Nigeria does not have less infrastructure than most Sub Saharan countries.
one can look at countries with more oil per capita such as Equatorial Guinea, Libya and Angola and in many cases low base economies and form a conclusion that they are magicians when this is not the case.
As with much of Africa, you cannot look at the level of development in mono cities and use it to form a blanket comparison for the entire countries being contrasted.
A lot of people compare Luanda to countries for example. How can you compare Luanda a city with a 1/3 the population of Lagos and less infrastructural demands to Lagos or Nigeria.
What happens if you compare Abuja to Kigali or Abuja to Luanda? do you still form the same conclusion that Nigeria is behind?
In terms of infrastructural growth Lagos is currently one of the fastest growing in Africa an this comes in spite of population influx.
Furthermore the construction that is poised to occur in Nigeria and is already unfolding would surpass that of any other African country.
a lot of people on this forum and elsewhere base their judgments and conclusions on anecdotal information.
What evidence suggests that Luanda is more progressive than Lagos for example? Some of the largest expressways and bridges in all of Africa are presently under construction in Lagos. You cannot base these judgments on anecdotal information.
I don't want to go further and further into this argument as there are so many points to raise, but I feel I have touched on some relevant issue.
one can look at countries with more oil per capita such as Equatorial Guinea, Libya and Angola and in many cases low base economies and form a conclusion that they are magicians when this is not the case.
As with much of Africa, you cannot look at the level of development in mono cities and use it to form a blanket comparison for the entire countries being contrasted.
A lot of people compare Luanda to countries for example. How can you compare Luanda a city with a 1/3 the population of Lagos and less infrastructural demands to Lagos or Nigeria.
What happens if you compare Abuja to Kigali or Abuja to Luanda? do you still form the same conclusion that Nigeria is behind?
In terms of infrastructural growth Lagos is currently one of the fastest growing in Africa an this comes in spite of population influx.
Furthermore the construction that is poised to occur in Nigeria and is already unfolding would surpass that of any other African country.
a lot of people on this forum and elsewhere base their judgments and conclusions on anecdotal information.
What evidence suggests that Luanda is more progressive than Lagos for example? Some of the largest expressways and bridges in all of Africa are presently under construction in Lagos. You cannot base these judgments on anecdotal information.
I don't want to go further and further into this argument as there are so many points to raise, but I feel I have touched on some relevant issue.