SkyscraperCity banner

Rate the Skyline

  • 10

    Votes: 20 7.8%
  • 9.5

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 9

    Votes: 13 5.1%
  • 8.5

    Votes: 13 5.1%
  • 8

    Votes: 34 13.3%
  • 7.5

    Votes: 25 9.8%
  • 7

    Votes: 40 15.6%
  • 6.5

    Votes: 25 9.8%
  • 6

    Votes: 23 9.0%
  • 5.5

    Votes: 13 5.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 12 4.7%
  • 4.5

    Votes: 8 3.1%
  • 4

    Votes: 10 3.9%
  • 3.5

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • 3 or less

    Votes: 13 5.1%

  • Total voters
    256
1 - 20 of 201 Posts
E

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
4

It has the Arch, a cookie cutter baseball stadium and a whole lot of unremarkable skyscrapers... StL has amazing density of 10-12 story buildings, etc etc... but as a skyline... sans the arch.. it fails to make an impact
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
180 Posts
With all the pictures and info on the forums I think much more of SL than I used to. No offense intended, but for the size of the metro, and aside from the Arch, I think its skyline is very unimpressive.
 
K

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
with the arch maybe a 6 or 7, without the arch, a 5.
The skyscrapers there are tall, then go down significantly in height. The city and metro is dense, but it doesnt look like the skyline is... Maybe Im seeing it wrong.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
498 Posts
Actully i have never really seen any pics of St. Louis skyline. I expected much more from the city. The Arch is beautiful but the rest is nothing special. 6.5/10
 

·
Arquitextualizado
Joined
·
7,230 Posts
Just for the arch, because the rest is normal

6.5/10
 

·
Here Since 2002
Joined
·
7,261 Posts
without the Gateway Arch, the St. Louis skyline would be normal NA, small, but dense in a way. 6.5/10
 
1 - 20 of 201 Posts
Top