I'm glad HK is finally moving forward with environmental programmes. I've been quite critical of its lack of progress compared with other world cities.
Waste Reduction - Recycling & User Fees
Recyclers to spend HK$61m at new park
Three recyclers will invest up to HK$61 million to recover and recycle plastic, rubber tyres and wooden waste after they were awarded land at the newly established Eco-Park
.
The trio are Jets Technics Limited, which will turn tyres into mattresses, Telford Envirotech, which shreds plastics into pellets for reuse, and Hung Wai Wooden Board, which reprocesses wooden waste into chipboard. They were awarded 10-year land leases at monthly rents of HK$11 to HK$21 per square metre.
The sites total 19,500 square metres, out of eight hectares of land put forward for public tender earlier this year. The Eco Park in Tuen Mun, with a total size of 20 hectares and costing HK$319 million to build, will come into operation in phases. Environment officials hope it will help divert waste from shrinking landfills.
The three recyclers, picked from a dozen bidders, will be required to handle at least 6,000 tonnes of plastic, 2,000 tonnes of wood and 8,000 tonnes of tyres a year, starting from next year.
Next month, officials expect to invite recyclers in plastics, organic waste and electronic and electrical waste to bid for the remaining 12 hectares.
"By encouraging and promoting the reuse, recovery and recycling of our waste resources and returning them to the consumption loop, the Eco Park will help to develop a circular economy within Hong Kong," said Environmental Protection Department director Anissa Wong Sean-yee, who signed contracts with the three recyclers yesterday.
Latest EPD figures show 7,300 tonnes of tyres, 118,625 tonnes of wood waste and 623,785 tonnes of plastics are sent to landfills each year.
Under the terms of the contracts, the three operators will be required to collect waste locally at their own cost and will not be allowed to use imported waste unless they have met the minimum recycling targets and gain approval from the Environmental Protection Department.
Three recyclers will invest up to HK$61 million to recover and recycle plastic, rubber tyres and wooden waste after they were awarded land at the newly established Eco-Park
.
The trio are Jets Technics Limited, which will turn tyres into mattresses, Telford Envirotech, which shreds plastics into pellets for reuse, and Hung Wai Wooden Board, which reprocesses wooden waste into chipboard. They were awarded 10-year land leases at monthly rents of HK$11 to HK$21 per square metre.
The sites total 19,500 square metres, out of eight hectares of land put forward for public tender earlier this year. The Eco Park in Tuen Mun, with a total size of 20 hectares and costing HK$319 million to build, will come into operation in phases. Environment officials hope it will help divert waste from shrinking landfills.
The three recyclers, picked from a dozen bidders, will be required to handle at least 6,000 tonnes of plastic, 2,000 tonnes of wood and 8,000 tonnes of tyres a year, starting from next year.
Next month, officials expect to invite recyclers in plastics, organic waste and electronic and electrical waste to bid for the remaining 12 hectares.
"By encouraging and promoting the reuse, recovery and recycling of our waste resources and returning them to the consumption loop, the Eco Park will help to develop a circular economy within Hong Kong," said Environmental Protection Department director Anissa Wong Sean-yee, who signed contracts with the three recyclers yesterday.
Latest EPD figures show 7,300 tonnes of tyres, 118,625 tonnes of wood waste and 623,785 tonnes of plastics are sent to landfills each year.
Under the terms of the contracts, the three operators will be required to collect waste locally at their own cost and will not be allowed to use imported waste unless they have met the minimum recycling targets and gain approval from the Environmental Protection Department.
1 - 20 of 43 Posts
They really need to look into expanding waste diversion and recycling in residential estates.
Time has come to throw out wasteful habits
An ambitious plan is in place to change the habits of the entire city and increase the range of material that can be collected for recycling
14 August 2007
South China Morning Post
The battle to change Hong Kong's wasteful habits is on in earnest and the Environmental Protection Department's ambitious goals for waste reduction underscore the urgency the government has placed on preventing a potential crisis in a city overloaded with its own garbage.
At the forefront of efforts to clean up Hong Kong's act is the EPD's principal environmental protection officer Lawrence Wong, who knows more than most about the problems our excessively wasteful habits are causing.
Dr Wong joined the EPD in the early 1990s and has been involved in virtually every aspect of waste management, from legislation to policy development, enforcement control and waste reduction. "Back in the early 1990s, we spent most of our time building waste disposal facilities, but that's not sustainable. We can't continue to build and dispose," he warned.
In December 2005, the department put together a policy framework document on the way forward for waste management for the 10 years from 2005 to 2014.
"It encompasses everything from waste reduction, re-use, recycling, to providing incentives for people to put the ideas into practice, public education, and how government can take the lead with procurement, support and technology," Dr Wong said.
One of the weapons within this arsenal is the so-called "source separation" of waste - an ambitious plan which provides recycling facilities as close as possible to the home, while broadening the range of recyclables that can be recovered beyond the now familiar "three-bin" collection points for paper, plastic bottles and aluminium cans.
The onus is on residents to divide their daily waste into the appropriate categories - from old clothing to electronic appliances, batteries, old computer equipment, old cookware, CDs and so on - for recycling at the designated refuse facility in their estate. Collectors will pay for the recyclables.
The EPD wants 80 per cent of Hong Kong's population participating in source separation by 2010.
"It's quite a task, and we also have yearly goals to attain," Mr Wong said. "We are using the number of housing estates to measure the population equivalent, so 80 per cent translates into a target of 1,360 housing estates participating by 2010.
"I can say that up until now, we're right on track. In 2005, we wanted to recruit 180 estates and we ended up with 225. Last year we wanted 400 and we recruited 497.
"By the end of this year we wanted 700 estates participating, and right now, as at the end of July, we have 650 - that's around 36 per cent of the population with the facilities in place to serve them.
"But of course what we need to do is ensure that this 36 per cent is actually participating - that's a different story."
As Dr Wong admitted, the participation rate was increasing, but was still not high - in some estates just 20 per cent of the residents. Changing people's habits was the task ahead.
"This is our focus in the coming years so by the time we get 80 per cent of the people with the available facilities, we also have the majority on board with the concept as part of their daily lives."
Dr Wong said the EPD faced three major hurdles with the programme.
First, it must ensure all the stakeholders of a housing estate adopting the programme are on board and in consensus, from property managers to cleaning companies, waste collectors and of course the residents. Second, the building's physical dimensions must be considered. Some easily accommodate waste facilities, while others do not.
The EPD has produced a guidebook with different estate models to help individual buildings find the model that would best suit their building.
The final hurdle is cost, and with renovations in some cases necessary there can be considerable expense. To address this the EPD has made funds available through the Environment Conservation Fund to cover up to 50 per cent of the total costs.
The EPD is also considering options on charges for disposal of waste for estates that do not adopt source separation. These options are now being prepared for public discussion later this year.
Dr Wong explained that as estates realised source separation could actually raise money and improve living environments, the reluctance would hopefully dissipate.
The road ahead would be difficult, as Dr Wong anticipated the last estates to come on board would be the most difficult to persuade to make the green changes. Ongoing publicity and awareness campaigns and an annual award scheme recognising the best estates as models for the city are part of the strategy.
Progress is being made. Although the total waste generated since 2000 is still increasing, the EPD has also recorded an increasing trend of waste recovery - and domestic waste disposal is decreasing.
Commercial and industrial waste, however, is increasing.
"It's not so much on the industrial side though," Dr Wong said. "The problem is commercial food waste - leftover food waste is the main source of waste in this area."
The EPD wants to recover - or recycle - 50 per cent of our total solid waste by 2014.
"We will always need landfill, but by taking all these measures, we will have a system that performs the best for Hong Kong's environment in the most cost-effective manner.
"To me there is no simple single solution, and at the end of the day we simply cannot rely on reduction and recycling alone as the only tool in managing our waste."
An ambitious plan is in place to change the habits of the entire city and increase the range of material that can be collected for recycling
14 August 2007
South China Morning Post
The battle to change Hong Kong's wasteful habits is on in earnest and the Environmental Protection Department's ambitious goals for waste reduction underscore the urgency the government has placed on preventing a potential crisis in a city overloaded with its own garbage.
At the forefront of efforts to clean up Hong Kong's act is the EPD's principal environmental protection officer Lawrence Wong, who knows more than most about the problems our excessively wasteful habits are causing.
Dr Wong joined the EPD in the early 1990s and has been involved in virtually every aspect of waste management, from legislation to policy development, enforcement control and waste reduction. "Back in the early 1990s, we spent most of our time building waste disposal facilities, but that's not sustainable. We can't continue to build and dispose," he warned.
In December 2005, the department put together a policy framework document on the way forward for waste management for the 10 years from 2005 to 2014.
"It encompasses everything from waste reduction, re-use, recycling, to providing incentives for people to put the ideas into practice, public education, and how government can take the lead with procurement, support and technology," Dr Wong said.
One of the weapons within this arsenal is the so-called "source separation" of waste - an ambitious plan which provides recycling facilities as close as possible to the home, while broadening the range of recyclables that can be recovered beyond the now familiar "three-bin" collection points for paper, plastic bottles and aluminium cans.
The onus is on residents to divide their daily waste into the appropriate categories - from old clothing to electronic appliances, batteries, old computer equipment, old cookware, CDs and so on - for recycling at the designated refuse facility in their estate. Collectors will pay for the recyclables.
The EPD wants 80 per cent of Hong Kong's population participating in source separation by 2010.
"It's quite a task, and we also have yearly goals to attain," Mr Wong said. "We are using the number of housing estates to measure the population equivalent, so 80 per cent translates into a target of 1,360 housing estates participating by 2010.
"I can say that up until now, we're right on track. In 2005, we wanted to recruit 180 estates and we ended up with 225. Last year we wanted 400 and we recruited 497.
"By the end of this year we wanted 700 estates participating, and right now, as at the end of July, we have 650 - that's around 36 per cent of the population with the facilities in place to serve them.
"But of course what we need to do is ensure that this 36 per cent is actually participating - that's a different story."
As Dr Wong admitted, the participation rate was increasing, but was still not high - in some estates just 20 per cent of the residents. Changing people's habits was the task ahead.
"This is our focus in the coming years so by the time we get 80 per cent of the people with the available facilities, we also have the majority on board with the concept as part of their daily lives."
Dr Wong said the EPD faced three major hurdles with the programme.
First, it must ensure all the stakeholders of a housing estate adopting the programme are on board and in consensus, from property managers to cleaning companies, waste collectors and of course the residents. Second, the building's physical dimensions must be considered. Some easily accommodate waste facilities, while others do not.
The EPD has produced a guidebook with different estate models to help individual buildings find the model that would best suit their building.
The final hurdle is cost, and with renovations in some cases necessary there can be considerable expense. To address this the EPD has made funds available through the Environment Conservation Fund to cover up to 50 per cent of the total costs.
The EPD is also considering options on charges for disposal of waste for estates that do not adopt source separation. These options are now being prepared for public discussion later this year.
Dr Wong explained that as estates realised source separation could actually raise money and improve living environments, the reluctance would hopefully dissipate.
The road ahead would be difficult, as Dr Wong anticipated the last estates to come on board would be the most difficult to persuade to make the green changes. Ongoing publicity and awareness campaigns and an annual award scheme recognising the best estates as models for the city are part of the strategy.
Progress is being made. Although the total waste generated since 2000 is still increasing, the EPD has also recorded an increasing trend of waste recovery - and domestic waste disposal is decreasing.
Commercial and industrial waste, however, is increasing.
"It's not so much on the industrial side though," Dr Wong said. "The problem is commercial food waste - leftover food waste is the main source of waste in this area."
The EPD wants to recover - or recycle - 50 per cent of our total solid waste by 2014.
"We will always need landfill, but by taking all these measures, we will have a system that performs the best for Hong Kong's environment in the most cost-effective manner.
"To me there is no simple single solution, and at the end of the day we simply cannot rely on reduction and recycling alone as the only tool in managing our waste."
Take back your toxic junk
Hong Kong Standard
Monday, June 01, 2009
Manufacturers of computers and electronic and electrical goods should be forced by law to take back their products at the end of their life, a green group says.
Friends of the Earth says the move is needed to tackle the growing problem of e-waste.
Junked computers, their parts and other electronic products should be handed back to the people who made them under the "polluter-pays" principle, they say.
The idea can benefit makers by allowing them to retrieve valuable metals and boost their image as good corporate citizens.
The group is calling for a faster extension of a scheme that covers plastic bags to include e-waste.
Officials are collecting views from the public and will issue a formal public consultation paper by the end of this year.
At present, the only outlets for recycling e-waste are the Environmental Protection Department's mobile collection center and charity groups.
But according to FoE's senior environmental affairs officer Michelle Au Wing-tsz, the two channels struggle to handle the 1.5 million computers, electronic appliances and gadgets discarded each year.
She said gaming consoles are fast becoming a new source of e-waste.
"Most e-waste ends up in landfills or being bought by traders and used- goods buyers who will sell them to developing countries," FoE director Edwin Lau Che-feng said. Hong Kong and the mainland are bound by the Basel Convention to reduce the movements of hazardous waste between borders and specifically to developing nations.
But Lau said the smuggling of e-waste is still common because it is more profitable than planting cash crops.
"In villages they burn e-waste to retrieve metals, releasing carcinogens and heavy metals," he said.
Take-back schemes exist in Europe Taiwan, Japan and the United States where 70 percent of contamination in landfills comes from discarded electronics, which make up 2 percent of trash.
Hong Kong Standard
Monday, June 01, 2009
Manufacturers of computers and electronic and electrical goods should be forced by law to take back their products at the end of their life, a green group says.
Friends of the Earth says the move is needed to tackle the growing problem of e-waste.
Junked computers, their parts and other electronic products should be handed back to the people who made them under the "polluter-pays" principle, they say.
The idea can benefit makers by allowing them to retrieve valuable metals and boost their image as good corporate citizens.
The group is calling for a faster extension of a scheme that covers plastic bags to include e-waste.
Officials are collecting views from the public and will issue a formal public consultation paper by the end of this year.
At present, the only outlets for recycling e-waste are the Environmental Protection Department's mobile collection center and charity groups.
But according to FoE's senior environmental affairs officer Michelle Au Wing-tsz, the two channels struggle to handle the 1.5 million computers, electronic appliances and gadgets discarded each year.
She said gaming consoles are fast becoming a new source of e-waste.
"Most e-waste ends up in landfills or being bought by traders and used- goods buyers who will sell them to developing countries," FoE director Edwin Lau Che-feng said. Hong Kong and the mainland are bound by the Basel Convention to reduce the movements of hazardous waste between borders and specifically to developing nations.
But Lau said the smuggling of e-waste is still common because it is more profitable than planting cash crops.
"In villages they burn e-waste to retrieve metals, releasing carcinogens and heavy metals," he said.
Take-back schemes exist in Europe Taiwan, Japan and the United States where 70 percent of contamination in landfills comes from discarded electronics, which make up 2 percent of trash.
it is very surprising that that the Government does not introduce LAWS requiring the provision of recycling bins in every building of over XX units. For recycling to really work it must be very easy so even the non-greenies find it as easy as just throwing it away. If there is a law requiring waste stream provision then building owners will find a way (difficult but not impossible), if not then only a handful of treehuggers will walk the few hundred metres to the re-cycling bins.
HK Government seem to be all carrot and no stick
HK Government seem to be all carrot and no stick
I do not think recycling is a law in other jurisdictions. I've never heard of such initiatives in the US or Canada, for example. Recycling is a choice and people choose to put things in the recycling bin. Having laws for everything is not the way to go. We need to get people to buy-in to the concept. That being said, I am seeing recycling bins at many housing estates, although they could definitely be more prevalent on the streets.
However, a lot of people scavange the garbage bins on the streets looking for recyclable material to re-sell - cans and papers.
However, a lot of people scavange the garbage bins on the streets looking for recyclable material to re-sell - cans and papers.
i think it's a law in taipei to separate different kind of household waste, or get fined if found. i heard the scheme has gone pretty well
I would agree it would be difficult to enforce a law that required recycling (except for hazardous material - e.g. old engine oil) but the provision of recycling points is wowfully below other advanced cities. End of the street recycling bins is only good enough to attached a small % of users. Ideally laws should mandate that EVERY building must stream biodegradable, paper, plastic, metal and glass waste. Probably extend landfill life by 10 years.
I think it's very important to provide the facilities, such as improving public garbage bins for recycling material. I think people are very open to being environmental, especially nowadays as we all want clearer air. But if it's not convenient, people won't go out of the way to do it.
so would agree that legislation forcing all buildings to have waste stream would have a significant impact in improving the amount of recycling done in our city? Or is living within 400 mtrs of some over full bins good enough?
We need to provide incentives for developers to include recycling facilities, rather than force legislation for everything. You can't possibly legislate every single issue in the world. Perhaps more 'guidance' through zoning would help, but I think in general, new buildings are starting to catch the green wave. Maybe they realize some environmentally-friendly concepts will add to the sale price.
There are incentives for those green features now.We need to provide incentives for developers to include recycling facilities, rather than force legislation for everything. You can't possibly legislate every single issue in the world. Perhaps more 'guidance' through zoning would help, but I think in general, new buildings are starting to catch the green wave. Maybe they realize some environmentally-friendly concepts will add to the sale price.
For example, a green platform/garden high in the highrise can be excluded from the plot ratio calculation which result higher gross floor area and taller building.
Surely the energy efficiency performance of domestic buildings are lower now than they were 70 years ago. All carrot and no stick makes for a lazy donkey
Lawmakers, greens find five ways to curb waste
10 November 2010
South China Morning Post
Green groups and several lawmakers have come up with an action plan to reduce by two-thirds the amount of solid waste produced in the city by 2022.
The action plan aims to cut the 9,000 tonnes of solid waste generated each day to 3,000 tonnes by then.
It was devised by 19 groups and individuals - including Green Sense, Green Power, Greeners Action, WWF and lawmakers Tanya Chan and Andrew Cheng Kar-foo.
They suggest five ways to meet the target: fee-based waste disposal; increased recycling of leftover food; raising awareness of and responsibility for waste; boosting research; and building recycling and treatment facilities.
Generating less waste and promoting reuse should be the top priorities, followed by recycling and, as a last resort, methods such as incineration and landfills, Michelle Au Wing-tsz of Friends of the Earth said.
The government thinks otherwise. Environment secretary Edward Yau Tang-wah says two incinerators will be built, at Shek Kwu Chau, off Lantau, and in Tuen Mun.
Those behind the action plan said they would try to stop the incinerators being built. "Not only do we reject this plan of introducing incinerators, we will mobilise the public in a campaign against it," Au said.
Green groups involved in the action plan said the issue of waste management had been ignored for years.
Albert Lai Kwong-tak, chairman of middle-class lobby group the Professional Commons, said the city should learn from London's experience. "The former mayor of London told me they had made a mistake in building two incinerators hastily, and the city had lost the impetus to reduce waste," Lai said.
Lawmaker Cyd Ho Sau-lan, who was involved in the action plan, said getting people to buy only what they needed was critical to changing the habits of those in the world's most wasteful city. She said business would likely be in favour of the incinerators. "Asking everybody to reduce waste is tantamount to asking them to buy less," she said.
A Baptist University survey released last week concluded the city should build five more incinerators, not two. The report said while many Hongkongers still considered incineration unclean, technological improvements had made it a clean and effective way to dispose of waste.
And incinerators can also generate electricity. The report cited Macau, where an incinerator generates enough power for 33,000 families.
In Germany, 75 incinerators handle 18 million tonnes of rubbish a year and provide 60,000 jobs. In Japan, three-quarters of solid waste is burned and only 1.7 per cent goes to landfills, the report said.
Last year, the city generated 6.45 million tonnes of municipal solid waste - more than double the amount two decades ago and equal to 921 kilograms for each of its seven million people. The figure excludes construction and hazardous waste.
10 November 2010
South China Morning Post
Green groups and several lawmakers have come up with an action plan to reduce by two-thirds the amount of solid waste produced in the city by 2022.
The action plan aims to cut the 9,000 tonnes of solid waste generated each day to 3,000 tonnes by then.
It was devised by 19 groups and individuals - including Green Sense, Green Power, Greeners Action, WWF and lawmakers Tanya Chan and Andrew Cheng Kar-foo.
They suggest five ways to meet the target: fee-based waste disposal; increased recycling of leftover food; raising awareness of and responsibility for waste; boosting research; and building recycling and treatment facilities.
Generating less waste and promoting reuse should be the top priorities, followed by recycling and, as a last resort, methods such as incineration and landfills, Michelle Au Wing-tsz of Friends of the Earth said.
The government thinks otherwise. Environment secretary Edward Yau Tang-wah says two incinerators will be built, at Shek Kwu Chau, off Lantau, and in Tuen Mun.
Those behind the action plan said they would try to stop the incinerators being built. "Not only do we reject this plan of introducing incinerators, we will mobilise the public in a campaign against it," Au said.
Green groups involved in the action plan said the issue of waste management had been ignored for years.
Albert Lai Kwong-tak, chairman of middle-class lobby group the Professional Commons, said the city should learn from London's experience. "The former mayor of London told me they had made a mistake in building two incinerators hastily, and the city had lost the impetus to reduce waste," Lai said.
Lawmaker Cyd Ho Sau-lan, who was involved in the action plan, said getting people to buy only what they needed was critical to changing the habits of those in the world's most wasteful city. She said business would likely be in favour of the incinerators. "Asking everybody to reduce waste is tantamount to asking them to buy less," she said.
A Baptist University survey released last week concluded the city should build five more incinerators, not two. The report said while many Hongkongers still considered incineration unclean, technological improvements had made it a clean and effective way to dispose of waste.
And incinerators can also generate electricity. The report cited Macau, where an incinerator generates enough power for 33,000 families.
In Germany, 75 incinerators handle 18 million tonnes of rubbish a year and provide 60,000 jobs. In Japan, three-quarters of solid waste is burned and only 1.7 per cent goes to landfills, the report said.
Last year, the city generated 6.45 million tonnes of municipal solid waste - more than double the amount two decades ago and equal to 921 kilograms for each of its seven million people. The figure excludes construction and hazardous waste.
Hong Kong must act quickly to tackle imminent waste problem
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Government Press Release
The Government announced today (January 4) a comprehensive waste management strategy and action plan to tackle the imminent waste problem facing Hong Kong.
The Secretary for the Environment, Mr Edward Yau, said, "The Government has devised a concrete action plan which includes a number of initiatives to reduce waste at source, coupled with modern waste treatment facilities and extension of landfills, to tackle the imminent waste problem using a multi-pronged approach."
At present, about 13,300 tonnes of waste are disposed of at landfills every day, of which about 9,000 tonnes comprise non-recyclable municipal solid waste (MSW), 900 tonnes are sludge generated from the Harbour Area Treatment Scheme or other sewerage treatment processes, and about 3,200 tonnes are attributable to construction waste.
As the three existing landfills are expected to approach full capacity one-by-one from 2014 onwards, Hong Kong has an urgent need to enhance its waste management systems.
"The foremost task is reducing waste at source and our success rests on how we coordinate hardware facilities as well as achieving behavioural change among the public. Recycling facilities already cover 80% of the Hong Kong community. However, the Government will step up its efforts on this front. We will look into ways to encourage waste reduction and recovery through economic means. Our target is to increase the waste recovery rate from the current 49% to 55% in 2015," Mr Yau said.
The major tasks for reducing waste at source include strengthening district recycling facilities and networks on various fronts, implementing the next stage of the Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS), including stage two of the plastic shopping bag levy scheme and the PRS for waste electrical and electronic equipment, as well as launching a public consultation on MSW charging.
Mr Yau also pointed out that our current practice of relying on landfills alone in treating waste is not sustainable. Hong Kong must follow other advanced economies by planning to adopt modern technology such as a waste incineration facility and a food waste processing facility to raise our standards of waste treatment.
He stressed that these facilities would comply with the highest environmental standards. Besides relieving the pressure on landfills by significantly reducing the volume of waste, they can also transform waste into energy. They are an essential component of a modern waste management strategy.
As regards the proposed extension of the Tseung Kwan O landfill (also known as the South East New Territories landfill), Mr Yau noted that the Government was aware of the strong views opposing the plan and also of its proximity to residential area.
"After two months of thorough consideration, the Government has decided to amend the original proposal of expanding Tseung Kwan O landfill by 20.6 hectares. Firstly, the Administration will not seek to utilise the five hectares of land inside Clear Water Bay Country Park for landfill extension. Secondly, the Administration will reduce the area of landfill extension in Tseung Kwan O Area 137 to around 13 hectares. Thirdly, in response to the concern of the Sai Kung District Council, we have decided under the landfill extension project that only odourless waste (such as construction waste) will be sent to the Tseung Kwan O landfill with a view to further relieving the odour problem of Tseung Kwan O landfill," he said.
He explained that as certain procedures have to be completed prior to the development of the integrated waste treatment facility, it might not be commissioned until 2018. In the short-term, the Government must make further preparations for the ongoing utilisation of the landfills. The Government must earmark and level the land needed for the disposal of solid waste generated daily in Hong Kong before the landfills are filled up.
In the medium and long-term, even with continuous efforts in waste reduction and including modern incineration facilities, Hong Kong will still need landfills to cater for unavoidable waste such as municipal solid waste, which cannot be treated due to the limited scale of incineration facilities, as well as non-combustible waste and incineration ashes.
Mr Yau said that by diverting waste to suitable facilities and after the commissioning of other waste management facilities (such as the sludge treatment facility and organic waste treatment facility), it was estimated that the lifespan of the Tseung Kwan O landfill could be extended to around 2020 under the amended proposal, thus allowing for a period of overlap with the planning of a new permanent construction waste transfer facility. The new proposals have already minimised the area of extension of the landfill in order to address the concern of local residents.
"The way forward I have just outlined provides a clear blueprint for the waste management in Hong Kong in 2030 and it can be taken forward only with the concerted efforts of the community as a whole, relevant districts, political parties, councillors and the general public. We hope that the Legislative Council will offer realistic and attainable views on the Government's strategy and share responsibility with a pragmatic attitude and in the best interests of the whole community. We look forward to the understanding of the public towards the imminent waste management problem and their support for our work by participating in waste reduction and recovery and making good use of resources," Mr Yau concluded.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Government Press Release
The Government announced today (January 4) a comprehensive waste management strategy and action plan to tackle the imminent waste problem facing Hong Kong.
The Secretary for the Environment, Mr Edward Yau, said, "The Government has devised a concrete action plan which includes a number of initiatives to reduce waste at source, coupled with modern waste treatment facilities and extension of landfills, to tackle the imminent waste problem using a multi-pronged approach."
At present, about 13,300 tonnes of waste are disposed of at landfills every day, of which about 9,000 tonnes comprise non-recyclable municipal solid waste (MSW), 900 tonnes are sludge generated from the Harbour Area Treatment Scheme or other sewerage treatment processes, and about 3,200 tonnes are attributable to construction waste.
As the three existing landfills are expected to approach full capacity one-by-one from 2014 onwards, Hong Kong has an urgent need to enhance its waste management systems.
"The foremost task is reducing waste at source and our success rests on how we coordinate hardware facilities as well as achieving behavioural change among the public. Recycling facilities already cover 80% of the Hong Kong community. However, the Government will step up its efforts on this front. We will look into ways to encourage waste reduction and recovery through economic means. Our target is to increase the waste recovery rate from the current 49% to 55% in 2015," Mr Yau said.
The major tasks for reducing waste at source include strengthening district recycling facilities and networks on various fronts, implementing the next stage of the Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS), including stage two of the plastic shopping bag levy scheme and the PRS for waste electrical and electronic equipment, as well as launching a public consultation on MSW charging.
Mr Yau also pointed out that our current practice of relying on landfills alone in treating waste is not sustainable. Hong Kong must follow other advanced economies by planning to adopt modern technology such as a waste incineration facility and a food waste processing facility to raise our standards of waste treatment.
He stressed that these facilities would comply with the highest environmental standards. Besides relieving the pressure on landfills by significantly reducing the volume of waste, they can also transform waste into energy. They are an essential component of a modern waste management strategy.
As regards the proposed extension of the Tseung Kwan O landfill (also known as the South East New Territories landfill), Mr Yau noted that the Government was aware of the strong views opposing the plan and also of its proximity to residential area.
"After two months of thorough consideration, the Government has decided to amend the original proposal of expanding Tseung Kwan O landfill by 20.6 hectares. Firstly, the Administration will not seek to utilise the five hectares of land inside Clear Water Bay Country Park for landfill extension. Secondly, the Administration will reduce the area of landfill extension in Tseung Kwan O Area 137 to around 13 hectares. Thirdly, in response to the concern of the Sai Kung District Council, we have decided under the landfill extension project that only odourless waste (such as construction waste) will be sent to the Tseung Kwan O landfill with a view to further relieving the odour problem of Tseung Kwan O landfill," he said.
He explained that as certain procedures have to be completed prior to the development of the integrated waste treatment facility, it might not be commissioned until 2018. In the short-term, the Government must make further preparations for the ongoing utilisation of the landfills. The Government must earmark and level the land needed for the disposal of solid waste generated daily in Hong Kong before the landfills are filled up.
In the medium and long-term, even with continuous efforts in waste reduction and including modern incineration facilities, Hong Kong will still need landfills to cater for unavoidable waste such as municipal solid waste, which cannot be treated due to the limited scale of incineration facilities, as well as non-combustible waste and incineration ashes.
Mr Yau said that by diverting waste to suitable facilities and after the commissioning of other waste management facilities (such as the sludge treatment facility and organic waste treatment facility), it was estimated that the lifespan of the Tseung Kwan O landfill could be extended to around 2020 under the amended proposal, thus allowing for a period of overlap with the planning of a new permanent construction waste transfer facility. The new proposals have already minimised the area of extension of the landfill in order to address the concern of local residents.
"The way forward I have just outlined provides a clear blueprint for the waste management in Hong Kong in 2030 and it can be taken forward only with the concerted efforts of the community as a whole, relevant districts, political parties, councillors and the general public. We hope that the Legislative Council will offer realistic and attainable views on the Government's strategy and share responsibility with a pragmatic attitude and in the best interests of the whole community. We look forward to the understanding of the public towards the imminent waste management problem and their support for our work by participating in waste reduction and recovery and making good use of resources," Mr Yau concluded.
Recycle call to stop SAR going to waste
The Standard
Monday, January 10, 2011
A newly formed political party has accepted weight-based waste charges suggested by Environment Secretary Edward Yau Tang-wah but says it is more important to encourage reduction and recycling.
"We need to promote an even stronger recycling culture in Hong Kong and reduce our rubbish," Neo Democrats community officer Ben Chung Kam-lun said during a demonstration at the Central Government Offices.
Despite government efforts to encourage recycling, most rubbish bins in residential estates are misused as many people do not separate their trash.
A case in point is Lei Muk Shue Estate in Kwai Chung, where recycling bins on every level were either unused, or contained the wrong material.
The Legislative Council aims to have recycling bins on every level in every public housing estate by 2012.
Recycling bins in private estates are the responsibility of building owners and many simply do not bother. And many residents prefer to sell recyclables to junk dealers.
The shelving of government plans to use parts of Clear Water Bay Country Park to expand the Tseung Kwan O landfill will merely pave the way for more landfills, Chung believes.
"Increasing landfills is not a solution. We need to start from our homes and reduce waste," he said.
The party urged the government to follow the example of Taipei, where residents are required to buy specially printed biodegradable bags for waste disposal. This has reduced waste by a third while doubling recycling.
At the end of their protest, the party presented a government representative with its proposals for reducing waste, as well as a sample of the bags used in Taipei.
For many who attended the protest, a solution to the waste problem is of critical concern.
Francis Yam Kai-bong, 32, who has a 16-month-old son, said: "I want there to still be a Hong Kong when my son grows up, not a bunch of rubbish hills."
The Standard
Monday, January 10, 2011
A newly formed political party has accepted weight-based waste charges suggested by Environment Secretary Edward Yau Tang-wah but says it is more important to encourage reduction and recycling.
"We need to promote an even stronger recycling culture in Hong Kong and reduce our rubbish," Neo Democrats community officer Ben Chung Kam-lun said during a demonstration at the Central Government Offices.
Despite government efforts to encourage recycling, most rubbish bins in residential estates are misused as many people do not separate their trash.
A case in point is Lei Muk Shue Estate in Kwai Chung, where recycling bins on every level were either unused, or contained the wrong material.
The Legislative Council aims to have recycling bins on every level in every public housing estate by 2012.
Recycling bins in private estates are the responsibility of building owners and many simply do not bother. And many residents prefer to sell recyclables to junk dealers.
The shelving of government plans to use parts of Clear Water Bay Country Park to expand the Tseung Kwan O landfill will merely pave the way for more landfills, Chung believes.
"Increasing landfills is not a solution. We need to start from our homes and reduce waste," he said.
The party urged the government to follow the example of Taipei, where residents are required to buy specially printed biodegradable bags for waste disposal. This has reduced waste by a third while doubling recycling.
At the end of their protest, the party presented a government representative with its proposals for reducing waste, as well as a sample of the bags used in Taipei.
For many who attended the protest, a solution to the waste problem is of critical concern.
Francis Yam Kai-bong, 32, who has a 16-month-old son, said: "I want there to still be a Hong Kong when my son grows up, not a bunch of rubbish hills."
We all need to pitch in to solve waste problem
8 January 2011
South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's innovative thinking, wealth and technological prowess mean that many challenges that come our way can be overcome - some easily, some with hard work and determination. That has been shown time and again with impressive infrastructure projects that are the envy of other governments. But while we are able to engineer eye-catching buildings, subway systems and bridges, we are not so good at re-engineering a basic element of city living - the rubbish we produce, or specifically, the amount of it. With our landfills nearing capacity, we have no option other than to be less wasteful.
There is much work to do. In terms of municipal solid refuse, we are the most wasteful place in the world, with each of us producing 921kg in 2009. That is more than twice the amounts generated in Taiwan and South Korea, places with a similar development level and cultural background. It is not an achievement we can be proud of nor be willing to hold on to for long.
None of us can shirk our responsibility to generate less waste. The government has a significant role to play by promptly putting in place measures that have been on the table or planned for years, but left unimplemented for fear of upsetting various groups. Companies behind the products that we buy have to agree to strict packaging and recycling policies, while consumers have to do their bit by following the rules, thinking twice about what they buy and applying some of that can-do spirit that we are famous for.
We are at this juncture because so few of us have developed an environmental consciousness. Recycling of household rubbish, at so advanced a stage in other developed societies, remains rudimentary here. Hong Kong has limited space, which makes sustainability essential. The warnings have been ignored, and before the decade is out there will not be any room left in the three landfills.
The government's reluctance to respond decisively has not helped. It laid out a waste management framework in 1998, putting in place reduction targets that were repeatedly missed. Another scheme replaced it in 2005; it set out measures and a timetable to 2014 for reducing waste generation and increasing recycling. A landfill charge for construction waste has been highly effective, cutting the amounts being put into landfills by half, but a solid-waste levy and the building of incinerators remain on the drawing board.
No one wants to live next to a landfill or incinerator. Nonetheless, these have to be part of any effective management scheme. Incinerator technology has improved greatly since Hong Kong shut its last one down in 1997. The two that the government has planned for opening in 2016 and 2018 - if work on them starts soon - would produce few emissions and could double as power generators.
We need to move ahead on these plans now that the government's plan to extend the Tseung Kwan O landfill into the neighbouring country park has been abandoned amid public outrage. The authorities' lack of commitment led to the possibility of a legal battle over the powers of the executive and legislature after lawmakers voted the proposal down. Such reticence has to stop so that the needed measures can be enacted.
There is no need for more consultation. The overwhelming acceptance of the plastic bag levy proves that. It should be extended to all retail outlets. Voluntary schemes do not work when it comes to reducing waste. While we each have to be more responsible, laws, charges and rules are needed for the right mindset. We all need to pitch in. And we need leadership to show us the path forward.
8 January 2011
South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's innovative thinking, wealth and technological prowess mean that many challenges that come our way can be overcome - some easily, some with hard work and determination. That has been shown time and again with impressive infrastructure projects that are the envy of other governments. But while we are able to engineer eye-catching buildings, subway systems and bridges, we are not so good at re-engineering a basic element of city living - the rubbish we produce, or specifically, the amount of it. With our landfills nearing capacity, we have no option other than to be less wasteful.
There is much work to do. In terms of municipal solid refuse, we are the most wasteful place in the world, with each of us producing 921kg in 2009. That is more than twice the amounts generated in Taiwan and South Korea, places with a similar development level and cultural background. It is not an achievement we can be proud of nor be willing to hold on to for long.
None of us can shirk our responsibility to generate less waste. The government has a significant role to play by promptly putting in place measures that have been on the table or planned for years, but left unimplemented for fear of upsetting various groups. Companies behind the products that we buy have to agree to strict packaging and recycling policies, while consumers have to do their bit by following the rules, thinking twice about what they buy and applying some of that can-do spirit that we are famous for.
We are at this juncture because so few of us have developed an environmental consciousness. Recycling of household rubbish, at so advanced a stage in other developed societies, remains rudimentary here. Hong Kong has limited space, which makes sustainability essential. The warnings have been ignored, and before the decade is out there will not be any room left in the three landfills.
The government's reluctance to respond decisively has not helped. It laid out a waste management framework in 1998, putting in place reduction targets that were repeatedly missed. Another scheme replaced it in 2005; it set out measures and a timetable to 2014 for reducing waste generation and increasing recycling. A landfill charge for construction waste has been highly effective, cutting the amounts being put into landfills by half, but a solid-waste levy and the building of incinerators remain on the drawing board.
No one wants to live next to a landfill or incinerator. Nonetheless, these have to be part of any effective management scheme. Incinerator technology has improved greatly since Hong Kong shut its last one down in 1997. The two that the government has planned for opening in 2016 and 2018 - if work on them starts soon - would produce few emissions and could double as power generators.
We need to move ahead on these plans now that the government's plan to extend the Tseung Kwan O landfill into the neighbouring country park has been abandoned amid public outrage. The authorities' lack of commitment led to the possibility of a legal battle over the powers of the executive and legislature after lawmakers voted the proposal down. Such reticence has to stop so that the needed measures can be enacted.
There is no need for more consultation. The overwhelming acceptance of the plastic bag levy proves that. It should be extended to all retail outlets. Voluntary schemes do not work when it comes to reducing waste. While we each have to be more responsible, laws, charges and rules are needed for the right mindset. We all need to pitch in. And we need leadership to show us the path forward.
Sustainable waste management strategy long overdue in HK
9 February 2011
SCMP
I refer to the article by Bernard Chan ("Can we dispose of our growing waste problem?" January 28).
As an academic who is interested in waste management and recycling, I would say we cannot. But Hong Kong should manage its waste problem in a more sustainable way. To achieve the recently promulgated 55 per cent municipal solid waste recycling rate, incentives must be in place to encourage waste producers to reduce and recycle more waste.
Producer responsibility schemes and municipal solid waste charging have been effective in many places, by reducing waste generation. The success of the plastic bag levy is a good example. The government should expedite policy formulation and legislative processes to implement such incentives.
Mr Chan rightly said it would be difficult to impose volume or mass-related waste charges on individual households as implementation and enforcement would be complex with our high-rises and compact residential housing. But government statistics show that the most worrying trend in terms of waste increase is the increasing quantity of commercial waste (from malls, hotels, fast-food chains and airports).
It is easy to appreciate the problem if you think about the amount of waste generated after a fast food meal or when taking a flight into or out of Hong Kong. Disposal of such waste in Hong Kong is free. Incentives or penalties (in the form of a waste disposal charge) can discourage the indiscriminate use of one-off disposable items and encourage more recycling of waste. Implementing a charging scheme first for industrial and commercial waste would face hurdles. But it would be easier to get public and Legco support, if the administration was committed to putting in place a sustainable waste management policy.
While waste reduction and recovery should continue to be the main focus in the overall waste management strategy, there would still be substantial quantities of waste that cannot be recycled and need to be properly disposed of. We can learn from cities that are similar to Hong Kong, such as Taipei, Tokyo and Singapore. Their experiences prove that there is a need to develop thermal waste treatment facilities. With the advances made in combustion and air emission control technologies, modern incinerators offer environmentally acceptable technology that can effectively reduce the volume of waste requiring final disposal.
The not-in-my-backyard reaction to the siting of waste management facilities exists everywhere. Hong Kong is just too small to regionally demarcate waste management responsibilities too rigidly given the environmental constraints of siting these facilities. The government must work out with the affected local communities a package of appropriate community measures so that the opposition to the siting of these facilities can be alleviated.
C. S. Poon, professor and director, Research Centre for Environmental Technology and Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
9 February 2011
SCMP
I refer to the article by Bernard Chan ("Can we dispose of our growing waste problem?" January 28).
As an academic who is interested in waste management and recycling, I would say we cannot. But Hong Kong should manage its waste problem in a more sustainable way. To achieve the recently promulgated 55 per cent municipal solid waste recycling rate, incentives must be in place to encourage waste producers to reduce and recycle more waste.
Producer responsibility schemes and municipal solid waste charging have been effective in many places, by reducing waste generation. The success of the plastic bag levy is a good example. The government should expedite policy formulation and legislative processes to implement such incentives.
Mr Chan rightly said it would be difficult to impose volume or mass-related waste charges on individual households as implementation and enforcement would be complex with our high-rises and compact residential housing. But government statistics show that the most worrying trend in terms of waste increase is the increasing quantity of commercial waste (from malls, hotels, fast-food chains and airports).
It is easy to appreciate the problem if you think about the amount of waste generated after a fast food meal or when taking a flight into or out of Hong Kong. Disposal of such waste in Hong Kong is free. Incentives or penalties (in the form of a waste disposal charge) can discourage the indiscriminate use of one-off disposable items and encourage more recycling of waste. Implementing a charging scheme first for industrial and commercial waste would face hurdles. But it would be easier to get public and Legco support, if the administration was committed to putting in place a sustainable waste management policy.
While waste reduction and recovery should continue to be the main focus in the overall waste management strategy, there would still be substantial quantities of waste that cannot be recycled and need to be properly disposed of. We can learn from cities that are similar to Hong Kong, such as Taipei, Tokyo and Singapore. Their experiences prove that there is a need to develop thermal waste treatment facilities. With the advances made in combustion and air emission control technologies, modern incinerators offer environmentally acceptable technology that can effectively reduce the volume of waste requiring final disposal.
The not-in-my-backyard reaction to the siting of waste management facilities exists everywhere. Hong Kong is just too small to regionally demarcate waste management responsibilities too rigidly given the environmental constraints of siting these facilities. The government must work out with the affected local communities a package of appropriate community measures so that the opposition to the siting of these facilities can be alleviated.
C. S. Poon, professor and director, Research Centre for Environmental Technology and Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
LCQ7: Glass bottle recycling
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Government Press Release
Following is a question by the Hon Andrew Leung Kwan-yuen and a written reply by the Secretary for the Environment, Mr Edward Yau, at the Legislative Council meeting today (March 2):
Question:
In its paper submitted to the Commission on Strategic Development in January this year, the Environment Bureau states that at present Hong Kong achieves 49% municipal solid waste (MSW) recovery rate but about 13,300 tonnes of waste are still disposed of at landfills every day. In order to further reduce the volume of waste to be sent to landfills, the Government indicates that the MSW recovery target will be revised upward from 49% at present to 55% by 2015. Moreover, in his reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on October 27 last year, the Secretary for the Environment indicated that on average about 255 tonnes of waste glass containers were disposed of at landfills in Hong Kong daily in 2009, which was 2.8% of the total MSW volume. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(a) apart from the collaboration between the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and the Hong Kong Hotels Association in launching a voluntary Glass Container Recycling Programme for the Hotel Sector in 2008, whether the Government had, in the past three years, provided any support to non-profit organisations and private organisations which participated in other glass recycling programmes; if it had, of the form of support, the contents and geographical coverage of such recycling programmes; if not, the reasons for that;
(b) regarding the 12-month Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles, which has been launched at six public rental housing estates in East Kowloon by EPD in collaboration with the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) since January 15 this year, whether the Government has assessed its initial achievements; if it has, of the results; and
(c) whether the authorities will include the recycling of waste glass in the Programme on Source Separation of Domestic Waste implemented by HA and change the 3-coloured waste separation bins currently placed in public rental housing estates to 4-coloured waste separation bins; if they will, of the implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
President,
(a) In 2008, the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) joined hand with the Hong Kong Hotels Association to launch the Glass Container Recycling Programme for the Hotel Sector. So far, over 1,000 tonnes of glass bottles have been recovered. Besides, we have also encouraged those hotels that have not joined the recycling programme and the large catering service providers, such as the Hong Kong Jockey Club and the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, to actively organise their own glass bottles recycling and deliver the bottles collected to local recycling facilities for processing so as to facilitate recycling.
The EPD also actively supports local non-profit making organisations to organise glass bottle recycling activities locally and provides them with advice and assistance on the recycling. These activities include the glass bottle recycling campaign launched by the Hong Chi Association with fund from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to collect glass bottles at its 13 service centres throughout the territory as well as in the pub district at Minden Avenue, Tsim Sha Tsui. Besides, with funding support from the Environment and Conservation Fund, the Hong Kong Dumper Truck Drivers Association launched and promoted glass bottle recycling at the pub district in Wan Chai and some housing estates in East Hong Kong.
(b) In collaboration with the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA), the EPD launched the 12-month Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles in mid December 2010 at six public rental housing estates in East Kowloon, namely, Shun Lee Estate, Shun On Estate, Shun Tin Estate, Choi Ying Estate, Upper Ngau Tau Kok Estate and Yau Lai Estate. HKHA has placed glass bottle recycling bins alongside the existing 3-coloured waste separation bins in the lobbies or near the entrances of each residential block in the participating estates to facilitate the separation and recycling of glass bottles by residents. In the first two months of the pilot programme up to mid February this year, a total of 5.2 tonnes of glass (i.e. around 10,000 plus glass bottles) have been successfully recovered.
(c) Before considering to extend the existing waste separation and recovery system to cover waste glass bottles, we must ensure the availability of suitable and sustainable outlets for waste glass. To this end, the EPD funded a study carried out by a local university in 2004 which successfully used the granules from crushed glass bottles for the production of paving blocks. Since October 2010, the Highways Department has stipulated in its public road maintenance contracts that priority should be given to eco-paving blocks containing recycled glass for paving concrete block pavements, which could help promote the development of glass bottle recycling industry. In January 2011, the Government further issued a circular to all departments to encourage the use of recycled and other green materials in public works projects.
We will study furthering the recovery of glass bottles in Hong Kong with reference to the results of the Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles so as to better utilise our valuable resources.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Government Press Release
Following is a question by the Hon Andrew Leung Kwan-yuen and a written reply by the Secretary for the Environment, Mr Edward Yau, at the Legislative Council meeting today (March 2):
Question:
In its paper submitted to the Commission on Strategic Development in January this year, the Environment Bureau states that at present Hong Kong achieves 49% municipal solid waste (MSW) recovery rate but about 13,300 tonnes of waste are still disposed of at landfills every day. In order to further reduce the volume of waste to be sent to landfills, the Government indicates that the MSW recovery target will be revised upward from 49% at present to 55% by 2015. Moreover, in his reply to a question raised by a Member of this Council on October 27 last year, the Secretary for the Environment indicated that on average about 255 tonnes of waste glass containers were disposed of at landfills in Hong Kong daily in 2009, which was 2.8% of the total MSW volume. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(a) apart from the collaboration between the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and the Hong Kong Hotels Association in launching a voluntary Glass Container Recycling Programme for the Hotel Sector in 2008, whether the Government had, in the past three years, provided any support to non-profit organisations and private organisations which participated in other glass recycling programmes; if it had, of the form of support, the contents and geographical coverage of such recycling programmes; if not, the reasons for that;
(b) regarding the 12-month Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles, which has been launched at six public rental housing estates in East Kowloon by EPD in collaboration with the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) since January 15 this year, whether the Government has assessed its initial achievements; if it has, of the results; and
(c) whether the authorities will include the recycling of waste glass in the Programme on Source Separation of Domestic Waste implemented by HA and change the 3-coloured waste separation bins currently placed in public rental housing estates to 4-coloured waste separation bins; if they will, of the implementation timetable; if not, the reasons for that?
Reply:
President,
(a) In 2008, the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) joined hand with the Hong Kong Hotels Association to launch the Glass Container Recycling Programme for the Hotel Sector. So far, over 1,000 tonnes of glass bottles have been recovered. Besides, we have also encouraged those hotels that have not joined the recycling programme and the large catering service providers, such as the Hong Kong Jockey Club and the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, to actively organise their own glass bottles recycling and deliver the bottles collected to local recycling facilities for processing so as to facilitate recycling.
The EPD also actively supports local non-profit making organisations to organise glass bottle recycling activities locally and provides them with advice and assistance on the recycling. These activities include the glass bottle recycling campaign launched by the Hong Chi Association with fund from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to collect glass bottles at its 13 service centres throughout the territory as well as in the pub district at Minden Avenue, Tsim Sha Tsui. Besides, with funding support from the Environment and Conservation Fund, the Hong Kong Dumper Truck Drivers Association launched and promoted glass bottle recycling at the pub district in Wan Chai and some housing estates in East Hong Kong.
(b) In collaboration with the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA), the EPD launched the 12-month Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles in mid December 2010 at six public rental housing estates in East Kowloon, namely, Shun Lee Estate, Shun On Estate, Shun Tin Estate, Choi Ying Estate, Upper Ngau Tau Kok Estate and Yau Lai Estate. HKHA has placed glass bottle recycling bins alongside the existing 3-coloured waste separation bins in the lobbies or near the entrances of each residential block in the participating estates to facilitate the separation and recycling of glass bottles by residents. In the first two months of the pilot programme up to mid February this year, a total of 5.2 tonnes of glass (i.e. around 10,000 plus glass bottles) have been successfully recovered.
(c) Before considering to extend the existing waste separation and recovery system to cover waste glass bottles, we must ensure the availability of suitable and sustainable outlets for waste glass. To this end, the EPD funded a study carried out by a local university in 2004 which successfully used the granules from crushed glass bottles for the production of paving blocks. Since October 2010, the Highways Department has stipulated in its public road maintenance contracts that priority should be given to eco-paving blocks containing recycled glass for paving concrete block pavements, which could help promote the development of glass bottle recycling industry. In January 2011, the Government further issued a circular to all departments to encourage the use of recycled and other green materials in public works projects.
We will study furthering the recovery of glass bottles in Hong Kong with reference to the results of the Pilot Programme on Source Separation of Glass Bottles so as to better utilise our valuable resources.
1 - 20 of 43 Posts
SkyscraperCity Forum
A forum community dedicated to skyscrapers, towers, highrises, construction, and city planning enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about structures, styles, reviews, scale, transportation, skylines, architecture, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Top Contributors this Month
View All
Katarzyna DJ
7540 Replies
calatravavx
2630 Replies
Srdjan Adamovic
1887 Replies
Recommended Communities
Join now to ask and comment!
