SkyscraperCity Forum banner

Should the US build or improve it's HSR network?

  • Yes

    Votes: 666 93%
  • No

    Votes: 49 6.9%
10,121 - 10,126 of 10,126 Posts
I had heard it could go faster if the amount of stops were reduced, but unsure if that's the main issue here.
Main issue is old tunnels / bridges that require the trains to slow down a lot and lack of tensioned catenary overhead wires between DC & NYC which prevent speeds north of 125-135mph.

Amtraks goal is to get an Acela to and from DC-NYC (stops included) in 2 hrs 15 min.

NYC-Boston is a completely different animal due to multiple at grade crossings in Connecticut and no good alternative ROW.
 
From a recent cab video ride on the NEC between Boston and New York Penn that I saw, the only few remaining level crossings that I did see are in southern Massachusetts. Also, Amtrak is currently replacing the century-old Connecticut River bridge.

Mike
 
Trump administration wants to hand out $2.4 billion it took from California's high-speed railroad
AP Excerpt
Sep 22, 2025

The Trump Administration wants to redistribute $2.4 billion it pulled from California’s high-speed rail project as part of a new $5 billion program announced Monday to fund rail projects to boost passenger rail traffic nationwide.

The new program’s rules for states and others wanting to participate remove any mention of diversity or climate change dating to the Biden administration. The new program will also put a priority on projects in areas with higher rates of birth and marriage and projects that improve safety at railroad crossings.

The Trump Administration has removed climate change and so-called DEI language from other grant requirements, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy took a jab at that Biden-era language and California Gov. Gain Newsom’s rail project in his announcement.

More : Trump administration wants to hand out $2.4 billion it took from California's high-speed railroad
 
From a recent cab video ride on the NEC between Boston and New York Penn that I saw, the only few remaining level crossings that I did see are in southern Massachusetts. Also, Amtrak is currently replacing the century-old Connecticut River bridge.

Mike
There's quite a few in southern Connecticut, as well as some very slow segments through the coastal towns. In an ideal world a new line direct from New Haven to Providence would be the answer
 
I agree that that $2.4 Billion would be best spent on upgrading lines where it is possible to further the restoration of a general 'rail culture' throughout the USA. We can work on service times later on as needs arise.

Mike
 
All single track lines that have passenger services should be doubled.
All lines that have passenger services should have enforced minimum track quality standards.
Infrastructure and/or sidings should be altered or added if freight trains can't be sided to let passenger trains pass.
Rules on the priority of passenger trains should be enforced.
Solve slow zones by poor track alignment, such as unnecessary curves.
Eliminate level crossing wherever possible (also allowing for higher track speeds).
Consider electrification.
Consider nationalisation of railway infrastructure.
Stop considering public transport as a for profit service, but treat it a basic necessity.
And yes: In a country as big as the USA $2.4 billion is a drop in the ocean, but you have to start somewhere.
 
10,121 - 10,126 of 10,126 Posts