Joined
·
1,090 Posts
alright, so i have noticed in the buffalo and rochester thread(which i frequent) that the continuous discussion of things other than building, renovation,etc(economics as well as sports and other things) has come into question.
i would like to know what people think. buffalo/rochester forumers, and all others.
are economics relevant in discussion of development news?
are politics relevant in the development news?
are sports, entertainment, blah blah blah relevant in development news?
i personally believe they are, atleast to some extent. i think they are in particular, to rochester and buffalo as their exisiting environments and current projects can be equated very closely to past and current economic conditions.
on the other hand, i recognize that this is first and foremost a development forum. should buildings and construction and discussion thereof be the primary focus or this website's forums, regardless of an areas economic problems/advantages?
:cheers:
i would like to know what people think. buffalo/rochester forumers, and all others.
are economics relevant in discussion of development news?
are politics relevant in the development news?
are sports, entertainment, blah blah blah relevant in development news?
i personally believe they are, atleast to some extent. i think they are in particular, to rochester and buffalo as their exisiting environments and current projects can be equated very closely to past and current economic conditions.
on the other hand, i recognize that this is first and foremost a development forum. should buildings and construction and discussion thereof be the primary focus or this website's forums, regardless of an areas economic problems/advantages?
:cheers: