Yes. Detroit and Cleveland will look pretty nice when New York and Miami are underwater.
I doubt that the most of the major coastal cities will be too affected if sea levels rise.Yes. Detroit and Cleveland will look pretty nice when New York and Miami are underwater.
yes, we're all screwed! Everyone will have to migrate to Indianapolis, then the city of Indy will merge with the state of Indiana to create super unigov.aren't detriot, cleveland, chicago, milwaukee, etc. all on water as well?
The sea level rise wouldn't effect the Great Lakes at all. It would affect Quebec and the St. Lawrence valley area but that's about it.yes, we're all screwed! Everyone will have to migrate to Indianapolis, then the city of Indy will merge with the state of Indiana to create super unigov.
I was just joking.The sea level rise wouldn't effect the Great Lakes at all. It would affect Quebec and the St. Lawrence valley area but that's about it.
If the sea level rises as much as the fearmongers would have us believe then yes there should be a significant migration to the interior. Especially since the warmer seas would produce more frequent and ferocious hurricanes.
I heard the same thing. The areas west of the mississippi will get much dryer and the Great Lakes region will become wetter and more "tropical". There are some projections that have Illinois aquiring a climate similar to coastal North Carolina.:nuts:As for the Midwest itself, the plains region (from Kansas westward) may end up getting hit hard. It may be the Dustbowl all over again. At the same time, Minnisota may be reaping the benefits from heightened temperatures. There will always be both winners and losers when climates shift.
OK. Take your time. Concentrate. Now,I read an article somewhere that said that if sea levels rose due to global warming, the Great Lakes wouldn't be affected because they're actually above sea level. I don't know the logistics behind this.
the great lakes are unaffected by sea level.I read an article somewhere that said that if sea levels rose due to global warming, the Great Lakes wouldn't be affected because they're actually above sea level. I don't know the logistics behind this.
Even without global warming, & even Bush now concedes the reality of global warming, it sure would be great if the Great Lakes area were repopulated to replace/reverse the decades of outmigration from the rustbelt cities & small town/rural areas. Misguided Federal policies & corporate relocations have encouraged the depopulation of the hearland. The cold Midwestern winters & hot summers may not be so great, but its a lot more sustainable than places like Pheonix & Vegas that could run out of water. The Great Lakes is one of the our best natural resources.Worse case scenerio:
if global climate change accelerates towards the quicker ends of the predictions taking us to midcentury, do you see a possibility of a significant (dare I say refugee) migration to the interior of the nation, particularly the midwest from coastal areas damaged and shrunk by rising waters?