
Take Piccadilly for an example. Yesterday afternoon it was full of life and buzzing with the market, hoards of people and buskers, fountains working as planned and a lot more people sitting down and using the space that you ever saw in the old sunken gardens. It's become a real usable space and the quality of the road and pedestrian areas are fine, considering the constant hammering they're getting.
Compare and contrast with Leicester Sq. Now that it a disgusting rank public space.
Houston. I've always been under the impression that there are practically no pedestrians in downtown Houston or Dallas, partly because of the humidity and also because walking isn't the done thing in much of the US.