SkyscraperCity Forum banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
154 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Will Australia ever get over it Capital City Compulsion and shift its development ideas to regional projects?

Praise Canberra, without it the interior of the Australian landmass would be totally void of a city of any real size.

Is there any possibility of a city of any real size being developed in the interior, either an existing city or an entirely new one?
 

·
...........
Joined
·
29,096 Posts
^^And one of the most inhospitable interiors in the world also. It isn't actually that nice living in the interior than living on the coast unless you want to live in small areas, in which case you wouldn't normally live in a city if there was one there.
 

·
Put it in your mouth
Joined
·
7,109 Posts
Wasn't it last year that the number of people living in cities finally overtook the number of people living in rural areas?

I wouldn't be suprised if inland towns and cities started dying. Mining keeps a lot of them alive (in WA's case at least) but other towns wouldn't be so lucky. Farming in Australia is a dying cause, water is an issue, and most young people leave for the city as soon as they can.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
511 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
154 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
I know QLD, VIC, NSW and TAS have larger regional centres, but if you look at SA we have Adelaide with over 70% of the population and then the next largest city is Mount Gambier with about 30,000 - not even 10% of Adelaide's size.

We need better incentives for immigration to regional areas. SA should bump its immigrant qouta up to at least 25-30,000 a year!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
215 Posts
I know QLD, VIC, NSW and TAS have larger regional centres, but if you look at SA we have Adelaide with over 70% of the population and then the next largest city is Mount Gambier with about 30,000 - not even 10% of Adelaide's size.

We need better incentives for immigration to regional areas. SA should bump its immigrant qouta up to at least 25-30,000 a year!
Do you know what percentage of Victoria's population is in of Melbourne? I would've thought it would be around 70% too.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
234 Posts
Biggest inladnd towns are

Canberra, Toowoomba, then Bendigo, ballarat? Thats technically only 2 inland towns with pops greater than 100,000. The vast majority are about 20-30000 e.g. Tamworth, dubbo, Kalgoorlie, Mildura, Shepperton, Bathhurst
 

·
̙͈̩ͫ̎Ż̌ͫ&
Joined
·
3,549 Posts
GOB said:
Do you know what percentage of Victoria's population is in of Melbourne? I would've thought it would be around 70% too.
About three quarters - more if you include Geelong and the peninsulas.

Then, excluding Geelong, the satellite cities of Melbourne and the Mornington Pen.:

*The biggest regional cities are Bendigo and Ballarat each on about 100k, then LaTrobe City (Moe, Morwell, Traralgon) on about 70k.

*The next level are the larger regional towns the likes of Shepparton, Warrnambool, Wodonga, and Mildura from 30-35k.

*Then it drops to the 10-15k bracket, roughly: Wangaratta, Bairnsdale, Ocean Grove/Barwon Heads, Colac, Echuca, Hamilton, Horsham, Portland, Sale, Swan Hill, Warragul

*And the small centres 5-10k: Benalla, Castlemaine, Clifton Springs, Leopold (Geelong), Maryborough, Ararat, Cobram, Drouin, Seymour, Kyabram, Lakes Entrance, Stawell, Torquay, Wonthaggi

That's old 2001 data so many would have increased in population (and some declined). Not hard classings since many have large rural catchments which aren't included in the town's population - ex. Mildura Rural City Council has a population in excess of 50k, many families working blocks outside the actual town.

Best place to go for Vic data is either:

DoI - Know your area
or Local Government Victoria

It would be good to get some data from the other states.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top