SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Spring District/Bel-Red Development News and Photos

204634 Views 1247 Replies 99 Participants Last post by  DawgFan
From the DJC's recent Urban Development special piece

http://www.djc.com/news/re/11201144.html
81 - 100 of 1248 Posts
I disagree that this is a planning failure. The big complaints that I'm seeing, and which I agree with, are mostly a function of consolidated ownership. The designs in the neighborhood are fine. They're not extraordinary, but they're fine. If Wright Rundstad had parceled this out and sold all the land--which is exactly what they did for the first 5 years--we would have a very different neighborhood. But market conditions changed, Shorenstein came is as an endlessly monied partner, and Meta showed up and said "we'll take all of it". That's not a planning problem or a political problem, it's a consequence of all the land being controlled by one owner and there's nothing any city government can do about that. And, lest we forget, Sound Transit is going to serve this area and many people will get there using the light rail. They also facilitated a great connection to the Eastrail, which in a couple years will be a seamless connection throughout most of the eastside. So yeah, it's a boring office park, but it's far from a planning failure.
See less See more
I think the critical piece you're missing is that planners work for the elected officials. Municipal planners have almost no autonomy to go out do things they aren't directed to do by council or mayor. Furthermore, American planning is largely a technical exercise and not a creative one. Ask a city councilmember what they think the planning department does and they'll probably mumble something about codes.
We had top-down planning in the early/mid-20th century and when it yielded mass displacement and inequitable outcomes, we tossed out visionary thinking entirely and replaced it with risk-averse technical studies. In other parts of the world they learn from their mistakes and empowered creative solutions, not so here.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
We've strayed way off topic but as a reformed planner myself, I'm now of the opinion that most land use planning and zoning in America is mostly a failed endeavor. In an effort to improve the quality of the built environment, we instead pick around at the details of projects that are largely imperceptible and have a nominal benefit to the public good, while pretending we can't do anything to address the big and important stuff like walkability and overall placemaking. It's really sad to be honest.
Good news it's for sale! I'm pretty sure that part of BelRed is zoned only for office though...
I assume Spring Blvd. will be extended on the south side of the parcel? Anyone know what other street connections would be required?
Look for this one to start before the end of the year.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Post-permit revisions are common once a project gets a final certificate of occupancy. Office is an allowable ground floor use in that part of the city so the city has no recourse. Once a project has a certificate of occupancy they can do whatever they want, provided it meets code.
I don't remember hearing about this project but it's quite big. It backs up onto the YMCA property and it isn't actually as lush as this rendering would have one believe.
See less See more
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
These are fine looking buildings but it sure would be nice to get some variety in designers. I'm pretty sure all the offices have been NBBJ projects and I think that creates some amount of monotony.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
More new stuff coming for Bel-Red. 187 units in total.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Spring district is shiny and nice but man do I wish it had more residential.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Wow. Very impressive scale! Some of my least favorite architects, but oh well. These are preliminary massing studies so will of course get updated as design progresses.
Also, I hope this will spur the city into gear on completing Spring Blvd. Last I checked the city hadn't even allocated funding, let alone started design and construction. I assume it's at least ~3 years away at least.
Not technically in the Spring District but close enough. Good to add more residential.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
288 more homes coming to Bel Red
  • Like
Reactions: 5
More Spring District residential development.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Looks good! I wonder who is going to do the residential. ARE doesn't do residential so they must have a partner.
  • Helpful
Reactions: 1
2
Another big master planned development coming for Spring District. The article notes that the Wright family is involved, along with a couple of other parties. They're proposing 10 buildings in a mix of office/lab in about 240k SF, and mixed use residential with about 930 units. I included a screen grab of the giant block, for additional context.

See less See more
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
Yeah, agree, Mox is cool. I Maybe they'll find a home in one of the new buildings nearby. There are plenty of mixed us buildings in development right now in the neighborhood.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The surface parking lot is going to be redeveloped into housing in the next 2-3 years. As for the electrical cabinet I'm going to assume there is a good reason it needs to be accessible directly to the platform.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The map provided in the article is not the correct site. It's actually the current Safeway bottling plant site.
Per the press release "The buyer was Alco Spring District LLC, associated with Alco.... Alco often holds properties for developers, including but not exclusively SRM Development, then sells them back after permits are obtained."
Let's hope this is true and SRM shows up with a big residential plan. Whatever they do, Safeway will need to move their operations somewhere else so I'm sure whatever happens is a couple years away. Still, progress!
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
81 - 100 of 1248 Posts
Top