SkyscraperCity Forum banner

PROJECT: Melbourne Convention Centre

59500 Views 502 Replies 91 Participants Last post by  CP Doom
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/18/1082226636118.html

New convention centre, bridge for city's west
By Royce Millar
City Reporter
April 19, 2004


A new footbridge over the Yarra linking Southbank and Docklands will be part of a $330 million convention precinct the State Government is expected to announce in its April statement tomorrow.

The precinct's centrepiece will be a 5000-seat convention centre, or plenary hall, earmarked for the former Mazda site next to the Exhibition Centre, widely known as Jeff's Shed.

Business groups have lobbied for years for a new convention venue, arguing that Melbourne's existing 1500-seat centre is hopelessly outdated.

The State Government has been tight-lipped about details of the April statement and has refused to confirm whether the convention centre project would be included.

Government sources said they expected the project to be a public-private partnership, with a private group building the centre and leasing it to the government.

The managers of the existing exhibition centre - a government-appointed trust - are likely to run the new centre.

But the project will hinge on support from the Melbourne City Council, which will be under intense pressure tomorrow to contribute $43 million, including about $15 million for the bridge.

Yesterday's Government announcement that it would return control of Docklands to the council was clearly timed to encourage the council to support the convention centre.

Yesterday a town hall source said the council had demanded it get Docklands back in return for a contribution to the convention centre.

A private town hall briefing today will be the first formal council discussion on the project. A special council meeting to vote on the contribution has been hastily called for tomorrow to coincide with the April statement.

Lord Mayor John So strongly supports the new centre. He will have the numbers to approve a council contribution.

But the council is split, with as many as four of the nine councillors possibly opposed to council involvement.

Finance committee chairman and former Labor Party member Kevin Chamberlin said yesterday the council administration had confirmed that a large contribution would result in service cuts, a rate rise, or both.

If the convention centre was to be a public-private partnership the council should not contribute, he said.

The Committee for Melbourne called on the council to back the project.

"People come to these conventions with millions of disposable dollars and this has a remarkable knock-on effect for business in the city," executive director Janine Kirk said.

State MPs and councillors have questioned whether Melbourne needs a new centre, when existing venues such as the Docklands football stadium can seat 5000.

But the chief executive of the existing Melbourne Exhibition and Convention Centre, Leigh Harry, said that to compete for international conventions, Melbourne needed a centre with a large plenary hall, a large exhibition space, and plenty of smaller meeting rooms.

He said no existing Melbourne venue provided all three.

Mr Harry said among world cities Melbourne had slipped from fourth to 25th in the number of international conventions hosted.

He said that Melbourne's lack of convention capacity made it ineligible for 320 major international conventions.
See less See more
Status
Not open for further replies.
81 - 100 of 503 Posts
The original DCM building (Jeff's Shed) has its strength in its sweeping, standalone design. As you drive on the West Gate, you can see the "cross section" where the "wing" ends. To attach something to it would be a mistake IMHO. That's the problem with the DCM extension proposal - it compromises the integrity of the original structure. I'd prefer underground access to a new, complementary MECC. Perhaps another low rise "blade"-like structure sweeping along the Yarra?
See less See more
Press release today:

Mr Brumby said the development of convention centre had moved a step closer with proposals being received at the end of this week from the three short listed bidders- Convene, Melbourne Convention Centre Partnership and Multiplex/Plenary Consortium.

"Bidders are encouraged to developed innovative, competitive bids and adopt best practices ecological sustainable development principles," he said.

A decision on the successful consortium will be made by the end of this year.
See less See more
OSJ said:
^^^ These kind of projects should always be done as international design competitions, at least in the first round. Whilst I understand they are trying to avoid the cost blowouts of fed square type experimental projects, there is no reason that proper buildability and economic assessments couldn't be a part of the later stages of an open competition.

I don't know what these designs will be like, and they be amazing, but Melbourne has IMO missed alot of opportunities in the last few years to really put itself on the map design wise. The examples I give are -

MCG - big, yes but compare this to the allianz arena or the beijing olympic stadium

Vodaphone - technically sufficient - architecturally awful.

Telstra - didn't even get the technical right - the minute I saw the design, I knew they'd have trouble with shadows and TV, and the grass not growing. The exterior looks like a factory.

CG Village - what an opportunity for urban design, sustainability etc.

Albert Park pool - ho hum suburban sports centre.

Fed Square proves that controversial architecture can be embraced publicly, and the MEC proves that design can be beautiful and technically/economically successful at the same time.
I totally agree OSJ,

but - as the press about this and other issues in the AGE a couple of months ago suggests:

The attitude to procurement of major projects rests with the government of the time. The sad reality is the Bracks labour government has a less than enlightened view on these projects (from an aesthetic view or any other view apart from the bottom line). That is being corrected slightly with the apointment of a State Gov Architect later this year.....

but still, the goverments attitude to this is they consider a project like the convention centre as "infrastructure", not "architecture"...which says it all really

I have also argued about the merits of a two stage process, and there is a lot of rational behind that. However, the attitude in Government is about getting the "best value" outcome, not the "best design" outcome....

The other side of coin is the benefits of the "experience economy" - Bilbao effect etc, which tourism benefits far offset the cost of a little $200-300M building. Again, a diiferent government would see it differently.

of course, this would be a different project under a "Kennet style" government

and anyway, I would wait to see the result before making any judgements about design quality! does'nt mean it's going to be crap!
See less See more
^ Yeah true we don't the result. It could be like Spencer street, which has been a fantastic outcome design wise.

Another thing is that whilst this process doesn't push design as strongly as an open competition, it seems to push it moreso than other tender processes, as it seems to be a factor in the selection process. I may be wrong, but I believe the tender process for buildings like Vodaphone or the Albert Park complex involved no concept designs during the tender process. The architects were assessed based on previous projects and abilities. Correct me if its otherwise.
See less See more
Bump.... The bids have been submitted for a while now....anyone know of any renders out there?
Read somthing yesterday in the age, said that Multiplex and Lend Lease were the two main contenders, reckon they will win, one of those two.
Interesting to see demolition has started on the old mazda site.

See less See more
It will be interesting to see the proposals when they do get realised. Just hope they arent boring like the World Trade Centre/Convention Centre. I have a feeling the Government will go cheap on this project after such fiasco's as the Spencer Street Station (will the contractors want to get involved in complex designs when dealing with Vic Governmenbt again?)
See less See more
MelbEuropa said:
It will be interesting to see the proposals when they do get realised. Just hope they arent boring like the World Trade Centre/Convention Centre. I have a feeling the Government will go cheap on this project after such fiasco's as the Spencer Street Station (will the contractors want to get involved in complex designs when dealing with Vic Governmenbt again?)
I wouldn't call it a fiasco on State Govt's behalf... there's always a risk of this happening with compulsory competetive tendering... contractors often stuff up the costings in pursuit of trying to get the cheapest/ most competetive price. Plus given the context the costings should be easier for this site, i.e. there aren't rail lines or any continuing use during construction.
See less See more
AFR
New line-ups bid for Docklands
Mathew Dunckley
10 November 2005

Consortia led by Lend Lease and Multiplex will go head to head as preferred bidders for the $350 million Melbourne Convention Centre project, the Victorian government announced yesterday.

The announcement followed a late rejigging of the unsuccessful Melbourne Convention Centre Partnership (MCCP) bid, which was backed by Macquarie Bank.

The Lend Lease consortium, Convene, includes services provider Spotless and ABN Amro, while Multiplex is teamed with the Plenary Group.

They are competing to build and manage the 5000-seat centre at Southbank through a public-private partnership agreement estimated to be worth about $350 million.

The contract includes a 20-year deal to run the existing exhibition centre, known locally as Jeff's Shed after former premier Jeff Kennett.

It will also require the design and construction of a pedestrian bridge, linking the north side of the Yarra and the Docklands.

Earlier this year Baulderstone Hornibrook and German parent Bilfinger Berger quietly withdrew from the MCCP bid.

Macquarie Bank then stepped up to take over leadership of the bid bringing in Leighton Holdings - which is also the contractor on the embattled Spencer Street Station PPP project - but no announcement was made at the time by the government or the parties involved.

Last year, Leighton's boss Wal King savaged the state government's approach to PPPs, describing it as a "master-slave relationship".

None of the parties were willing to comment when contacted by The Australian Financial Review.

The process has been a long one and the convention centre is already more than a year behind schedule. It is now expected to be completed late in 2008 and delivered in 2009.

Mr Lenders said the changes in the consortia took place in April after a "legal and probity evaluation".

Macquarie Bank had always been a member of the MCCP consortium, he said.

"Today's announcement is a significant step in the construction of Australia's largest convention and exhibition precinct," Mr Lenders said.

"The evaluation process, including an assessment of what bid offered the best value for Victorian taxpayers, found these two bids came closest to addressing our requirements."

Mr Lenders said negotiations with the remaining consortia would now start to clarify construction, design, services and commercial details of each bid.

A decision on the successful contractor would be made early next year with construction expected to begin after the Commonwealth Games in March, he said.

The government estimates the centre will contribute an additional $197 million annually to Victoria's economy and create 2500 new jobs each year over 25 years.

____________________

who wants to start haggling Daryl Jackson for renders? :happy:
See less See more
Hope there's a tower or two attatched to the site as per conceptual renders.
Lend Lease and Multiplex, how predictable was that :)
Go for the Ritzy Flower Drum !

Convention centre plan up in the air
Email Print Normal font Large font By Royce Millar
January 31, 2006 :)

Advertisement
AdvertisementA $1.1 BILLION "mini-city" including a five-star hotel, offices, apartments and shops is one of two "chalk and cheese" schemes before the State Government, which is struggling with a decision on its next major project — the convention centre at Southbank.

Well-placed sources say the Government is finding it hard to choose between two vastly different bids for the 5000-seat centre. Sources close to the bidding say the Government, which has committed $370 million to the project, is nervous after problems with the Spencer Street Station revamp and other public-private partnerships.

The alternative bid is a $500 million to $600 million bare-bones scheme that includes the centre and a hotel. It was so modest, said one source, that the Government asked the proponents, including Melbourne architect Daryl Jackson, to submit a more "ritzy" and "landmark" design.

Sources have confirmed confidential details by the two remaining consortiums:

■Builder Multiplex and financier Plenary Group bid: Goes well beyond the Government's brief and features five large buildings including the convention centre, a $100 million Hilton Hotel, two state-of-the-art German-style retail centres and an office-and-apartment tower.

■Builder Bovis Lend Lease and finance group Babcock & Brown: A more minimal approach that sticks to the Government brief and focuses on the convention centre itself and associated hotel.

A source close to the Multiplex project has likened the Government's choice to a contest between the Flower Drum restaurant and McDonald's. Another source close to the Lend Lease team warned of the "smoke and mirrors" in the Opposition's "Disneyland" scheme.

Bureaucrats are believed to be undecided about the two approaches, referring the project to cabinet ministers.

Major Projects Minister John Lenders is believed to favour the simpler option while Tourism Minister John Pandazopoulos apparently sees the bigger project as a potential international drawcard and money spinner. A decision was due late last year and is now expected next month.

While not backing a particular bid, the Victorian Employers Chamber of Commerce and Industry yesterday called for a bold decision.

Chamber president Richard Holyman said all big Australian and Asian cities had convention facilities and Melbourne needed a spectacular centre to set it apart. But he cautioned against elaborate frills and infrastructure that might not be realistic in the current property market.

Opposition major projects spokeswoman Louise Asher last night said the Kennett government had planned to start building the centre in 2000. The Bracks Government is aiming for a 2009 opening date.

She said the Government's failure to get the centre built was damaging the economy, because Melbourne was falling behind as a convention destination.

Mr Lenders' spokeswoman, Manika Naidoo, said the tender was not yet finalised and so no comment could be made. A decision would be made soon.
See less See more
Marky Mark said:
It was so modest, said one source, that the Government asked the proponents, including Melbourne architect Daryl Jackson, to submit a more "ritzy" and "landmark" design.
How depressing.

I hope the other one is better and the government has some balls on this one.
See less See more
Hope Multiplex wins. By the sound of things their's is by far the best solution as all that activity will liven up that part of the city. During the day going from the Exhibition centre to Yarra's Edge on foot it's pretty dead apart from the occasional reception every now and then and the few people that frequent that ghastly Maritime Museum. It'll also mean more cranes and shut some of the naysayers up.
See less See more
Hrrm. Next thing we know, an undecided Bracks government will launch a $50million study into which option is best. When the study gets bogged down after 5 years of deliberation (or it doesn't give the answers that the Labor government of the day wants) a $25million enquiry will be launched into the study. The findings, of course, will be inconclusive, apart from that no-vision government doesn't know what the bloody hell to do other than aim for the next election. When the centre does get finally built in 2054 it might be good for cockroach racing on Australia Day, but because the big conventions have long gone to Sydney, Brisbane and the now-thriving metropolis of Oodnadatta, there won't be anyone to convene in it.
Thanks Steve, you make me want to be a worser man.

Blue
See less See more
Whats with all the Bracks Labor bashing? the bloody project hasnt been decided on as yet and the usual whingers are at it.

Have a look at the new theatre and recital hall to be built at Southbank and tell me that is "stodgy". Bracks and co might just surprise you with this one as well.
Marky Mark said:
Major Projects Minister John Lenders is believed to favour the simpler option while Tourism Minister John Pandazopoulos apparently sees the bigger project as a potential international drawcard and money spinner.
Lenders = myopic numbskull

Panda = CHAMP.

case closed
See less See more
auslankan said:
Whats with all the Bracks Labor bashing? the bloody project hasnt been decided on as yet and the usual whingers are at it.

Have a look at the new theatre and recital hall to be built at Southbank and tell me that is "stodgy". Bracks and co might just surprise you with this one as well.
As I said in an earlier post - and not a particular swipe at this government, but buildings of this importance should be open to an international design competition - if the competition has enough safety factors in terms of buildability, cost etc, then a bank and a builder will pick the project up.

So it should be staged - first: open design comp with a shortlist created. Second: consortium comp where the best overall package is chosen.

As you can see with Spencer street, even when a reputable consortium/designer does get chosen, sh!t can still hit the fan cost wise.
See less See more
81 - 100 of 503 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top