SkyscraperCity banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

8,354 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Do you think the Wright Amendment would dramatically increase flights at Lambert?

Southwest sees pie in the sky for Lambert
By Tim McLaughlin

Southwest Airlines says Lambert Field isn't living up to its full potential.

Southwest Chief Executive Gary Kelly wants to help by adding more flights. But first the low-cost airline needs to repeal a federal law that restricts the airline's flights out of its home base at Dallas Love Field.

"St. Louis hasn't fully realized the benefit of the free market," Kelly told the Post-Dispatch Thursday in an interview. "It's remarkably connected to the rest of the country, except on Southwest Airlines because we're still restricted."

St. Louis stands to gain more than any other city if the Wright Amendment is repealed, Kelly said. The 1979 federal law largely prevents Southwest from operating nonstop flights on its Boeing 737s from Love Field to most U.S. cities. But thanks to legislation championed last year by Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, R-Mo., Missouri has been exempted from the restriction.

Southwest began to offer flights between Love and Lambert in December. American Airlines, which strongly opposes repeal of the Wright Amendment, also offers flights on that route.

American, though, would have preferred to keep the traffic exclusively flowing through its megahub at nearby Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Southwest could fly out of Dallas-Fort Worth, but won't compete against American on its turf.

The competition on the St. Louis-Dallas route has been good for consumers. Ticket prices have dropped dramatically since the addition of the Love Field flights by both airlines.

Southwest says its daily flights between Lambert and Love Field are carrying about 9,000 passengers each way per month. Meanwhile, Kelly and Southwest would like to fly unfettered from Love Field to the rest of the country.

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst at Calyon Securities, said he isn't convinced St. Louis would benefit any more than it already has with the exemption of Missouri from the Wright Amendment.

"I can't see how it would help St. Louis that much," Neidl said.

Kelly said Congress has asked Fort Worth and Dallas to come up with a joint recommendation on how to resolve the Wright Amendment issue. "They don't want the Missouri example to continue, where one state gets (exempted) one at a time," he said.

American spokeswoman Mary Frances Fagan said her airline opposes any move by Southwest to eliminate the so-called "through ticketing" provision of the Wright Amendment. Southwest can't offer or advertise the availability of flights between Love Field and any city outside the nine states in the Wright Amendment service area.

While in St. Louis, Kelly met with Lambert Airport Director Kevin Dolliole and spoke to officials at the St. Louis Regional Chamber and Growth Association.

Southwest isn't happy about its increased operating costs at Lambert. Southwest and American, two of the airport's biggest sources of revenue, see the $1.1 billion price tag of Lambert's new runway in their operating costs.

Kelly said he doesn't want to sound as if he's complaining. He expressed confidence that Dolliole and his staff will keep costs stable.

Besides, he said, the new runway, good on-time numbers, unused capacity and a central location are what make Lambert an attractive airport for Southwest to build traffic. The market also improved in the view of Southwest when American, in late 2003, reduced its schedule by some 200 daily flights.

For now, Kelly said, Southwest has made no detailed plans or projections for St. Louis.

"More than any other location St. Louis stands to gain a lot by flowing passengers through here," Kelly said. "We're a point-to-point carrier. And about 80 percent of our customers fly nonstop."

Repeal of the Wright Amendment would boost traffic within the overall Southwest system.

"If we have more passengers that get onboard a Baltimore flight coming to St. Louis that's flowing through to Dallas, then we're going to add more St. Louis-to-Baltimore flights," he said. "It has a very dramatic effect. It's only good."

469 Posts
Something has to happen at Lambert, because that airport is in dire straights. I remember when it was somewhat happening, back in the days of TWA. Now, you can see tumbleweeds blowing through it.

St. Louis needs a major carrier to use it as a hub. As the current configuration stands, you can't fly anywhere from St. Louis without going to Chicago, Dallas, or Atlanta first. It sucks.

The Jive is Alive.
1,537 Posts
^Well that's a bit of an exaggeration. There are still plenty of direct flights to many cities. But you're right, Lambert is a sad case, especially because it used to be one of the 10 busiest airports in the USA only a few years ago. Now we two major terminals, a new runway and not enough traffic to fill it. Sad.
1 - 4 of 4 Posts