La Paz has a higher altitude than Quito. Lets say these are some of the highest scrapers.shivtim said:If you mean height above sea-level, I'd say maybe one in Quito or La Paz.
Quito sits at 9300 ft above sea level while Lhasa sits at about 12,000 ft above sea level. The 3000 ft difference is well over a 100-storey skyscraper (ie. Taipei 101).WANCH said:La Paz has a higher altitude than Quito. Lets say these are some of the highest scrapers.
Wait a sec. are we talking about La Paz or Lhasa? Yes true that Lhasa is higher than Quito.hkskyline said:Quito sits at 9300 ft above sea level while Lhasa sits at about 12,000 ft above sea level. The 3000 ft difference is well over a 100-storey skyscraper (ie. Taipei 101).
La Paz's altitude is comparable to Lhasa, and both are much higher above sea level than Quito.WANCH said:Wait a sec. are we talking about La Paz or Lhasa? Yes true that Lhasa is higher than Quito.
There are also many higher places on the Tibetian Plateau going up to around 4,500 meters, Gyantse at 3,800 meters has....hkskyline said:La Paz's altitude is comparable to Lhasa, and both are much higher above sea level than Quito.
Like really :bash:Joey313 said:this is the worlds tallest one
![]()