SkyscraperCity Forum banner

QUEEN'S WHARF | Under Construction

225565 Views 1551 Replies 104 Participants Last post by  puketutu
Cargo shed 'magic' for $84m

4:00AM Friday Jun 19, 2009
By Bernard Orsman


Two 97-year-old dock sheds will be converted into "magic spaces" for the Rugby World Cup under an $84.3 million plan approved by the Auckland City Council yesterday.

The sheds are the focal point of a plan for a cruise ship terminal and World Cup "party central" on Queens Wharf.

The council opted to restore the two 1912 cargo sheds instead of building a basic terminal for $112.8 million, an "iconic" terminal for $144 million or a basic cup fan zone for $52.1 million.

The $84.3 million has been included in the council's long-term budget, but it will be paid by all Aucklanders when the Super City takes over next year.

The Government and the Auckland Regional Council each paid $20 million to buy the wharf from Ports of Auckland, so the city council's proposal takes the total cost to just over $124 million.

Its city development general manager, John Duthie, said the two cargo sheds were "magic spaces", full of exposed kauri, totara and matai native timber and steel beams.



The plan is to turn the eastern shed into a cruise ship terminal in conjunction with a live site on the ground floor for World Cup events.
The western shed would have a more basic upgrade for use during the rugby tournament, and would be converted afterwards to another use, such as a new home for the Auckland Theatre Company.

The theatre company believes a combined 500- to 600-seat theatre and cruise ship terminal would be complementary in an "architecturally stunning" multipurpose building.

Auckland City Mayor John Banks said an open day would be held soon to show Aucklanders how fabulous the buildings were on the inside and how special they could look.

Heart of the City chief executive Alex Swney said the council plan appeared to be a good middle-ground option that would open up a quintessential Auckland location to showcase the city for the World Cup.
Although the bill will be spread across the region - and has to be approved by the Auckland Transition Agency before it can be passed to the Super City - several city councillors yesterday criticised the amount of money involved in the project.

City Vision councillor Cathy Casey said the new spending was "World Cup-itis".

"The symptoms are feverish spending of ratepayers' money on anything to do with Rugby World Cup 2011 and blindness to the real long-term needs of Aucklanders living in the suburbs," she said.

Deputy Mayor David Hay said that until recently the regional council was going to develop Queens Wharf, but now it and the Government had "dished us up a big problem and a huge opportunity".

Based on an assessment showing 35 per cent of the economic benefits from a cruise ship terminal would go to the whole country, the council would seek a $30 million contribution from the Government "or other parties".

Rugby World Cup Minister Murray McCully said he was not surprised Auckland City was seeking money from other parties, but the focus should be on other councils rather than the Government, which had already paid $20 million towards the purchase.

Auckland Regional Council chairman Mike Lee said he had not been briefed on the council's plans, but he would not be "rubber-stamping" them without some scrutiny.

"The ARC's approach would be to have the wharf open, and have a new building - that's our preference as the part-owner. But we'll have a good look at Auckland City's plan in an open way."
See less See more
2
221 - 240 of 1552 Posts
However, I think they have some very interesting potential, that could respect their heritage value and also provide a great long-term solution for the wharf.
What heritage value to they have, they are hardly unique, just two not so very old storage sheds. I don't believe in the keep it beause its old mantra.
Well if anyone can find other similar sheds in Auckland I'd be interested in knowing about them!

The sheds aren't actually that old (built since 1900) so I think a lot of their heritage value is in how they've contributed to Auckland's history, and also some interesting technical history in how they're early uses of their materials, design and so forth. I know that Queens Wharf itself is a very early use of ferro concrete.
G
Melbourne, once again, has some great examples but then again they are worth keeping because they have architectural merit ... not some over-sized bach. However, I will keep an open mind and wait for the results of the design competition (the old age homes have already booked the buses - just like at the Te Wero Bridge competition ;) )
I think there is next to nil value in keeping the sheds, at least move them somewhere else. Instead build an architecturally stunning convention centre that will be a tourist attraction in its own right and completely revitalise that part of the waterfront.
Great shots kiwi - I particularly like the first one showing the flow back up to Queen Street. Personally, I would really like to see Queens wharf kept as open as possible, we have very little open space right downtown and it could become a great place just to connect with the harbour. I'd love to see the end of the wharf extended with steps down to the water, so you could step down and interact rather than just look at it. Princess Wharf I find has been overbuilt and I'd like to see the opposite here.

Something missing in Auckland are day and night-markets, and keeping the large shed as an open space for such events and the area around it open could lead to a pretty nice public event space. We used to have something similar at Aotea square before the renovations there.

e.g. in Marrakesh where they have outdoor BBQs and shops every evening.


or day/morning markets

I only show this ancient looking photo because it to is in some kind of 'shed' ;-)

Dunno, I think something low-key could be a nice contrast to all the glass and highrises in the CBD and more locals oriented, Princess wharf has in some respects become more a place for tourists staying at the Hilton.
See less See more
3
I think there is next to nil value in keeping the sheds, at least move them somewhere else. Instead build an architecturally stunning convention centre that will be a tourist attraction in its own right and completely revitalise that part of the waterfront.
I reckon a convention centre is better suited somewhere else, they also need plenty of road access to bring equipment in and out and also parking. We should to not have roads onto the wharf. I think we should have something for Aucklanders not just for international visitors.
Queens Wharf Heritage Assessment: http://www.queenswharf.org.nz/competition/docs/heritageassessment.pdf (12 MB PDF)

Part of the introduction:
Following the formation of the Auckland Harbour Board in 1871, improvements to the Auckland waterfront were planned. Queens Wharf was part of a comprehensive plan for the redevelopment of the wharves and waterfront prepared by the Auckland Harbour Board Engineer W.H. Hamer in 1904.

Construction of Queen’s Wharf commenced around 1907 when the ferry jetty was built and was completed in 1913. Five substantial cargo handling and storage sheds and a building for the Wharf Police on the wharf were progressively built between 1909 and 1914. Queens Wharf was one of the earliest reinforced concrete structures built in Auckland, designed to be strong enough to support rail carriages. The design of the wharf and sheds was designed to fully integrate transportation by rail, road and shipping.

The sheds themselves were substantial industrial buildings, designed to support huge loads and to enable efficient handling of cargo. From time to time they have also been used for a range of temporary functions such as exhibition spaces to house the Auckland Agricultural and Pastoral Show, boxing matches and choir performances.

The wharves and harbour edge that make up Auckland’s waterfront represent a pivotal aspect of Auckland’s social, industrial and engineering heritage. The
link between Auckland’s settlement history and technological development is exemplified by the 1904 harbour scheme, of which the sheds on Queens Wharf are two remaining examples. The importance of the waterfront, as a primary factor in the development of Auckland as a city, is an important theme in Auckland’s development history that needs to be reflected in any future development of this area.

The wharf and sheds form part of a group of features on Auckland’s waterfront including the Harbour Board gates and fences, bollards and rail tracks, the Ferry Building, historic buildings in the Britomart precinct and the downtown area, which represent these historic themes.
Some historical pictures:






See less See more
4
Hi Everyone, first post for me. Congrats on the great threads.

Some of jarbury's photos of the internal steelwork remind me of the roof of Mercado de San Miguel in Madrid.

some inspiration there perhaps,

from MadridLaCiudad on flickr
See less See more
Hi Everyone, first post for me. Congrats on the great threads.

Some of jarbury's photos of the internal steelwork remind me of the roof of Mercado de San Miguel in Madrid.
I see your point, but the similarity is extremely limited to just a basic beam shape, and that can be found everywhere. The Mercado de San Miguel has far more detail both on the interior and exterior.

Interior:
Look at the ornate iron work holding up the ceiling beams:




There is no such detail in the Queens Wharf sheds.




We must also consider the exterior. The market in Madrid has quite a detailed historical exterior which was clearly modernized. But the original elements are still there which makes this building so much more special than the Queens Wharf sheds.




There is no such intricate detail on the Queens Wharf Sheds.



And to illustrate the difference from what the Madrid market looked like, here is an old photo. You can see the details are not fake, they are original. This was a beautiful building before renovation and it was simply modernized. The Queens Wharf sheds are ugly buildings. Unlike the market in Madrid, which was carefully architecturally designed for people, this shed is nothing more than a quick shed pulled up for industrial purposes.




I'm a big fan of converting historical industrial buildings and renovating them. We have some splendid examples here in Europe. But you need a fantastic building to start with. Europe, being at the forefront of the industrial revolution built many magnificent industrial palaces. Some of them are so elaborate and beautiful in design, it is hard to believe they were intended for industrial use. NZ never had this to the same level. All that aside, where a beautiful industrial building exists, by all means, retain it and redevelop it. But a historical structure shouldn't just be kept for the sake of it being historical. It must have merit. Just because it's old, doesn't mean it's nice. It's the same with modern architecture as well.
See less See more
7
If it were up to me then id tear them down tomorrow... but only if what is to replace them is properly thought out... Wgtn I think is a good reference, you could also use Somerset on the Pier (Hotel) in Hobart also as an argument to upgrade... although it is questionable as to the architectural merit of the structures themselves.. forgetting the timber and steel construction inside (which isnt uncommon lets face it)

Seriously though given the timeline here keeping them for the WC by way of a spit and polish might not be the worst Idea in the world. This would give us time to think about the best use of the site as we are not going to get to many more parcels of space down by the harbour at the foot of the CBD again any time soon and would avoid spending a lot of money for a one off event.

Its also hard to see a recreation of the viaduct precinct with cafes/restaurants etc being sustainable for AKL as a whole. and frankly would be a waste of an opportunity.. Not a fan of the convention centre or hotel down there either..
See less See more
I'm a big fan of converting historical industrial buildings and renovating them. We have some splendid examples here in Europe. But you need a fantastic building to start with. Europe, being at the forefront of the industrial revolution built many magnificent industrial palaces. Some of them are so elaborate and beautiful in design, it is hard to believe they were intended for industrial use. NZ never had this to the same level. All that aside, where a beautiful industrial building exists, by all means, retain it and redevelop it. But a historical structure shouldn't just be kept for the sake of it being historical. It must have merit. Just because it's old, doesn't mean it's nice. It's the same with modern architecture as well.[/QUOTE]

well said.... If you read through the assesment the architectural assesment says it all really.. The more I look at the old photos, particularly the older ones the more I think an almost entirely open space is the way to go ultimately.
See less See more
Seriously though given the timeline here keeping them for the WC by way of a spit and polish might not be the worst Idea in the world. This would give us time to think about the best use of the site as we are not going to get to many more parcels of space down by the harbour at the foot of the CBD again any time soon and would avoid spending a lot of money for a one off event.

Its also hard to see a recreation of the viaduct precinct with cafes/restaurants etc being sustainable for AKL as a whole. and frankly would be a waste of an opportunity.. Not a fan of the convention centre or hotel down there either..
I agree with the sentiment that rushing into something that is cheap and unsustainable in the long term is a bad idea, something that works well for the RWC doesn't mean it'll be something that will be good afterwards. The thing I like about the sheds is that they can be left as multi-functional spaces, attempting to develop a 2nd viaduct precinct won't work as I doubt Auckland can sustain it. The Viaduct struggle for a while after the America's Cup, so the same would be here.
'Opening the Red Gates' Public Access Day


'Opening the Red Gates' Public Access Day
Opening of Queens Wharf to the general public
Sunday 13 September 2009
1pm to 4pm




Take the opportunity to visit Queens Wharf and wander along this piece of Auckland's maritime history. You'll get a feel for the planned development of the wharf and see for yourself the extraordinary position it commands on the Waitemata Harbour and on the edge of the central city. By standing on the wharf itself, we think it will be easy for you to see how Queens Wharf can become a jewel of Auckland's waterfront.
See less See more
Auckland:hahaha: why are you always embarrassing yourself all the time don't you know that the world is watching and having a good ole:puke:at your constant cheap & nastiness, look Auckland stop trying to be a 1st world city when are only just a 3rd world city:eek:ld:
What do you know dipshit
Auckland:hahaha: why are you always embarrassing yourself all the time don't you know that the world is watching and having a good ole:puke:at your constant cheap & nastiness, look Auckland stop trying to be a 1st world city when are only just a 3rd world city:eek:ld:
:applause:



^^ Wow! Kauri Sarking! So Exciting!! Lets jump in joy.
See less See more
221 - 240 of 1552 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top