SkyscraperCity Forum banner
10,221 - 10,240 of 10,439 Posts
I took the open top sightseeing bus yesterday. Did the full red line tour on an electric bus.

I thought these attractions looked great from the bus (and hopefully would have impressed visitors):-
Cathedral Quarter/Necropolis.
Glasgow Green.
Templeton Carpet Factory.
People's Palace.
Parts of Merchant City.
St Vincent Place.
Buchanan Street.
Gordon Street.
Glasgow Uni.
Kelvingrove Park and Museum.
Park District.
The Murals.

However some parts of the tour weren't so impressive.
The bus passed the Met Tower which looks terrible. The Charles Oakley building isn’t looking great either.
High Street - lots of empty shops/run down feel.
Gallowgate/London Road gap sites.
Doulton Fountain was dry.
People's Palace was closed for renovation.
Argyle St West - a depressing streetscape (the guide described Kentigern House as the ugliest building in Glasgow).
We then drove under the Kingston Bridge and along the riverside to the SEC, Distillery and Riverside Museum before doubling back to Finnieston via the expressway - that was the bleakest part of the tour.
Crossing the M8 at Charing Cross was another low point.
Noticeable lack of maintenance of buildings even in prime spots. For example, there's a bush growing out of the Clydesdale Bank building on St Vincent Place.
Last and definitely least a bunch of wee neds gave us the finger at Charing Cross.

Eventually the gap sites should be filled, the empty shops occupied and the public realm upgraded. However I’m less optimistic about the built heritage. I did the same tour about 10 years ago and my perception is that there wasn't as much dilapidation of buildings as there is now. Owners seem less willing or able to invest in basic maintenance let alone redevelopment now. The council produce strategy documents but don’t have the money/powers to really turn things around. The lack of SG and UkG action is frustrating.
 
Eventually the gap sites should be filled, the empty shops occupied and the public realm upgraded. However I’m less optimistic about the built heritage. I did the same tour about 10 years ago and my perception is that there wasn't as much dilapidation of buildings as there is now. Owners seem less willing or able to invest in basic maintenance let alone redevelopment now. The council produce strategy documents but don’t have the money/powers to really turn things around. The lack of SG and UkG action is frustrating.
One thing i'd been pondering is if it would be a good idea to introduce a requirement to have a 5 yearly building survey carried out and the results sent to the local council, for all listed buildings.

There is already talk of mandatory 5 yearly surveys for residential blocks of flats/tenements in the proposed update to the common ownership/maintenance laws. If householders are expected to pay for them then i don't see how it could be overly onerous to ask commercial property owners to, too.

Then the issue becomes do the councils have the resources and powers to review and act on all the reports, but a) we can cross that bridge when we get to it, and b) i think there would be value in it anyway as getting a report saying "there's a fkn tree growing out your stonework, Christ only knows how much damage that's doing" would focus minds and get some repairs done regardless
 
There's a whole planning laws / viable usages / supply & demand / building values adversely affecting lending and tying down owners to basic life support 'Gordian knot' that needs a much more meaty bespoke solution for a lot of heritage buildings.
 
STV News had a feature last night about an organist who works at Kelvingrove and they asked tourists (all from overseas) what they thought of the organ and the museum generally and they all thought it was great.

We can see a lot of the problems because we live here, but sometimes it's worth seeing the city how outsiders see it and generally from what I've seen it's positive.
 
The new 'Southside' yellow route launched last summer is back but without the southside, except to visit Ibrox.

Crossing the 'ring of sh-t' between the river and the M74 is one of Britain's bleakest sojourns but I am surprised the whole thing was axed. I did notice last year it barely reached Shawlands so was clearly an Old Firm experience. This year confirms it.

Still; no bus to the Burrell.
 
The new 'Southside' yellow route launched last summer is back but without the southside, except to visit Ibrox.

Crossing the 'ring of sh-t' between the river and the M74 is one of Britain's bleakest sojourns but I am surprised the whole thing was axed. I did notice last year it barely reached Shawlands so was clearly an Old Firm experience. This year confirms it.

Still; no bus to the Burrell.
My Southside route would start m8 - m77 - Eaglesham as first stop - and then NM, Rouken Glen, and all the burbs up to Langside - there is nothing like Glasgow burbs anywhere in the world in terms of architectural harmony.
Then classic Southside: Battlefield monument, Shawlands, Pollock park, St Andrews Rd to Nitsdale and maybe Ibrox and Govan/Riverside Museum for more museums
 
So Scottish Ministers are set to give permission to the Flamingoland development. I'm not really that passionate about any of it, but you'd think from the coverage it was going to be halfway up Ben Lomond. It's in Balloch. You can't get any less 'peaceful and picturesque' than that on a half decent day.
 
So Scottish Ministers are set to give permission to the Flamingoland development. I'm not really that passionate about any of it, but you'd think from the coverage it was going to be halfway up Ben Lomond. It's in Balloch. You can't get any less 'peaceful and picturesque' than that on a half decent day.
It’s also more like an open to the public version of center parcs, absolutely nothing like flamingo land just happens to be owned by the same people. The media has had a big part to play in why people were so against it. Will be a great asset for the area bringing back in to use brownfield land. Only bit I’m not so keen on is the monorail which I think will silently disappear from their plans much like the George square fountain.
 
Is it brownfield land? It all looks like mostly woodland and and a bit of mixed grassland flanking the river Leven on google earth.

In any event I have no strong opinion either way - esp as I couldn't easily track down a good masterplan of the plans that got approved. Agree the monorail sounds bokers and a bit naff. Tourist businesses around there will love it and benefit from a lot more numbers in the area so it's def good for hospitality jobs and Balloch High st - and Scottish Enterprise are involved I think - but I would understand if a lot of local folk who live locally or prefer quiet woodland walks will hate it.

Image
 
Is it brownfield land? It all looks like mostly woodland and and a bit of mixed grassland flanking the river Leven on google earth.

In any event I have no strong opinion either way - esp as I couldn't easily track down a good masterplan of the plans that got approved. Agree the monorail sounds bokers and a bit naff. Tourist businesses around there will love it and benefit from a lot more numbers in the area so it's def good for hospitality jobs and Balloch High st - and Scottish Enterprise are involved I think - but I would understand if a lot of local folk who live locally or prefer quiet woodland walks will hate it.

View attachment 9252923
To be fair it is pretty green and lush lol but it’s technically brownfield since it used to be a rail yard from down there at the high street up to the loch going down the river. Other parts of the plan involve renovating the big old mansion up near the a82 as part of it and leaving the ancient woodlands intact (previous version included staff stuff being built in it).
Plans:

 
This isn't about Glasgow but I just wanted a wee moan about my trip to Millport today. As the ferry approached the island, I could see the bus that would take us to Millport approaching. But the fecker just drove off before anyone was able to get off the ferry. That led to around 20-30 people standing for ages waiting for the next bus, and by the time it arrived we had the next ferry-load of people in the queue as well.

These buses have one job: get people from the ferry slip to Milllport and back. Absolutely nothing else. The least you could do is wait for people getting off the ferry. It's so frustrating because this kind of bad customer service can leave a bad impression of Scotland.
 
This isn't about Glasgow but I just wanted a wee moan about my trip to Millport today. As the ferry approached the island, I could see the bus that would take us to Millport approaching. But the fecker just drove off before anyone was able to get off the ferry. That led to around 20-30 people standing for ages waiting for the next bus, and by the time it arrived we had the next ferry-load of people in the queue as well.

These buses have one job: get people from the ferry slip to Milllport and back. Absolutely nothing else. The least you could do is wait for people getting off the ferry. It's so frustrating because this kind of bad customer service can leave a bad impression of Scotland.
Rothesay ferry by bike...get to Wemyss Bay, bikes are last to be allowed off. You get off and watch the Glasgow train depart, and have to wait an hour. Joined up thinking.
 
Is it brownfield land? It all looks like mostly woodland and and a bit of mixed grassland flanking the river Leven on google earth.

In any event I have no strong opinion either way - esp as I couldn't easily track down a good masterplan of the plans that got approved. Agree the monorail sounds bokers and a bit naff. Tourist businesses around there will love it and benefit from a lot more numbers in the area so it's def good for hospitality jobs and Balloch High st - and Scottish Enterprise are involved I think - but I would understand if a lot of local folk who live locally or prefer quiet woodland walks will hate it.

View attachment 9252923
To be fair it is pretty green and lush lol but it’s technically brownfield since it used to be a rail yard from down there at the high street up to the loch going down the river. Other parts of the plan involve renovating the big old mansion up near the a82 as part of it and leaving the ancient woodlands intact (previous version included staff stuff being built in it).
Plans:

Looked at the plans for this back last year when it first was going before local planning. Couldn’t understand what all the fuss was about, it was fairly unintrusive imo. Wasn’t like some giant monstrosity towering over the loch and Balloch. Really thought the Greens and Ross Greer used it to bolster themselves rather than any concerns about spoiling the loch. Also many protesters lived miles away or across the country or abroad. Seemed a bit of a pile on for poor reasons to me.
 
The only thing that caught my eye from the protesters was that there was a flood risk. If the developers have addressed that then fine. I have no other problems with it.

I just remembered ages ago there was talk of a business leadership building at Loch Lomond but it seems that was cancelled in 2022 and they planned to open something similar in Pitlochry instead. I understand a lot of the concerns about building at Loch Lomond what with it being a national park, but it seems like it's really, really challenging to get anything done there.
 
10,221 - 10,240 of 10,439 Posts