Thanks for opening up the thread in the other forum, thryve.
There was actually another collection of opinion letters a couple of weeks ago in the paper about amalgamation and name change (similar to today's transportation page). The general consensus seemed to be to pick a name that wouldn't offend anybody, and I agree with that.
My opinion of Waterloo is that it's small city that's trying to act big. In my opinion, there isn't much that distinguishes Waterloo from any number of other small cities in Canada except, of course, the two universities.
There are even Kitchener and Cambridge equivalents to the boring, sprawling suburban areas that you've mentioned. Geez, the people I know that live in Westvale wish that they didn't live there or at the very least think that there's nothing remarkable about it. For safety reasons, don't even think of telling a person from Beechwood that they don't live in the centre of the universe...
Those are just my perceptions (well some of them, but I don't want to offend anyone reading this who is from Waterloo

) but you can rest assured that I wouldn't want to call the city Kitchener or Cambridge either.
Buuuuuuuuut I digress, none of that had anything to do with LRT. So in conclusion, uh, go trains!