SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Population Growth, Urban Sprawl, and New Sinage Laws!

4567 Views 45 Replies 18 Participants Last post by  Malt
i have a few news stories to post. Decided ot chuck them all in 1 thread insteadl of making 4.


Sunshine state tops population growth
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1330709.htm

Sunshine state tops population growth
Queensland's south-east has recorded the highest population growth in the country during 2003-2004.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Brisbane and the Gold Coast grew by 17,600 and 13,200 respectively over the period.

Brisbane and the surrounding Moreton region together increased by almost 62,000 people, or around 1,200 per week.

The increase is ahead of Melbourne which increased by about 860 people per week, Sydney's 640 people per week and Perth's 500 people per week.

The outer suburbs appear to be the areas of highest growth in the capitals.

In Melbourne's outer south-east, Casey increased by 8,700 people and Wyndham in the south-west by 8,400 people, while in Sydney's north-west, Blacktown increased by 5,500 people and Baulkham Hills by 3,500 people.

The largest population increase in Western Australia occurred in Wanneroo in Perth's north with 6,700 people.

In the inner cities, Perth recorded the highest rate of growth of 12.1 per cent or 1,100 people, although Sydney had the biggest increase of 5,100 people ahead of Melbourne's 3,700.

Australia's migration to coastal areas continued with the Tweed and Hastings regions in northern NSW increasing by 1,700 and 1,300 people respectively, while in far north Queensland Cairns increased by 2,800 people and Hervey Bay in the south-east increased by 2,600 people.

Mandurah south of Perth increased by 4,300 people.

Away from the coast, inland regional centres such as Maitland in the Hunter Valley, Albury-Wodonga on the New South Wales/Victorian border, Bendigo and Ballarat in central Victoria, and Toowoomba on Queensland's Darling Downs all continued to gain population.


Population growth poses urban sprawl challenge
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1330860.htm

Population growth poses urban sprawl challenge
By Ben Knight

New figures on population growth in Australian cities are putting pressure on governments to manage urban sprawl.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics' latest data show that the rate of new arrivals in Sydney has halved since the Olympic year of 2000, and that Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth have firmed as the nation's fastest-growing cities.

Demographer Bernard Salt, a partner with KPMG and the author of The Big Shift, has documented the so-called 'sea change' phenomenon.

"Every 10,000 people that move to a city take with them $80 million in new retail spending," Mr Salt said. "That will create demand for around 3,000-4,000 new households or houses.

"Population growth generates wealth. It also contributes in some way to urban sprawl but that really is up to the city to manage that growth.

"It's a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is economic growth; on the other hand, there is the necessity to manage the sprawl."

Playing catch-up

One of the complaints of newcomers to a city is that the area they are moving into does not seem to be ready for them in terms of public transport and the like.

Mr Salt says there has been an issue with the provision of services and infrastructure in Australian cities for 50 or 60 years.

"It is a common feature for people to move to outer suburbia and have to wait for infrastructure services to arrive in that area," he said.

"We're simply not rich enough as a nation to put all of the infrastructure in place and to then wait for the population to arrive.

"Unfortunately, the practicality is that it works the other way around: people move to the outer suburbs and then infrastructure follows.

"The issue is how long it takes for the infrastructure to actually arrive to service that community.

Predominantly suburban

He says Australians are predominantly a suburban people.

"We like outer-suburbia," Mr Salt said. "There is a small group, a renegade group, that is pushing back downtown. The vast majority still prefer the burbs."

Mr Salt says much of the growth in outer-suburbia is actually the transfer of population from the middle-distance suburbs and the inner suburbs to the outer-most edge of capital cities.

"There is certainly an in-flow of overseas migrants but they tend to focus in the inner suburbs," he said.

"So suburban growth on the edge of our larger cities is really driven in large part by internal transfer of Australians simply moving to bigger, better premises on the edge of the city."



Brisbane to undergo changes to signage laws

http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,12641669%5E3102,00.html

Brisbane to undergo changes to signage laws
Chris Griffith, City Hall reporter
24mar05
BRISBANE is about to undergo a signage revolution with giant electronic graphic display screens like those in Times Square in New York and Piccadilly Circus in London on the horizon.



But the screens, which would play videos and broadcast live television and animated films, are just the tip of the iceberg in the changes to signage law which reverse the more conservative stand of former lord mayor Jim Soorley.

Giant banners mounted on the scaffolding of construction sites, temporary inflatable signs on fixed balloons, blimps, and kites, signs on transport infrastructure such as overbridges, abutments, and piers, and mobile signs on trucks parked at the roadside will be permitted in new local law passed at this week's council meeting in Brisbane.

The law also will allow advertising on footpath dining furniture such as umbrellas and windbreaks but only if the signs display the name of the business or the brand of a product sold on the premises.









And exactly what can be advertised?

Cigarettes among many other things it seems, according to both Lord Mayor Campbell Newman and Deputy Mayor David Hinchliffe who agreed that the council had no power to stop it.

The categories of signs permitted without a licence have been increased from 16 to 28, the types of signs requiring licences reduced from 31 to 21, and the types of prohibited signs reduced from 12 to seven.

The changes require State Government ratification and will be subject to extensive public consultation before coming into effect, possibly on July 1.

One of the interesting changes involves mobile motor vehicle signs.

A cinderella industry has sprung up of small trucks crisscrossing Brisbane with advertising billboards on their rear and sides.

They were allowed under state law as long as they kept moving on the roads; if they parked they fell under council law that banned their billboards.

These small trucks will soon drive and park at will.

Cr Newman said the new signage law was the delivery of an election promise to relax signage and give business a better chance to promote itself.

His original policy centred on increasing the number of permissible sandwich boards outside a shop from one to two – to benefit "businesses run by mums and dads" such as coffee shops, restaurants, and tyre shops.

But he did not want the extra sandwich boards outside shops to impede the disabled or elderly. He said licensing relaxations would see council income drop 51 per cent.

"I've had lots of complaints that council has been heavy-handed in the past," Cr Newman said.

However, Cr Newman said he was not wedded to the changes and the council would act on public opinion.

Cr Hinchliffe said Labor had voted for the changes in line with its promise not to frustrate Cr Newman's election promises. But he had serious reservations about some proposals.

"If we double the number of A-frames outside shops it will be a case of hop, skip, and jump through shopping centres," Cr Hinchliffe said.

He was worried trucks with billboards that roamed in convoy around Brisbane would park in convoy. "And my image of a modern city is not one of inflatable gorillas bobbing around the skyline," he said. "You only have to look at other parts of southeast Queensland to see signage out of control, such as on the Gold Coast.

South-east Qld undergoes population explosion
http://www.abc.net.au/news/items/200503/1330954.htm?sunshine

Australia's population is on the move and the Australian Bureau of Statistics says most of them are moving to Queensland's south-east corner.

The region recorded the highest population growth in the nation during 2003-2004.

While Brisbane's population grew by almost 18,000 and the Gold Coast's by 13,000, the Sunshine Coast welcomed just under 7,000 new residents - an increase of 3.4 per cent.

Bureau spokesman Matthew Montgomery says it appears the population changes appear to be dictated by the economy, need and the desire for a sea change lifestyle.

"That's definitely one trend that's continuing, but at the same time there's large increases of people moving to outer suburban areas at the same time...what we're seeing is people moving back into inner-city areas and so there's a number of different population moves going on at the moment," he said.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
Seems that the ABS is contradicting itself, or something. Already posted in the Victorian forums, from the Melbourne AGE: :)

[Edit: I'm aware that Brisbane has the highest % increase, but still...the numbers baby, the numbers!]
________________________________________________________________
Melbourne's population booms
By Melissa Marino, Tim Colebatch
March 24, 2005





It's not exactly a challenge to Sydney's number one city title - not yet, anyway - but it is a trend. For the third year running, Melbourne has significantly outgrown the harbour city, recording the highest population increase of any capital in Australia.

After decades of watching its power and population share drift northwards, Melbourne in the last financial year grew by a healthy 1.3 per cent, adding almost 45,000 people to more than 3.6 million.

In percentage terms, Melbourne's growth almost doubled that of Sydney, which lagged behind the national average with a modest 0.8 per cent rise, according to the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures.

Despite the Bracks Government's controversial 2030 policy push for consolidation in existing developed areas, much of Melbourne's population increase continues to occur in outer suburban areas including Casey, Wyndham and Melton.

While Melbourne added the most people in 2003-04, Brisbane continued to be the fastest-growing city in percentage terms, adding 39,700 people, or 2.3 per cent.

It is the third year in a row that Sydney has trailed the population growth of both Melbourne and Brisbane. Melbourne led the way in 2001-02 with a population increase of 41,426, followed by Brisbane and Sydney.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

In Victoria, the City of Casey recorded the highest population growth of any local government area in 2003-04, with 8700 new residents.

Mayor Neil Lucas said news that the area had topped the list was "very passe out here". Casey, he said, had led population growth for several years.

Mr Lucas said the growth in the municipality was being driven by the "juggernaut" of young people wanting to own their own homes on their own block of land.

The figures coincide with renewed debate this week over the merits of 2030, the State Government's planning blueprint that was criticised by planning experts Bob Birrell and Kevin O'Connor as being too focused on high-density living around activity centres in urban areas.

Mr Birrell said the figures showed that unlike Sydney, Melbourne still had a strong demand for frontier land. That demand, he said, did not come just from new home owners, but from older generations wanting to upgrade from outer suburbs to estates with features such as lakes and gates. "In Melbourne about two-thirds of all dwellings are still new detached dwellings whereas in Sydney it's more like a third," he said.

A State Government spokesman said growth in Casey, as well as Wyndham in the west and Melton in the north, was expected because they were three of the five growth corridors identified under 2030.

"This should not be a surprise that we're seeing growth picking up in these areas and we will continue to make sure land is available but in a planned way," he said.

The spokesman said the 2030 plan was needed to stop "this Los Angeles-style" of growth and to ensure planning was effective, that services and transport were available and that "precious open space," known in the blueprint as green wedges were maintained.

The bureau figures show that since 2001, Melbourne has added almost 25,000 more people to its population than Sydney. Over the three years its population has grown by 128,455 or 3.7 per cent, while Sydney's has grown by 103,806 or 2.5 per cent.

The population rates reflect other trends that show NSW trailing on key economic indicators. In three years to June 2004, gross domestic product (GDP) grew in NSW by 7.6 per cent, compared with 19.1 per cent in WA, 17.5 per cent in Queensland, 11.2 per cent in Victoria, 10.3 per cent in Tasmania and 9.3 per cent in SA.
See less See more
^
The 3 year statement simply isn't correct - Brisbane grew by 2370 more 02-03. I sent an email pointing this out earlier today....
Bca said:
Seems that the ABS is contradicting itself, or something. Already posted in the Victorian forums, from the Melbourne AGE: :)

[Edit: I'm aware that Brisbane has the highest % increase, but still...the numbers baby, the numbers!]
________________________________________________________________
Melbourne's population booms
By Melissa Marino, Tim Colebatch
March 24, 2005





It's not exactly a challenge to Sydney's number one city title - not yet, anyway - but it is a trend. For the third year running, Melbourne has significantly outgrown the harbour city, recording the highest population increase of any capital in Australia.

After decades of watching its power and population share drift northwards, Melbourne in the last financial year grew by a healthy 1.3 per cent, adding almost 45,000 people to more than 3.6 million.

In percentage terms, Melbourne's growth almost doubled that of Sydney, which lagged behind the national average with a modest 0.8 per cent rise, according to the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures.

Despite the Bracks Government's controversial 2030 policy push for consolidation in existing developed areas, much of Melbourne's population increase continues to occur in outer suburban areas including Casey, Wyndham and Melton.

While Melbourne added the most people in 2003-04, Brisbane continued to be the fastest-growing city in percentage terms, adding 39,700 people, or 2.3 per cent.

It is the third year in a row that Sydney has trailed the population growth of both Melbourne and Brisbane. Melbourne led the way in 2001-02 with a population increase of 41,426, followed by Brisbane and Sydney.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

In Victoria, the City of Casey recorded the highest population growth of any local government area in 2003-04, with 8700 new residents.

Mayor Neil Lucas said news that the area had topped the list was "very passe out here". Casey, he said, had led population growth for several years.

Mr Lucas said the growth in the municipality was being driven by the "juggernaut" of young people wanting to own their own homes on their own block of land.

The figures coincide with renewed debate this week over the merits of 2030, the State Government's planning blueprint that was criticised by planning experts Bob Birrell and Kevin O'Connor as being too focused on high-density living around activity centres in urban areas.

Mr Birrell said the figures showed that unlike Sydney, Melbourne still had a strong demand for frontier land. That demand, he said, did not come just from new home owners, but from older generations wanting to upgrade from outer suburbs to estates with features such as lakes and gates. "In Melbourne about two-thirds of all dwellings are still new detached dwellings whereas in Sydney it's more like a third," he said.

A State Government spokesman said growth in Casey, as well as Wyndham in the west and Melton in the north, was expected because they were three of the five growth corridors identified under 2030.

"This should not be a surprise that we're seeing growth picking up in these areas and we will continue to make sure land is available but in a planned way," he said.

The spokesman said the 2030 plan was needed to stop "this Los Angeles-style" of growth and to ensure planning was effective, that services and transport were available and that "precious open space," known in the blueprint as green wedges were maintained.

The bureau figures show that since 2001, Melbourne has added almost 25,000 more people to its population than Sydney. Over the three years its population has grown by 128,455 or 3.7 per cent, while Sydney's has grown by 103,806 or 2.5 per cent.

The population rates reflect other trends that show NSW trailing on key economic indicators. In three years to June 2004, gross domestic product (GDP) grew in NSW by 7.6 per cent, compared with 19.1 per cent in WA, 17.5 per cent in Queensland, 11.2 per cent in Victoria, 10.3 per cent in Tasmania and 9.3 per cent in SA.
If the top three cities maintained there same relative % increases (i.e 0.8%, 1.3% and 2.3%) then Melbourne would become the biggest city in 34 years, Sydney would drop to number 3 in 60 years and Brisbane would become numero uno after 74 years with a population of 9.4 million. :) Do the maths.

oh, btw. I don't think it will happen. :)
See less See more
RUM said:
If the top three cities maintained there same relative % increases (i.e 0.8%, 1.3% and 2.3%) then Melbourne would become the biggest city in 34 years, Sydney would drop to number 3 in 60 years and Brisbane would become numero uno after 74 years with a population of 9.4 million. :) Do the maths.

oh, btw. I don't think it will happen. :)
To squeeze to lemon, these figures are EXPECTED to fall. No country can maintain that amount growth over 50 to 75 years, unless we increase immigration levels. Our birth rate is falling under the replacement rate of 2.0.So I dont know how we can even get Brisbane up to 4 million, in the next 100 years, if our immigration policy remains the same.
See less See more
Ofero Melbourne has grown faster than Sydney for the past 3 years so it is correct, Brisbane wasnt mentioned.
^
True, but because of the comma it implies that it had the highest growth of any capitals over the 3 year period.

"For the third year running, Melbourne has significantly outgrown the harbour city, recording the highest population increase of any capital in Australia."
Q-TIP said:
To squeeze to lemon, these figures are EXPECTED to fall. No country can maintain that amount growth over 50 to 75 years, unless we increase immigration levels. Our birth rate is falling under the replacement rate of 2.0.So I dont know how we can even get Brisbane up to 4 million, in the next 100 years, if our immigration policy remains the same.
Yes, I realise that. That's why I said I wouldn't expect it to happen. I was just trying to prove a point.
See less See more
>>>>"19.1 per cent in WA"<<<<

Get the hint
Citystyle said:
>>>>"19.1 per cent in WA"<<<<

Get the hint
Ok...well this is Queensland forums, where we discuss issues relating to the state of Queensland...troll.
So what has Metro SEQ grown by - I'm sure its the fastest Metro growth area in Australia by far, even if you include just Brisbane and GC it would be at least 60,000 per year - thats way more than any other capital:D :D :D

Love living in SEQ!!

jt
JayT said:
So what has Metro SEQ grown by - I'm sure its the fastest Metro growth area in Australia by far, even if you include just Brisbane and GC it would be at least 60,000 per year - thats way more than any other capital:D :D :D

Love living in SEQ!!

jt
Apparently Brisbane alone is growing at 1000 per week, and we took almost half the migration tide with 36, 700.

In All, SEQ grew by 81,000.
See less See more
^
Qld grew by 81,000. SEQ grew by 61,868 (or thereabouts) But I have a feeling that these peliminary stats will change....probably up - they have for the last 3 years.
Citystyle said:
>>>>"19.1 per cent in WA"<<<<

Get the hint
Meh.......
The new signage laws are rather disturbing. Don't we have enough mindless commercialism without adding giant billboards into the equation?
I tend to agree with you ABS... (disclaimer: I have not read the whole changes to the signage laws)
i tend to disagree.

Give me plasma screens plz.

lol who doesnt get Wow'd by even pics of Time Square?
And alot of youve probably seen it.

We cant beat that but we can try :D
See less See more
Im a bit hesitant about it all, while I dont necessarily mind the idea of more advertising in the form of billboards and plasma displays and all that, it does concern me that there seems to be alot less regulations but it is inevitable so we will just have to wait and see what happens.
I'm all for it. Big screens around the city, lots of lights... It'll be great! :D
^
ditto to marty and malt. I think it could be great for the city.
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top