SkyscraperCity banner

5841 - 5848 of 5848 Posts

·
Perpetual Bohemian
Joined
·
3,523 Posts
The metro could also have run via Wentworth Point and Ermington but that would probably kill the 20 minute journey objective - though how important is that compared to if it became, say, 25 minutes? Anyway, once it's decided that the metro is to stay south of the river, that increases the chance of the light rail branch being confirmed. Perhaps that should be routed through Wentworth Point?
 

·
...........
Joined
·
21,552 Posts
I feel that one of the reasons the 20min is important is the need to allow for interchange at the city end increasing the trip time, as well as needing it to be sufficiently faster to encourage people to take the metro over the CityRail to relieve congestion.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,780 Posts
The metro could also have run via Wentworth Point and Ermington but that would probably kill the 20 minute journey objective - though how important is that compared to if it became, say, 25 minutes? Anyway, once it's decided that the metro is to stay south of the river, that increases the chance of the light rail branch being confirmed. Perhaps that should be routed through Wentworth Point?
Stage 2 does route through Wentworth Point, that was part of my "point" :p These are all strong development areas, all the way down to Carter St.

170717
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,780 Posts
I feel that one of the reasons the 20min is important is the need to allow for interchange at the city end increasing the trip time, as well as needing it to be sufficiently faster to encourage people to take the metro over the CityRail to relieve congestion.
20 min journey time has always been priority number one since they chose the route. Without that time saving it won't meet its most important objective, creating a faster alternative to T1, since it's nearly maxed out. It's not even worth contemplating a route that doesn't include that objective. 10 minutes quicker seems to be the sweet spot for both Metros.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,115 Posts
Here we go, the "it's not a typical metro" whinge again. It's not a metro, it's a rapid transit system that uses metro technology and carries the (nowadays much misused) moniker "Metro". It needs to be shaped by the function it is to perform, not by some doctrinaire definition.

They're getting a tram stop at Camellia, I thought that was to do the same job (assuming they can run the tram above walking pace this time around).
I think if the Parramatta region is supposed to be a high density CBD then a station on the eastern fringe at Camelia makes sense
Just under 2km from the central region (easily walkable to eastern side ammenities)
Tram interchange
Close to UWS campus
Close to Rosehill Racecourse/function centre
New high density precinct

Westmead to the west is about the same distance from the new Parramatta station and has similar ammenities - just swap out for a hospital
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
449 Posts
Camellia and Rosehill (at least east of James Ruse Drive) are somewhat of an enigma.

Camellia literally has a single dwelling that you can see from James Ruse Drive. Rosehill is a vast area that has the racecourse and of course all the industrial sites behind it. Neither the racecourse or the industry are going away as far as I can tell.

What will happen to Camellia is anyone's guess. Apart from a few renders of building envelopes from a few years ago it is hard to say for sure. Keep in mind that there will be a light rail stop there. Will that be enough to service Camellia if the area is converted to residential use? In all honesty, I don't know. I would argue that a Metro stop at Camellia only makes sense if the area is zoned for commercial use as an extension of Parramatta CBD almost like a business park. I know that idea has been suggested in the past. If however, the plan is to convert it to predominately residential use then I don't know if a Metro stop is necessary keeping in mind the impacts that has on the line.

I have a colleague in the local council and his comment was that the high-rise plans for Camellia were born out of necessity due to the cost of remediation. If you walk through that area now it is just empty wasteland. Could anyone really justify putting a train station where there is nothing but empty land today? Will it be converted to mixed use? Will it remain industrial? My guess is that in 15 years time I will still be walking past that concrete wall whenever l walk past.

Metro West is compromised between an all stops service and a speedy line between Westmead/Parra and Sydney CBD. It's easy for us to comment and ridicule decisions but in reality there are smart people working on this stuff and compromises must be made.

edit: after I typed all that I did some research on Camellia and see that things have been progressing with the master plan. Maybe my skepticism is a little unwarranted.
 
5841 - 5848 of 5848 Posts
Top