..
That's just the way it is, I don't know. I lived in Split for a number of years, and I have to say that it still has a fair share of tourists so it's not like it is unknown. At the same time, it never did reach the same prominence. Split is somewhat poorer, so I'm sure that's a part of the reason. But personally, I like its character more, and Diocletian's palace is enough to send any Roman history buff to heavenPyRoMaNiAc said:Beautiful city and pictures. Why is Split less "advertised"? When I was searching for pictures, I found a lot of pictures of Rovinj, Pula, Zadar, and of course Dubrovnik but very little of Split.
http://www.pbase.com/ralvis/split_croatia
Actually, it's one of the richer cities in Croatia. It's called water damage. Some pressure washing and it should come off. Visit any Mediterranean city and you're bound to see some buildings like that.MIMICA said:Those pictures of Split are absolutely stunning. I am certainly in love with the city, but I must admitt some areas make it look extremely poor.I've seen some pictures where practically the walls are black! I don't know how this happened, but I suppose the city will get fixed up sooner or later...
PyRoMaNiAc said:Actually, it's one of the richer cities in Croatia. It's called water damage. Some pressure washing and it should come off. Visit any Mediterranean city and you're bound to see some buildings like that.
Water, not war you silly. And it's fairly common, and costs a fair bit of $$$ to fix. Many of these buildings are immensly old to begin with. Go visit Italy, by all accounts a richer country--you will still find this. Hell, Dubrovnik isn't devoid of this.MIMICA said:Yes, I am fully aware that it is called "war-damage"...Why hasn't it been fixed yet is the real question? BTW, pressure washing won't fully fix it, there are many dents and scratches...All pressure washing does is remove the top layer of decay on the facade to make it look cleaner...More needs to be done...